Some people take the position that they “don’t have anything to hide,” but he argued that when you say that, “You’re inverting the model of responsibility for how rights work”:
[blockquote]"When you say, ‘I have nothing to hide,’ you’re saying, ‘I don’t care about this right.’ You’re saying, ‘I don’t have this right, because I’ve got to the point where I have to justify it.’ The way rights work is, the government has to justify its intrusion into your rights."[/blockquote]
Either he's on our side, or he's faking it for some nefarious reason. The fact that his asylum came from Russia is suspect. Which nation (aside from the United States, that is) stands to benefit more from Snowden's revelations than Russia?
But when our own government is in the clutches of a domestic enemy, "anywhere but here" is the logical place for Snowden to run. Russia is even more logical, since the US has no muscle to force extradition.
What is worse? The implications of Russia having knowledge of our government secretly spying on its own citizens in order that the American people be made aware? Or the implications of our government secretly spying on its own citizens continuing to go undetected?
It seems to me like fleeing to Russia could very well have been a calculated decision that comports entirely with the goal of revealing our government's own treason to the American people.