Author Topic: The answer to reform BigMedia is to slap a huge anti-trust charge on them  (Read 1637 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 47822
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6714353/Trump-says-Alec-Baldwins-Saturday-night-Live-parody-looked-into.html

I would argue a RICO case as well, based upon their willful and coordinated information terrorism!

Break them!!!  Do it!!!
Irrumabo!  GOP? - Nope. No more. They made their bed, now let them die in it.*
* © Libertas (H/T Glock32)

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 47822
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: The answer to reform BigMedia is to slap a huge anti-trust charge on them
« Reply #1 on: February 19, 2019, 07:44:55 AM »
https://www.mediaite.com/online/cbss-lara-logan-calls-media-mostly-liberal-in-scorched-earth-interview-im-committing-professional-suicide/

Making my case.  They will never reform themselves, they need to be broken up first.  And penalties for disinformation, lies...as well as libel and slander laws beefed up need to happen yesterday!
Irrumabo!  GOP? - Nope. No more. They made their bed, now let them die in it.*
* © Libertas (H/T Glock32)

Offline Lou22

  • Newb
  • *
  • Posts: 44
Re: The answer to reform BigMedia is to slap a huge anti-trust charge on them
« Reply #2 on: February 19, 2019, 04:18:05 PM »
Absolutely. Freedom of speech was never intended to mean that the media can be biased one way or the other. Break 'em up, diossolve 'em, lock 'em up if they resist.  There's more than one swamp that needs draining.

Online Pandora

  • Administrator
  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 17524
  • I iz also makin a list. U on it pal.
Re: The answer to reform BigMedia is to slap a huge anti-trust charge on them
« Reply #3 on: February 19, 2019, 04:47:50 PM »
Absolutely. Freedom of speech was never intended to mean that the media can be biased one way or the other. Break 'em up, diossolve 'em, lock 'em up if they resist.  There's more than one swamp that needs draining.

The press has always been biased, one way or the other.  The difference in the past was that both sides were represented and were very clear about which side they favored.
"Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer." - Mark Twain

"Let us assume for the moment everything you say about me is true. That just makes your problem bigger, doesn't it?"

Online ToddF

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 4891
Re: The answer to reform BigMedia is to slap a huge anti-trust charge on them
« Reply #4 on: February 20, 2019, 06:34:42 AM »
They're very free to be biased.  I, as well as President Trump, are also very free to call them out on their fraud, and to mock them at every step.

People are also very free to sue them, when they go over the line and commit libel.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 47822
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: The answer to reform BigMedia is to slap a huge anti-trust charge on them
« Reply #5 on: February 20, 2019, 07:57:56 AM »
Way heavily tilted, and naked as hell and not hiding it.  I got in a running verbal battle with the editors at the Red Star over two decades ago...miserable SOB's editing my submissions for LTTE, started changing the essence and very meaning of what I intended, lit their asses up, kept hounding them, then they did their usual cowardly thing and ignored me.  I did some stuff after that of an anonymous nature, took pleasure watching their subscriptions melt, their staffing shrink.  The editing, the bias-slant...that's the soft censorship and disinformation...the blackballing of voices, the shutting down of interaction, manufactured polling, incestuous use of experts and attention-whores...that's crossing into hard censorship and manipulation.  Socialist Media is even worse with it, since it has largely replaced the old media for many, Google, Twitter, Facebook etc...they are the Gestapo of the Goebbels Media.  They deserve no quarter, no mercy!  They deserve Liberty Poles, tar & feathering, being run out on a rail or put in a pillory...at the least!

This is a start - https://itsaboutliberty.com/index.php/topic,16870.new.html#new

And I think a NYT v Sullivan reversal is problematic and the very least under the Dread Traitor Roberts Court...but to get at the wider perfidy of BigMedia is going to call for a big-ass hammer like Anti-Trust and RICO cases...or we just settle it with everything else when the flare goes up and CWII goes kinetic.

Either way, the time for all fascisti is drawing ever shorter!
« Last Edit: February 20, 2019, 08:23:56 AM by Libertas »
Irrumabo!  GOP? - Nope. No more. They made their bed, now let them die in it.*
* © Libertas (H/T Glock32)

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 47822
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: The answer to reform BigMedia is to slap a huge anti-trust charge on them
« Reply #6 on: February 21, 2019, 07:06:44 AM »
Oh sorry, didn't mean to!

https://www.businessinsider.com/nest-microphone-was-never-supposed-to-be-a-secret-2019-2

All is well?  Uh, yeah...umm, no!

