Author Topic: Hey, Who's Up For A Presidential Debate Live Blog? (Read 20218 times)

Libertas · « **Reply #60 on:** August 11, 2011, 09:06:32 PM »

Punting is his bread & butter.

trapeze · « **Reply #61 on:** August 11, 2011, 09:07:35 PM »

Romney on Afghanistan: Sez we draw down in two years. Good luck with that. Throws the responsibility on the generals. That's not leading.

Libertas · « **Reply #62 on:** August 11, 2011, 09:07:52 PM »

Romney - Afghanization!

Like Vietnamization, it's a loser!

trapeze · « **Reply #63 on:** August 11, 2011, 09:09:44 PM »

Newt complaining about Bret's question. Bad form.

Tries to validate his conflicting statements but mainly just bitches about the question.

Baer tries again to get him to answer. Newt defers to a quote from a general. Sez we need to re-think everything. That's a dodge.

Libertas · « **Reply #64 on:** August 11, 2011, 09:10:38 PM »

A better dodge than T-Paw's, but yes a dodge.

trapeze · « **Reply #65 on:** August 11, 2011, 09:10:51 PM »

Huntsman on cyber attacks from China. Sez its an act of war. Good luck with that.

States known facts, not answers or strategy. About what you would expect from a diplomat.

Libertas · « **Reply #66 on:** August 11, 2011, 09:11:44 PM »

He'd kick the problem to Foggy Bottom where it would die of inertia.

trapeze · « **Reply #67 on:** August 11, 2011, 09:12:26 PM »

Pawlenty on Iran. Sanctions. Yuck. What is "every plausible step?"

Attacks BO on Syria. At least he's taking it to BO. Defends Israel. Gets good applause.

Libertas · « **Reply #68 on:** August 11, 2011, 09:13:19 PM »

Advocating the same policy toward Iran as Duh Wun? Dumb.

charlesoakwood · « **Reply #69 on:** August 11, 2011, 09:13:29 PM »

Says we're going to have to deal with China for the next 20 years....

No Johnny, My President says China will have to deal with us for ever.

trapeze · « **Reply #70 on:** August 11, 2011, 09:14:13 PM »

Paul on Iran. This should be stinky.

No evidence that Iran is working on the bomb. Sure. Go with that.

This guy can never be president if he can't see an obvious enemy. Paulbots go nuts.

Libertas · « **Reply #71 on:** August 11, 2011, 09:14:39 PM »

Paul the hardcore isolationist...

...Paulbots go ape...

trapeze · « **Reply #72 on:** August 11, 2011, 09:15:56 PM »

Santorum understands the Iranian threat. Makes Paul look stupid, because he is on this topic. Paul is advocating the destruction of Israel by proxy.

Libertas · « **Reply #73 on:** August 11, 2011, 09:16:41 PM »

Whoa, Santorum PO'd at Paul over Iran, been at war with us since 1979, got that right.

Paul blames us because we led the coup in the 50's?

Hardcore isolationist boob!

trapeze · « **Reply #74 on:** August 11, 2011, 09:18:02 PM »

Cain on energy strategy. Good answer that energy policy is PART of national security. Bombs, bullets and economics.

Very good answer tying energy strategy to foreign policy. Good applause.

trapeze · « **Reply #75 on:** August 11, 2011, 09:19:56 PM »

Bachmann responds to terrorists having "rights" hits it out of the park. On Iran, totally understands the threat. Paul believes terrorists have rights. Idiot.

Libertas · « **Reply #76 on:** August 11, 2011, 09:20:36 PM »

Paul like Obama thinks it is a criminal issue, not a war!

Libertas · « **Reply #77 on:** August 11, 2011, 09:21:03 PM »

Thank you Rick!

Libertas · « **Reply #78 on:** August 11, 2011, 09:22:25 PM »

Paul - I'm a pussy and I hate war blah blah blah...what a complete effing moron!

trapeze · « **Reply #79 on:** August 11, 2011, 09:22:33 PM »

Santorum understands the Iranian threat. Paul responds that Iran isn't really a threat. Makes himself out to be a nut.

Author Topic: Hey, Who's Up For A Presidential Debate Live Blog? (Read 20218 times)

charlesoakwood