Topic: Gayness: Let's Talk about It

[Pablo de Fleurs]

18 Year old football player stabs his 27 year old lover with a steak knife cause the older man was gonna break it off with him. The relationship.

http://thegrio.com/2013/11/24/conn-football-captain-charged-with-killing-lover/

Damn. Ya see what a loaded gay can do? Time for another look at Gay-Ban legislation.

[Libertas]

Gay-Ban!

 

 

[Predator Don]

Gotta love the mothers comments.....

[Pandora]

Everytime I look at the subject line for this thread, I think "must we?"

/just sayin'

[BigAlSouth]

Everytime I look at the subject line for this thread, I think "must we?"

/just sayin'

Hey. You da Administrator. Administrate!
(It's ok with me to lock it. Otherwise . . . )

[Pandora]

Everytime I look at the subject line for this thread, I think "must we?"

/just sayin'

Hey. You da Administrator. Administrate!
(It's ok with me to lock it. Otherwise . . . )

Nono, that' not what I meant at all.

What I meant is simply "don't ya get tired of having it in yer face alla time?"

[Pablo de Fleurs]

Everytime I look at the subject line for this thread, I think "must we?"

/just sayin'

Hey. You da Administrator. Administrate!
(It's ok with me to lock it. Otherwise . . . )

Nono, that' not what I meant at all.

What I meant is simply "don't ya get tired of having it in yer face alla time?"

I was gonna' say something about gays...

...but I faggot what it was.

[Predator Don]

Everytime I look at the subject line for this thread, I think "must we?"

/just sayin'

Hey. You da Administrator. Administrate!
(It's ok with me to lock it. Otherwise . . . )

Nono, that' not what I meant at all.

What I meant is simply "don't ya get tired of having it in yer face alla time?"

I was gonna' say something about gays...

...but I faggot what it was.

Ahh.....faggot about it....

[Pandora]

Everytime I look at the subject line for this thread, I think "must we?"

/just sayin'

Voila!  As  rationale for my comment, I present --

Constant talk builds the impression that public opinion is at least divided on the subject and that a sizable bloc -- the most modern up-to-date citizens -- accept or even practice homosexuality.

    .... The main thing is to talk about gayness until the issue becomes thoroughly tiresome (pages 177-178).

It worked; it is.  This part, as applies to me, did not:

Application of the keep-talking principal can get people to the shoulder-shrug stage.

Good piece.  RTWT.

P.S. I wonder how much Bernays and his methods were applied here.

[Libertas]

If by shrug they mean to ridicule and skewer their asinine debate tactics, weak position and utter failure at making moral equivalency, then yes, I shrug.

 

[LadyVirginia]

yes, that tactic has worked even among my own family members.

[IronDioPriest]

This is a fascinating read. Homosexual historians and anthropologists sh*t all over the Left's claim that homosexuality is an innate, genetic predisposition. The evidence for their conclusions is surprisingly self-evident, and does not support the heteronormative point of view, nor does it support sexual morality. Nonetheless, it seems to be a frankly honest assessment of one of the Left's prime tenets of homosexuality.

In a nutshell, they say that human sexuality has always been all over the map, but homosexuality is an invention of Western civilization. That apparent dichotomy should pique your interest. It's long, and I read every word.

Gay Historians: Nobody is "born that way"

[LadyVirginia]

This is a fascinating read. Homosexual historians and anthropologists sh*t all over the Left's claim that homosexuality is an innate, genetic predisposition. The evidence for their conclusions is surprisingly self-evident, and does not support the heteronormative point of view, nor does it support sexual morality. Nonetheless, it seems to be a frankly honest assessment of one of the Left's prime tenets of homosexuality.

In a nutshell, they say that human sexuality has always been all over the map, but homosexuality is an invention of Western civilization. That apparent dichotomy should pique your interest. It's long, and I read every word.

Gay Historians: Nobody is "born that way"

While they claim no one is born gay they make the companion argument that no one is born straight. I think that's a false assumption made to bolster their conclusion no one is born gay. They could hardly claim no one is born gay and let the obvious conclusion be made that if you're not born gay you must be born straight. Rather they are attempting to foster the idea that we're whatever and our culture defines that that is. I think this is more dangerous thought than dividing people into gay or not gay. 

[ChrstnHsbndFthr]

Gay is not a word I use. Use Homosexual or Sodomite. There is NOTHING happy about this behavioral issue.

[Pandora]

This is a fascinating read. Homosexual historians and anthropologists sh*t all over the Left's claim that homosexuality is an innate, genetic predisposition. The evidence for their conclusions is surprisingly self-evident, and does not support the heteronormative point of view, nor does it support sexual morality. Nonetheless, it seems to be a frankly honest assessment of one of the Left's prime tenets of homosexuality.

In a nutshell, they say that human sexuality has always been all over the map, but homosexuality is an invention of Western civilization. That apparent dichotomy should pique your interest. It's long, and I read every word.

