Author Topic: Unmarried couple can acquire a kid  (Read 934 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 64031
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Unmarried couple can acquire a kid
« on: January 05, 2014, 11:39:11 AM »
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/friends-adopt-judge-landmark-ruling-article-1.1565408#ixzz2pMmtRwxh

Sure, why not?  Kids are just another right, right?  Just another object to be allowed to possess.  WTF could possibly go wrong, eh?  There's always more kids...

 ::bashing::
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Online Pandora

  • Administrator
  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 19530
  • I iz also makin a list. U on it pal.
Re: Unmarried couple can acquire a kid
« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2014, 11:54:53 AM »
Quote
“G. calls KAL ‘Mommy’ and LEL ‘Daddy,’” and “although they live in separate households,” they “have created a nurturing family environment for G., including a well-thought-out, discussed and fluid method of sharing parenting responsibilities between their homes.”

"Their homes" meaning the adults' homes.  The kid *has* no home.  If the judge was smart (well, smartER; smart would have meant saying NO), she'd have told the adults to pick a permanent residence for the kid and have them rotate in and out.  See how it feels for them to have to keeping packing up and moving/shuffling from one place to another.

"Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer." - Mark Twain

"Let us assume for the moment everything you say about me is true. That just makes your problem bigger, doesn't it?"

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 64031
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: Unmarried couple can acquire a kid
« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2014, 12:27:34 PM »
Quote
“G. calls KAL ‘Mommy’ and LEL ‘Daddy,’” and “although they live in separate households,” they “have created a nurturing family environment for G., including a well-thought-out, discussed and fluid method of sharing parenting responsibilities between their homes.”

"Their homes" meaning the adults' homes.  The kid *has* no home.  If the judge was smart (well, smartER; smart would have meant saying NO), she'd have told the adults to pick a permanent residence for the kid and have them rotate in and out.  See how it feels for them to have to keeping packing up and moving/shuffling from one place to another.

Can't be disrupting adults now...or thinking of the child first...that is so...so...old fashioned!

Seriously, the judge is a dolt.
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.