Topics > 2nd Amendment/Firearms

Gun bill introduced by....Republicans

<< < (2/2)

John Florida:
   Way to broad this needs to be specific to a named item.. Bump stocks to me serve no purpose in my life so if they go I don't cre but if they try to use them to broadly cover whatever may come to mind is out. 

   What happens if my finger is faster than other people do they ban my finger??? Not joking either.

Glock32:
Exactly, it's like MAC said in that video, if a certain rate of fire is deemed to be "normal" then does that mean competition target triggers with a short take up now count as "rate increasers"?

Will anything lighter than a 20 pound trigger with 3 inches of take up be considered a rate increasing device?  By the language of the bill, it could be if some regulatory asshats decided so.  And that would be a question of when, not if.

This is particularly troublesome to be introduced by a Republican in a Republican-controlled Congress with a Republican in the White House. A lot of these sh1theads might be inclined to vote for it, thinking they have some sort of implicit permission since "our side" is in charge.

Libertas:
NRA idiots do it again...

http://zelmanpartisans.com/?p=5539

Words don't matter, they can be twisted to match NFI descriptions...making it easier to ban certain elements now...and everything later.

The time to accept the label of "lawless" "outlaw" and "rebel" are upon us.  Being called thus by fascists should be viewed as an honor.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page