Author Topic: To each in accordance with what he contributes  (Read 1032 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Septugenarian

  • A Regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 616
To each in accordance with what he contributes
« on: March 13, 2014, 08:52:05 AM »
Income inequality from 1952:

"..today envy is glorified as a virtue. Politicians advocate measures, not because they will bring any material benefit to anyone, but on the ground that they may assuage the public envy which they themselves have helped to inflame."

http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2014/03/13/tbt-heres-an-article-on-americas-obsession-with-income-inequality-from-1952/
I'm entitled (to be cranky).

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 64006
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: To each in accordance with what he contributes
« Reply #1 on: March 13, 2014, 11:20:41 AM »
Lust for OPM began a long time ago...Assclown Wilson brought much of it into the bureaucracy and it's been increasing theft and rewarding sloth ever since...
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline richb

  • Established Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1741
Re: To each in accordance with what he contributes
« Reply #2 on: March 13, 2014, 03:52:35 PM »
"The more things change the more it stays the same." 

Its like that political cartoon from the Chicago Tribune from the 1930's,  about how government overspending was going to collapse society.   How it so fits today,  not like the Tribune of today would bother with printing it.

I have cousins who think any rich person either got lucky (like winning the lottery) cheated or stole their way to wealth.   They don't believe its is grown by business.   Their father (my late uncle) ran a small construction company,  that they all at one time or another worked at.     My uncle really wasn't that great a business guy (frankly he was far too nice).   In spite of being a small business owner,  he was a staunch lifelong Democrat (its how I learned to love irony,  as their best years were the Reagan years,  the president he hated with a passion).  He had plenty on his plate running the place (after he passed,  we realized how much he held his family together,  they just fell apart when he died). 

So  he didn't really go after things that could have grown the business.   Plus he relocated the business to a economically depressed place,  so even if he was a good businessman,  there would never be lots of work.

So it never grew and basically just got by.  Barely.    So they see small business as a huge waste of time.  Only one tried to run his own business and he failed because he is very hard to work with. 

Now I have a second uncle,  same side of the family.   He is a successful businessman,  in real estate investing.   Instead of seeing what made him successful all they do is make negative comments about how he is cheap (he isn't,  not by a long shot).   Or how his father helped him start his business (something his dad did do,  one time,  and something their own father would have done, had they asked..........).     
   
But even their own successful friends (well the ones they haven't driven away) get the same nasty comments about how their wealth came about. 

And yes,  those cousins are all Democrat and Obama voters. 

Offline Glock32

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 8747
  • Get some!
Re: To each in accordance with what he contributes
« Reply #3 on: March 13, 2014, 05:08:29 PM »
And when you strip the argument bare, the core premise is that they have the right to not only your labor, but can compel you to engage in labor should you decide it's no longer worth busting your ass for the benefit of parasites.

That's why the Soviets and other commies came up with the crime of "wrecking".  Not producing as much as you did back when it was for your own gain?  Well that's deliberate wrecking, off to the gulag for you comrade.  It's not exaggeration to call it a form of enslavement, because in essence they are claiming ownership over your time, your talents, your knowledge, your very body.
"The Fourth Estate is less honorable than the First Profession."

- Yours Truly

Offline oldcoastie6468

  • Conservative Hero
  • ****
  • Posts: 2555
Re: To each in accordance with what he contributes
« Reply #4 on: March 13, 2014, 10:06:25 PM »
Its like that political cartoon from the Chicago Tribune from the 1930's,  about how government overspending was going to collapse society. How it so fits today, not like the Tribune of today would bother with printing it.

Is this the one to which you refer?

U.S. Coast Guard veteran, 1964-1968

Will Rogers never met Barack Obama. He would not like Obama.

I hate liberals. Liberalism is a disease that causes severe brain damage after it tries to suck knowledge and history out of yours.

Offline richb

  • Established Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1741
Re: To each in accordance with what he contributes
« Reply #5 on: March 14, 2014, 12:19:04 AM »
Its like that political cartoon from the Chicago Tribune from the 1930's,  about how government overspending was going to collapse society. How it so fits today, not like the Tribune of today would bother with printing it.

Is this the one to which you refer?



That's the one!!!   

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 64006
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: To each in accordance with what he contributes
« Reply #6 on: March 14, 2014, 07:05:25 AM »
And when you strip the argument bare, the core premise is that they have the right to not only your labor, but can compel you to engage in labor should you decide it's no longer worth busting your ass for the benefit of parasites.

That's why the Soviets and other commies came up with the crime of "wrecking".  Not producing as much as you did back when it was for your own gain?  Well that's deliberate wrecking, off to the gulag for you comrade.  It's not exaggeration to call it a form of enslavement, because in essence they are claiming ownership over your time, your talents, your knowledge, your very body.

The lesson the people eventually learned was they can't send everyone to the gulag if everyone decides to stay home and get drunk.
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.