Gay Historians: Nobody is "born that way"

While they claim no one is born gay they make the companion argument that no one is born straight. I think that's a false assumption made to bolster their conclusion no one is born gay. They could hardly claim no one is born gay and let the obvious conclusion be made that if you're not born gay you must be born straight. Rather they are attempting to foster the idea that we're whatever and our culture defines that that is. I think this is more dangerous thought than dividing people into gay or not gay.

Just more of the same as "race/sex is a cultural construct" marxist claptrap.  Now "sexual orientation" is a "cultural construct"?  What would they say about pedophiles who have never been abused as children and rapists who have never been raped as children?

I'm so SICK of all of this crap, I'm finally thankful I never had children.

[Libertas]

More crap to be sick of...the watering down of language...

As Equality Matters reported this week, use of the term “homosexual” to refer to gay and lesbian people long ago fell out of favor with most mainstream news outlets, as “homosexual” is commonly used by opponents of LGBT equality — and rarely by advocates.
 
Fox News, however, is slow to change. The network, which apologized after it came under fire in February for its open mockery of the term “intersex,” continues to use “homosexual” when reporting on gay and lesbian people. As pointed out by Equality Matters, conservative pundit Todd Starnes recently wrote on FoxNews.com that “Christians are trading places with homosexuals” in a story about an Air Force veteran who claimed he was “relieved of his duties because he disagreed with his openly gay commander over gay marriage.”

http://weaselzippers.us/180964-gay-lib-rag-the-advocate-outraged-fox-news-uses-term-homosexual/

 

Maybe I agree...   

I prefer something more descriptive, like FAGGOT and DYKE!

(I could be even more descriptive...don't tempt me!)

Oh, and Mr. Peters, you are now known to me as Lord Faggotron! 

[Weisshaupt]

Via Instapundit's 21st Century Relationships category: My ex didn't tell me she was transgender, (his/her/its) sister told me and I married her instead

Oh barf.

Several years ago I dated a woman named “Rhonda” for three months. I broke up with her after her sister “Amy” revealed to me that Rhonda was born “Ron” and showed me ample evidence. When I confronted Rhonda about her being a transsexual woman, she broke down and confessed that she was going to tell me, but only after we had been intimate! (Luckily we hadn’t been yet.) It wasn’t her transsexuality that ended the relationship, but her deception; I am not a transphobic person.

Um that is so very sad that someone can't feel free to say , "hell yeah, I ended the relationship because this "woman i was dating" is really a surgically mutilated man, and that was a huge turnoff for me in so many ways." and not "Well if she had been honest with me I definitely  would have hit that and married it"

But wait it gets worse

Today, she says, some trans people who have had reassignment surgery assert they simply had a birth defect that was corrected, and therefore their past is nobody’s business.

A birth defect? A complete and well formed Penis is a Birth defect? But mutilating that organ and jamming it inside the body is a "correction"?

But above all, Boylan noted the violation committed when Amy decided to out Rhonda, a revelation that was not hers to make. I hope you can understand how Amy’s act cleaved her family and shattered her relationship with her sister.

Her sister?  You mean her horribly mutilated brother. A Sister would have had a womb? Does this sister have a womb? SAnd if she is a girl without a womb, isn't that a "Birth Defect" ?

It is you who has become the toxic influence. And as Boylan points out, now that you and Amy are about to become parents, think about how you would react if your own child turned out to be transgender, which might help you better understand all your in-laws.

How would I React? Horrified and desperate to get them psychological help and prevent them from mutilating their own bodies in a hopeless and stupid attempt to become something they are not?

Garrison:   [correcting him] Mrs. Garrison.
Doctor:   Mmrs. Garrison, you can't have an abortion.
Mrs. Garrison:   Don't you tell me what I can and can't do with my body! [gets up, goes to the nurse, and hugs her] A woman has a right to choose!
Doctor:   No, I mean you're physically unable to have an abortion, because you can't get pergnant.
Mrs. Garrison:   But I missed my period.
Doctor:   You can't have periods either. [Mrs. Garrison looks surprised] You had a sex change, Mr. Garrison, but you don't have ovaries or a womb. You don't produce eggs.
Mrs. Garrison:   [sits down] You mean, I'll never know what it feels like to have a baby growing inside me and then scramble its brains and vacuum it out?
Doctor:   N-that's right.
Mrs. Garrison:   But I paid five thousand dollars to be a woman. This would mean I I'm not really a woman. Ih, I'm just a... a I'm just a guy with a mutilated penis!
Doctor:   Basically, yes.
Ms. Garrison:   
...Oh boy, do I feel like a jackass.

http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/104426/scramble-its-brains-or-vacuum-it-out

[Libertas]

Transphobic?

 

I travel just fine...oh...not  transportation-phobic....

 

They have one thing in common with Muzzies though...predisposition toward genital mutilation...so they got that going for them...