...Is this of some help?
Yes, some. It does seem extremely convoluted. I still don't get how this:
[blockquote]The judge ruled in the cases of Kay and Wayne Craig, owners of Grassway Organics Farm Store; and Mark and Petra Zinniker. (The cases had been consolidated into a single case.) They sought to distribute raw milk through farm stores to herdshare owners, and also argued that their stores didn’t require retail permits from Wisconsin’s Department of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection’s (DATCP). The judge ruled against them on all counts.[/blockquote]
Turns into this:
[blockquote]He also states that any claim to consume the foods of one’s choice is “totally without merit.” Why? Because “arguments unsupported by references to legal authority will not be considered.” In other words, because no legislature or judge has declared such a right previously, he is prohibited from declaring such a right now.[/blockquote]
Where does it say they were demanding the right to consume food of their own choice? It looks to me like the question before the court was whether they could sell raw milk, and whether they needed a permit to sell it.