Author Topic: FCC Mulling "BAN" of "Redskins" under Obscenity Rules...  (Read 1589 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 67914
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
FCC Mulling "BAN" of "Redskins" under Obscenity Rules...
« on: October 01, 2014, 11:58:27 AM »
FCC Mulling "BAN" of "Redskins" under Obscenity Rules...

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/10/fcc-considers-banning-redskins-under-proposed-obscenity-rules-video/

...yes, because nothing is more offensive than the word "Redskin"!  Not Islaminals in America lopping off heads of innocent people, not their head-lopping heroes overseas (cross-posted here)...not hate-spreading mainstream Imam's in their Mosque's and certainly not the mainstream Muslims eager to act out the tenets of their death-cult!  No, REDSKINS should be banned!  Yeah, that makes perfect sense...IF YOU"RE A FRACKING MORON!!!

 ::pullhair::

 ::laserkill::

 ::machinegun::

 ::viking::
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline Predator Don

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 4576
Re: FCC Mulling "BAN" of "Redskins" under Obscenity Rules...
« Reply #1 on: October 01, 2014, 12:55:59 PM »
Fining newscasts which utter "Redskin" under a proposed new FCC law?  And libs whined that Bush was drunk with power.

It is amazing the difference in what I find obscene and what a liberal finds obscene.
I'm not always engulfed in scandals, but when I am, I make sure I blame others.

Offline Pablo de Fleurs

  • Conservative Hero
  • ****
  • Posts: 3342
    • Apologetics Workshop
Re: FCC Mulling "BAN" of "Redskins" under Obscenity Rules...
« Reply #2 on: October 01, 2014, 03:10:36 PM »
I happen to agree. "Redskins" is highly offensive...

...I much prefer "Injun B*tch Nation" or the "Muf-Fuhking Squaws"
2 Timothy 1:7
For God did not give us a spirit of timidity, but of power & of love and of calm, a well-balanced mind, discipline and self-control.

Offline richb

  • Established Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1748
Re: FCC Mulling "BAN" of "Redskins" under Obscenity Rules...
« Reply #3 on: October 03, 2014, 01:58:00 AM »
*** ****** ****** ** ****   *******   ****** **** *** *****   ****** ****** ***** ***** ***** ****** **** ******
***** ******* ****** ******* ***** ***** ***** **** **** ***** ****** ****** ***** ****** *******  ***** ** ***
**** **** ******* *** **** **** ***** ****

(please note:  comments by richb censored by the "we know better then you" US government, we don't want his comments to offend a liberal indian or something) 

Offline Glock32

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 8747
  • Get some!
Re: FCC Mulling "BAN" of "Redskins" under Obscenity Rules...
« Reply #4 on: October 03, 2014, 10:35:38 AM »
Rich your comment made me think of another way to send them a message....




"The Fourth Estate is less honorable than the First Profession."

- Yours Truly

Offline John Florida

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 10059
  • IT'S MY FONT AND I'LL USE IT IF I WANT TO!!
Re: FCC Mulling "BAN" of "Redskins" under Obscenity Rules...
« Reply #5 on: October 03, 2014, 10:44:42 AM »
  Dunp the whole dept and say goodbye.
All men are created equal"
 Filippo Mazzie

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 67914
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: FCC Mulling "BAN" of "Redskins" under Obscenity Rules...
« Reply #6 on: October 03, 2014, 11:39:41 AM »
Rich your comment made me think of another way to send them a message....






I sure hope that spells out   ::vafancoul::
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline Pablo de Fleurs

  • Conservative Hero
  • ****
  • Posts: 3342
    • Apologetics Workshop
Re: FCC Mulling "BAN" of "Redskins" under Obscenity Rules...
« Reply #7 on: October 03, 2014, 12:56:01 PM »



.

[It's the 'Thin-Skins' wot this'uhm...bothers]

« Last Edit: October 03, 2014, 01:05:52 PM by Pablo de Fleurs »
2 Timothy 1:7
For God did not give us a spirit of timidity, but of power & of love and of calm, a well-balanced mind, discipline and self-control.

Offline richb

  • Established Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1748
Re: FCC Mulling "BAN" of "Redskins" under Obscenity Rules...
« Reply #8 on: October 03, 2014, 02:57:31 PM »
We better watch out,  some "enlightened" liberal may come along and complain that smoke signals are racccccisssssttttt. 

You just know they would!   ha ha ha ha ha ha

How the h*ll did the world turn insane so fast?

Offline warpmine

  • Conservative Hero
  • ****
  • Posts: 3248
Re: FCC Mulling "BAN" of "Redskins" under Obscenity Rules...
« Reply #9 on: October 03, 2014, 05:30:31 PM »
No problem, there will be a world war and the fighting along with accompanying starvation will kill in the billions. Checkmate.
Remember, four boxes keep us free:
The soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 67914
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: FCC Mulling "BAN" of "Redskins" under Obscenity Rules...
« Reply #10 on: October 06, 2014, 07:06:14 AM »
Maybe there is something to those Georgia Guidestones after all....

All part of the illuminati design?

Whatever, everything will get sorted out one way or another...
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline BigAlSouth

  • Established Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1581
  • Who won't 'co-exist?'
Re: FCC Mulling "BAN" of "Redskins" under Obscenity Rules...
« Reply #11 on: October 08, 2014, 05:07:36 PM »
Question: How many legs would a dog have if his tail was a leg?
Answer: Four. Just because you call a tail a leg doesn't make it so.

Same for "Redskins." Just because the FCC says the word is "obscene" doesn't make it so.
The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living
are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.
--------------
The enemy of my enemy is my friend; the friend of my enemy is, well, he is just a dumbass.

Offline richb

  • Established Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1748
Re: FCC Mulling "BAN" of "Redskins" under Obscenity Rules...
« Reply #12 on: October 09, 2014, 02:11:21 AM »


Same for "Redskins." Just because the FCC says the word is "obscene" doesn't make it so.

But it prevent anyone from saying "redskins" on the air.    That is what sucks about it,  because it adds to the pressure to change the name. How long can any business go when you cannot say your name? 

Remember, this is the same agency that once banned the word "fart" from the airwaves.    So what moral authority do they have?

Offline AlanS

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 7908
  • Proud Infidel
Re: FCC Mulling "BAN" of "Redskins" under Obscenity Rules...
« Reply #13 on: October 09, 2014, 05:34:14 AM »
I say we name them after all of the Washington transplants and call them foreskins.
"Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem."

Thomas Jefferson

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 67914
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: FCC Mulling "BAN" of "Redskins" under Obscenity Rules...
« Reply #14 on: October 09, 2014, 07:01:19 AM »
Frankly, maybe the rancid play-by-play from these morons calling the telecasts could improved if instead of saying "Redskins" they put that "Beep" noise in there instead...it would be funny, everybody would still know who the Redskins are and the PCer's would look like a bunch of bed-wetting crybabies...which they are!
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.