Look at this BS form my Google Pocket-propaganda feed
https://frenchpress.thedispatch.com/p/the-presidential-election-was-legitimate?utm_source=pocket-newtabIn order to debunk a theory - you actually have to address the claim - NOT set up strawmen ( a fallacy) and then knock them down
" Should I be suspicious about the fact that the vote counting is taking so long?"
It not only is taking long - it was SUSPICIOUSLY HALTED. Poll watchers were told to go home and counting resumed. Poll watchers were not allowed entry - and were kept too far away from the process for them to see it - at one point windows looking into the room were boarded up. Eyewitnesses show a drop off of new ballots when everyone was told the last ballots has arrived.
" Should I be suspicious that mail-in ballots are overwhelmingly Democratic? No."
No you should be suspicious of them when the ratio of GOP/DEM votes CHANGES -- the mail shuffles the mail in ballots. The ratio of GOP to DEM should not change much over time. If anything it should skew to Trump as rural area mail would come in later.. The Sudden bump of 23,000 ballots all for Biden was IN MAIL IN VOTES that were mixed together. But don't worrk there a plausible explaination
" Election officials and vote tabulators occasionally enter results one candidate at a time, and it looks like that’s what happened here,” said Bycoffe. “That would explain why Trump had zero votes in this one update. His votes would have been added in a subsequent update.”"
Wouldn't we see similarly large bumps for Trump because all of his votes were being updated at once then? We don't? And would the general slope of the curve be unaffected..because the changes would average out? Hmm. Only happens with Joe Biden
When all accounting and clerical errors and updates all occur in one way -- that is a sign of Fraud.
Should I be suspicious of the extraordinary turnout numbers in swing states?
But it is extraordinary turn out in JUST THOSE COUNTIES where democrats are using illegal measures to count the votes. An overly high turn out when compared to surrounding areas or other places with similar politcal demographics is suspicious to say the least
Okay, but I’ve heard that Republicans have been barred from observing the count. Is that true? No. It is true that there have been disputes about the number of observers and their proximity to the count (and observers have been permitted to approach closer to the count), but Republicans are not on the outside, looking in as election workers do their job
This is a bald faced lie. They were not allowed entry after counting resumed in some places - Democrat officials cited "occupancy violations" and were EXCLUDING GOP watchers. Other watches were indeed inside the room - but excluding anyone while under the citied limit was ILLEGAL.. that is WHY they were banging on the windows.
Wait. It looks like there were multiple jurisdictions where down-ballot Republicans received more votes than the president. Isn’t that suspicious? No. It’s evidence of the existence of one of the most talked-about constituencies in American politics—the Never Trump conservative.
THe never trump conservative would have voted Conservative on the OTHER candidates. Did they? The house returns suggest they did -- but the margin different between th house returns and the Ballots that are just Biden with no corresponding down vote -- don't add up.
Finally it s a candidate's right to challenge the results that is why WE HAVE COURTS. If there is Fraud Trump gets a chance to prove it in court. So sit down and shut up A hole and stop trying to tell people what to think - especially when all you do is set up straw men and tell BLATANT lies about what is actually occurring in those voting centers - We have sworn affidavits from eyewitnesses as well as Video SHOWING that GOP poll watchers are barred and that others were allowed to bring in bags and coolers without security. And That all by itself is enough to invalidate the results.
