Yep, she looks like and has the resume one would expectHer manuscript, A Taste for Brown Sugar: Black Women, Sex Work and Pornography (forthcoming from Duke University Press in 2014) examines African American women’s representation and labor in pornographic media.
so yes, she is part of the
Pornography is empowering to women crowd.
According to the performers I interviewed, the greatest challenge faced by women who work in the pornography business, in addition to social stigma, is gender and racial inequality. Overwhelmingly, women do not control the production and distribution apparatus of the business. The men who run both the large companies and the smaller, amateur businesses tend to marginalize women’s perspectives and priorities and to foster a competitive environment that pits female workers against one another.
African-American women – and women and men of color in general – are paid half to three-quarters of what white actresses are paid. Like in other kinds of industries, they face prejudice and inequality in structural and interpersonal forms. But they also challenge them. Porn’s workers are fighting to achieve greater control over their labor and the products they produce.
So yeah. Equal Pay for all Black Hoes. She probably thinks they are underrepresented and that we need more black hoes. I hope Obama's Daughters get to attend one of her classes someday.
Any one want's a taste of this brown sugar?
Ugly Bitch.
That is right, if you played "guess that race", you won again.
In Dave Sim's Cerebus there is a point at which he is travelling from town to town, eradicating the "Cirinists" ( feminists) who had taken over the world. He would do this by gathering up all of the men and all of the women in a town and then making the men vote on which women be "angels" and which be "vipers. " The Vipers are summarily executed. Then they come to one with a hyphenated name...
For those with strong stomachs who want to peak into the Abyss
here is what the far left is saying in her defenseCitizens are guaranteed the opportunity to voice their opinions on public property- like the free speech area at UCSB. But private citizens also have the right to evaluate “free speech,” and if needed, remove its platform and speaker under the first amendment. In other words, “freedom of speech” ONLY pertains to direct government intervention. Mireille acted as a private citizen, in the defense of other private citizens. There isn’t a case here.
3) Yes, theft is theft. But now that you stand corrected on your boisterous claim to “freedom of speech,” you can see that removing the sign was akin to a private citizen removing the platform and- by extension- the speech that was deemed offensive by over 2,000 students (at the present moment, at least. Please see petition for UCSB chancellor to issue a statement in support of Mireille).
So, since I find all liberal speech hateful and an avocation of making me a slave, I am entitled, as a civilian, not acting in a government capacity, to take a knife and cut out their tongues, thus depriving them of that platform from which to voice their views and thus protecting myself and other citizens form the disease that is leftism and the harm it does to my culture and everyday life? Sweet.