What they meant was "Oh, caught that did ya? What's the big deal?".

Just giving the customer DeepState what they want.
Irrumabo!  GOP? - Nope. No more. They made their bed, now let them die in it.*
* © Libertas (H/T Glock32)

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 47822
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: The answer to reform BigMedia is to slap a huge anti-trust charge on them
« Reply #7 on: February 28, 2019, 10:59:31 AM »
I look with justified skepticism on any FTC efforts...that body is too political and too toothless.

It's not just FascistBook it is all socialist media and 90% of presscorpse and most of the BigTech giants.  They all need to be broken apart.  And penalties for slander, libel and and lying and manipulating have to be immediate and severe.

Otherwise people are just admitting they are not serious about the problem.
Irrumabo!  GOP? - Nope. No more. They made their bed, now let them die in it.*
* © Libertas (H/T Glock32)

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 47822
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Irrumabo!  GOP? - Nope. No more. They made their bed, now let them die in it.*
* © Libertas (H/T Glock32)

Online Pandora

  • Administrator
  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 17524
  • I iz also makin a list. U on it pal.
"Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer." - Mark Twain

"Let us assume for the moment everything you say about me is true. That just makes your problem bigger, doesn't it?"

Offline Lou22

  • Newb
  • *
  • Posts: 44
Absolutely. Freedom of speech was never intended to mean that the media can be biased one way or the other. Break 'em up, diossolve 'em, lock 'em up if they resist.  There's more than one swamp that needs draining.

The press has always been biased, one way or the other.  The difference in the past was that both sides were represented and were very clear about which side they favored.

Exactly. The way that they're behaving now is totally unprecedented. I cannot wait for Trump to have Jake Tapper arrested for disrespecting the government and lying to the people.

Online Pandora

  • Administrator
  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 17524
  • I iz also makin a list. U on it pal.
Absolutely. Freedom of speech was never intended to mean that the media can be biased one way or the other. Break 'em up, diossolve 'em, lock 'em up if they resist.  There's more than one swamp that needs draining.

The press has always been biased, one way or the other.  The difference in the past was that both sides were represented and were very clear about which side they favored.

Exactly. The way that they're behaving now is totally unprecedented. I cannot wait for Trump to have Jake Tapper arrested for disrespecting the government and lying to the people.

This is the USA, not Russia, Venezuela or China, so what you're suggesting is not done for those reasons.

Jeez, kid, what's up witchoo?
"Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer." - Mark Twain

"Let us assume for the moment everything you say about me is true. That just makes your problem bigger, doesn't it?"

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 47822
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!


https://qposts.online/post/2995

https://sputniknews.com/us/201903071073021386-zuckerberg-plans-build-privacy-focused-facebook/?utm_source=https://qposts.online/&utm_medium=short_url&utm_content=kSJj&utm_campaign=URL_shortening

So, he admits he wasn't "privacy-based" before?  Gosh, thanks for the heads up Markie!  What's next?  Admitting you blacklist non-progressive voices?  Yeah, I bet BigBroBook 2.0 going to have even better government access and blacklist capability than 1.0!

What a POS!  Why is this fraud not in prison?

Oh yeah...right ideological connections!

PS-Seen that FB/Lifelog info before...priceless...and not surprising...always easier to let a "private" entity be the front of a government op than a government agency!

Fools most of the ::bus:: public.
Irrumabo!  GOP? - Nope. No more. They made their bed, now let them die in it.*
* © Libertas (H/T Glock32)

Online John Florida

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 9142
  • IT'S MY FONT AND I'LL USE IT IF I WANT TO!!
 I just stay off FB and any other platform like if.
All men are created equal"
 Filippo Mazzie

Offline Lou22

  • Newb
  • *
  • Posts: 44
Absolutely. Freedom of speech was never intended to mean that the media can be biased one way or the other. Break 'em up, diossolve 'em, lock 'em up if they resist.  There's more than one swamp that needs draining.

The press has always been biased, one way or the other.  The difference in the past was that both sides were represented and were very clear about which side they favored.

