Author Topic: U.S. Trademark Office Says ‘Redskins’ is Derogatory  (Read 756 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Pandora

  • Administrator
  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 19529
  • I iz also makin a list. U on it pal.
U.S. Trademark Office Says ‘Redskins’ is Derogatory
« on: January 08, 2014, 11:38:05 AM »
WTF are these people and who gave them the power and authority to censor?!

Quote
There will be no trademark for “Redskins Hog Rinds,” a bad omen for the Washington Redskins in the legal battle over their name.

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has rejected a request from a company to sell pork rinds using the word “Redskins” because it deemed the term to be “derogatory slang.”

In a letter dated Dec. 29, the agency wrote: “Registration is refused because the applied-for mark REDSKINS HOG RINDS consists of or includes matter which may disparage or bring into contempt or disrepute persons, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols.”

The same agency is deliberating whether to revoke the trademark protection for the NFL team, part of a long-running challenge from a group of Native Americans. A hearing was held in March, and a decision is expected soon.

H/T Drudge
"Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer." - Mark Twain

"Let us assume for the moment everything you say about me is true. That just makes your problem bigger, doesn't it?"

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 64006
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: U.S. Trademark Office Says ‘Redskins’ is Derogatory
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2014, 11:44:59 AM »
 ::bigmooning::

It's not their business to make such judgements, it is thier function to only process patent and trademark paperwork, fothermucking over-officious bureaucratic asswipes!  Somebody needs to burn their damn house down!

They tellin' me there isn't vile crap getting passed along in their stupid little office that wouldn't offend anybody?  Does Larry Flint have a trademark on Hustler?  How does that compare to this, morally or otherwise?

Assholes!

Screw the Fedcoats.  People should start their own private clearninghouse authority and do what these assholes do without the censorship and cronyism, and let the courts go screw themselves too if they dare interfere!

Time for putting up with all of this bullsh*t is OVER!
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline Alphabet Soup

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 5610
  • Hier standt ich. Ich kann nicht anders
Re: U.S. Trademark Office Says ‘Redskins’ is Derogatory
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2014, 01:00:23 PM »
F 'em. Use it anyway.

Look at it this way - you have the use of whatever icon you want and no one else is going to be allowed to steal it from you ;')


Offline radioman

  • A Regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 622
Re: U.S. Trademark Office Says ‘Redskins’ is Derogatory
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2014, 01:03:49 PM »
How long has the Washington Redskins been in existence?

Where has these bureaucrats been all these years? Why just now?
TGIF - "Thank God I'm Forgiven"

Offline AlanS

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 7908
  • Proud Infidel
Re: U.S. Trademark Office Says ‘Redskins’ is Derogatory
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2014, 02:04:30 PM »
Shoulda went with “Nigga Hog Rinds,”
"Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem."

Thomas Jefferson

Offline warpmine

  • Conservative Hero
  • ****
  • Posts: 3248
Re: U.S. Trademark Office Says ‘Redskins’ is Derogatory
« Reply #5 on: January 08, 2014, 08:52:10 PM »
Shoulda went with “Nigga Hog Rinds,”
Presidential Condoms for Niggas
Remember, four boxes keep us free:
The soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.

Offline Sectionhand

  • Conservative Hero
  • ****
  • Posts: 2520
Re: U.S. Trademark Office Says ‘Redskins’ is Derogatory
« Reply #6 on: January 09, 2014, 04:31:53 AM »
The Washington Redskins trademark is protected by ex post facto law . The Trademark Office can't touch them .