Speaking of betrayal:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/06/ig-report-fbi-no-bias-conclusion-may-not-supported/Andy McCarthy: "The trick here is the premise the IG establishes from the start: It’s not my job to draw firm conclusions about why things happened the way they did. In fact,
it’s not even my job to determine whether investigative decisions were right or wrong. The cop-out is that we are dealing here with “discretionary” calls; therefore, the IG rationalizes, the investigators must be given very broad latitude. Consequently, the IG says his job is not to determine whether any particular decision was correct; just whether, on some otherworldly scale of reasonableness, the decision was defensible. And he makes that determination by looking at every decision in isolation."
There have been committee meetings and investigations and their end result is always a shrug of the shoulders with a 'we dunno wha' happened'.
Dots are connected and WE SEE THEM and draw sane conclusions and this 'we dunno ....' is what the "experts" present to us as though it is WE that are seeing things that aren't there.
And they wonder why people are offing themselves.