Some other intel guy speculated that UK killed Navalny.
Some Berlin blood work years ago indicated he was not a well man.
His lawyer visited him 2 days before death.
Former CIA Ray Mcgovern said Obama did not want to send lethal weapons to Ukr because it might make them think they could win against Russia. Merkle said it would be a terrible idea in public.
In 2015 someone said/wrote that if war in Ukr that played to Russian strength. Anything we gave to Ukr would be matched, then doubled, then tripled, then quadrupled by Russia. Who? Then deputy US SOS Blinken.
Former US ambassador Burns wrote his famous (leaked) memo saying that inviting Ukr into NATO was a red line and would likely provoke Russia to war. In 2008? Later as CIA director he said the RU invasion was unprovoked.
https://t.me/kalibratedchat/320115🇷🇺🇺🇦 JUST IN: The head of the Main Intelligence Directorate of Ukraine, Kyrylo Budanov, said that, according to Ukrainian intelligence, Alexey Navalny actually died due to a blood clot.
🐻 You don't say... We thought Putin killed him, that's what Western Media has been SCREAMING for the past week.
Could it be possible that a certain US based pharmaceutical company killed Navalny? 🤷
A link to the McGovern video. He gives a summary of recent history leading up to SMO. I knew it all before.
https://youtu.be/XcIHchh7Bac Ex-CIA: US Pentagon TERRIFIED Over New Russia Strike Plan On Ukraine
Stephen Gardner
[They shopped the piece below around to major media for 10 days and no one would touch it so they posted it below]https://consortiumnews.com/2024/02/16/throwing-good-money-after-bad-in-ukraine/Throwing Good Money After Bad in Ukraine?
February 16, 2024
Ray McGovern and Lawrence Wilkerson argue the U.S. should accept that no amount of U.S. funding will change
Russia’s will and means to prevail in Ukraine.
...
Ray McGovern and Lawrence Wilkerson argue the U.S. should accept that no amount of U.S. funding will change Russia’s will and means to prevail in Ukraine.