Exactly. The way that they're behaving now is totally unprecedented. I cannot wait for Trump to have Jake Tapper arrested for disrespecting the government and lying to the people.

This is the USA, not Russia, Venezuela or China, so what you're suggesting is not done for those reasons.

Jeez, kid, what's up witchoo?

Then why did the founders specifically lay out a section on Treason in the Constitution? IMO severely underused.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 47822
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Absolutely. Freedom of speech was never intended to mean that the media can be biased one way or the other. Break 'em up, diossolve 'em, lock 'em up if they resist.  There's more than one swamp that needs draining.

The press has always been biased, one way or the other.  The difference in the past was that both sides were represented and were very clear about which side they favored.

Exactly. The way that they're behaving now is totally unprecedented. I cannot wait for Trump to have Jake Tapper arrested for disrespecting the government and lying to the people.

This is the USA, not Russia, Venezuela or China, so what you're suggesting is not done for those reasons.

Jeez, kid, what's up witchoo?

Then why did the founders specifically lay out a section on Treason in the Constitution? IMO severely underused.

Jeez, Lou...go read Article III, Section 3...it lays out what has to be done, and it would be a trial by jury in Federal Court...find a Prosecutor willing to give it a go and bring another collaborating witness with you.  The burden to prove that is high...but go for it, I'll cheer you on.  IMO best and quickest way is to go for their power and pocketbook.
Irrumabo!  GOP? - Nope. No more. They made their bed, now let them die in it.*
* © Libertas (H/T Glock32)

Online Pandora

  • Administrator
  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 17524
  • I iz also makin a list. U on it pal.
Absolutely. Freedom of speech was never intended to mean that the media can be biased one way or the other. Break 'em up, diossolve 'em, lock 'em up if they resist.  There's more than one swamp that needs draining.

The press has always been biased, one way or the other.  The difference in the past was that both sides were represented and were very clear about which side they favored.

Exactly. The way that they're behaving now is totally unprecedented. I cannot wait for Trump to have Jake Tapper arrested for disrespecting the government and lying to the people.

This is the USA, not Russia, Venezuela or China, so what you're suggesting is not done for those reasons.

Jeez, kid, what's up witchoo?

Then why did the founders specifically lay out a section on Treason in the Constitution? IMO severely underused.

You go find me, specifically, the "section" of the Constitution that lays out the President's authority to arrest a Jake Tapper or any other news-person on the grounds of Treason for "disrespecting the government and lying to the people".
"Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer." - Mark Twain

"Let us assume for the moment everything you say about me is true. That just makes your problem bigger, doesn't it?"

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 47822
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
I guess the crickets won that challenge, eh?

Irrumabo!  GOP? - Nope. No more. They made their bed, now let them die in it.*
* © Libertas (H/T Glock32)

Online Pandora

  • Administrator
  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 17524
  • I iz also makin a list. U on it pal.
I guess the crickets won that challenge, eh?

You calling me a cricket?   ::saywhat::

I don't mind questioning, but that's not what he's doing, he's being a Gamma.
"Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer." - Mark Twain

"Let us assume for the moment everything you say about me is true. That just makes your problem bigger, doesn't it?"

Offline Lou22

  • Newb
  • *
  • Posts: 44
Absolutely. Freedom of speech was never intended to mean that the media can be biased one way or the other. Break 'em up, diossolve 'em, lock 'em up if they resist.  There's more than one swamp that needs draining.

The press has always been biased, one way or the other.  The difference in the past was that both sides were represented and were very clear about which side they favored.

Exactly. The way that they're behaving now is totally unprecedented. I cannot wait for Trump to have Jake Tapper arrested for disrespecting the government and lying to the people.

This is the USA, not Russia, Venezuela or China, so what you're suggesting is not done for those reasons.

Jeez, kid, what's up witchoo?

Then why did the founders specifically lay out a section on Treason in the Constitution? IMO severely underused.

Jeez, Lou...go read Article III, Section 3...it lays out what has to be done, and it would be a trial by jury in Federal Court...find a Prosecutor willing to give it a go and bring another collaborating witness with you.  The burden to prove that is high...but go for it, I'll cheer you on.  IMO best and quickest way is to go for their power and pocketbook.

President Trump is in charge appointing district attorneys. He needs to fire the lot of them and appoint the ones which will do the work that needs to be done, by FIXING the evil lying media.