Ban it now, for the children.
Post by mnhawk on Dec 9, 2010, 10:22am
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/12/08/co....he-u-s-economy/Dihydrogen Monoxide goes Cancun! Keep in mind, every single person who signed the petition calling for "seeks to lower the U.S. GDP by 6% over a ten year period, unless the U.S. signs a U.N. treaty on global warming" also signed the petition to "Ban the Use of Dihydrogen Monoxide (DHMO)."
Space reserved for Poly Sci retard to lecture the rest of us anti-science wingnuts...
>
>
>
>
Re: Ban it now, for the children.
Post by irondiopriest on Dec 9, 2010, 10:58am
Hopefully we'll get around to banning Leftards at some point.
Re: Ban it now, for the children.
Post by johnflorida on Dec 9, 2010, 11:51am
And were the Knucle draggers?
Re: Ban it now, for the children.
Post by glock32 on Dec 9, 2010, 2:09pm
Dihydrogen monoxide is also responsible for more child deaths every year than guns. But dihydrogen monoxide is almost completely unrestricted and available all over the country.
Re: Ban it now, for the children.
Post by libertasinfinitio on Dec 10, 2010, 8:36am
B-b-b-b-but what about the innocent mammals that depend upon Dihydrogen Monoxide?! What about them?!
(Pic courtesy of DC )
http://dailycaller.com/2010/12/10/hypocr....ate-conference/Re: Ban it now, for the children.
Post by alans on Dec 10, 2010, 12:37pm
Dec 10, 2010, 8:36am, libertasinfinitio wrote:
(Pic courtesy of DC )
http://dailycaller.com/2010/12/10/hypocr....ate-conference/Is that a Cap and Trade pic?
Re: Ban it now, for the children.
Post by glock32 on Dec 10, 2010, 8:53pm
Look at those plastic sheet covers they used. Don't they know those are going to be in a landfill for 700 billion years? And that they came from petroleum feed stock?
Re: Ban it now, for the children.
Post by nolan on Dec 10, 2010, 9:03pm
Good eye for detail re: the plastic covers. Too funny!
And they are in perfect position for the ass-kickin' they deserve.
