Author Topic: The Feminazi take on #MeToo after the high-profile cases  (Read 10096 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 67914
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
The Feminazi take on #MeToo after the high-profile cases
« on: August 30, 2019, 12:30:27 PM »
Batshyt-crazy moonbat feminazi is all over the map on this, as one would expect from any moonbat.

It looks like Mike Pence is quite the trendsetter. The US vice-president famously refuses to have dinner alone with any woman who isn’t his wife – and now working men across corporate America appear to be following his lead.

A new study, due to be published in the journal Organizational Dynamics, has found that, following the #MeToo movement, men are significantly more reluctant to interact with their female colleagues. A few highlights from the research include:

• 27% of men avoid one-on-one meetings with female co-workers. Yep, that’s right, almost a third of men are terrified to be alone in a room with a woman.

• 21% of men said they would be reluctant to hire women for a job that would require close interaction (such as business travel).

• 19% of men would be reluctant to hire an attractive woman.


https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/aug/29/men-women-workplace-study-harassment-harvard-metoo

No shyt?

Since the socialist social-engineers gave us all the ingredients necessary: emasculating and demonizing men (especially white sexually-normal men) for every evil imaginable, allowing sexually-abnormal people to twist kids into fellow activist abnormal's, demonizing normal's, hijacking and perverting our language and meanings into weapons to elevate abnormal's and silence normal's, weaponizing schools with all manner of progressive rot, weaponizing government with progressive/statist drones, migrating the politics of personal destruction from politics to corporations and establishing the precedent that all allegations are convictions no matter what the truth may be later on as long as it advances the progressive agenda...is it any real mystery as to why this reaction is occurring?

I think we know what this feminazi's take will be, let's explore it, shall we?

It’s not just men who are afraid of women, by the way. Women also appear to be increasingly wary of hiring women. The 2018 survey results found that more than 10% of men and women said they expected to be less willing than before to hire attractive women. (Note: the 2019 results for women are not yet public.) Internalized misogyny really is a bitch.

See how the batshyt-crazy infection warps minds?  Not only are beta drones (beta-males) to blame...but their fellow non-feminazi-compliant alpha women. 

More?  OK, look at this twisted logic -

“The idea that men don’t know their behavior is bad and that women are making a mountain out of a molehill is largely untrue. If anything, women are more lenient in defining harassment.”

Ha!  The insanity of these fgeminazi zealots is stunning!  Of course men know bad behavior from good!  By trying to link that to men being wrongfully accused and literally persecuted (Duke LaCrosse team, Tawany Brawley...Judge Kavanaugh to name a few!) as a mere molehill is intellectually stunted at the core!  And to go on to say men should submit (inshalla!) to the benevolence of the woman before them in these matters shows their clear and unmistakable aim is to shed all men of any decision-making authority in all matters!

Doubt me?  Let's see!

Which makes you wonder why so many men are afraid to interact with women at work?

The answer to that question, perhaps, is that a lot of men aren’t so much afraid of being accused of anything as they are they are angry that #MeToo ever happened. They’re angry that they’ve been made to think about their behavior, made to interrogate power dynamics they always took for granted, and they are punishing women for it by refusing to interact with them.


Boom!  "Power dynamics", there you have it!  It's always about power!  The feminazi movement was NEVER about "equality", it's about power, and not just "power" but dictatorial power!  And they prove it by closing as always with bullying - "punishing women"!  WTF lady?  Why is it punishment for men to not to be wrongfully accused of something just because you think they deserve to be destroyed for failing to yield to your superior authority?  I would think not having to interact with men at all would be your ideal state!  Oh, but that isn't quite accurate now, is it?  What you really want is to only lord over beta-male drones...it's the alpha's you want to be rid of, admit it you coward!  I know you spout that with your fellow feminazi's!

Where do you double-down at to close your pathetic screed?  Power?  Victimhood?  Bullying?

It’s worth noting, I think, that the Harvard Business Review article previewing the study’s 2019 results is headlined The #MeToo Backlash. You see that phrase a lot and that framing subtly implies that #MeToo went too far, that a backlash is only natural. It’s yet another form of victim-blaming; another way to quietly put women back in their place.

Ahh, all of the above!  Typical.  Poor me, victimized again, and it's all your fault!  Ha!  You are pathetic and prove my points so well this post literally wrote itself!

You are not a woman...you are a cancer...and you'll burn yourself out and all around you...it's a matter of when not if.

We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.