Author Topic: US city OKs 'bird-safe' building standard  (Read 485 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline warpmine

  • Conservative Hero
  • ****
  • Posts: 3248
US city OKs 'bird-safe' building standard
« on: September 25, 2011, 09:58:42 AM »
See if you can guess which city it is.

___________________ is for the birds — at least its new buildings will be.

An ordinance approved Tuesday by the Board of Supervisors requires that new buildings in parts of the city use "bird-safe" standards that reduce the risk of winged creatures hitting panes of glass.

Advocates say that hundreds of millions of birds die each year after flying into glass windows or walls in the USA, and that _____________'s action will boost efforts to encourage bird-safe buildings nationally.

"It's a global problem," says Christine Sheppard, bird collisions campaign manager for the American Bird Conservancy. "Everywhere you find glass, you will find dead birds. One of the reasons that people don't recognize it is a problem is that it is so widely distributed. There are some buildings that kill thousands of birds a year."

Transparent and reflective glass both pose a threat to migratory and local birds, Sheppard says. Birds don't see glass or recognize it as a barrier and think they are flying to vegetation they see through the window or in a reflection, she says.

Marking windows with dots or other designs, or shielding the glass with screens or other architectural devices, can reduce fatal accidents, Sheppard says.

Margie O'Driscoll, executive director of the American Institute of Architects' _________ chapter, says her group supports the idea of protecting birds but believes the ordinance "doesn't seem like the best way to go about it." She says the action was taken without a study of bird deaths due to buildings in _____________. "I walk to work every day down Market Street," O'Driscoll says. "I've never seen a dead bird."

She says glass with partially opaque material inside can double the cost and create "murky" viewing, and may reduce energy efficiency.

"For people who want a great view and pay a premium for a great view, there's going to be some serious frustration," O'Driscoll says.

AnMarie Rodgers, manager of legislative affairs in the ____________ Planning Department, and Erika Lovejoy, senior environmental planner in the department, reviewed 30 years of research and local experience with birds in drafting the proposal.

Rodgers says the (hint)California Academy of Sciences building inside __________ Park, built with expansive glass panes, has been retrofitted with screens during parts of the year to deter bird accidents.

Rodgers says they did not believe the ordinance would increase building costs. It will apply to new construction in certain areas considered near bird habitats, including within 300 feet of a 2-acre or larger green space or open water.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2011-09-20-glass-birds-building-code/50484558/1

We'd be up to our knees in dead bird carcuses if this were the case and what do we do about those bird deaths resulting from feline hunting?
« Last Edit: September 25, 2011, 10:02:07 AM by warpmine »
Remember, four boxes keep us free:
The soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.

Online Pandora

  • Administrator
  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 19529
  • I iz also makin a list. U on it pal.
Re: US city OKs 'bird-safe' building standard
« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2011, 02:59:56 PM »
Yup, SanFran; knew it.

Why is it everytime a new building code is established, the lie is pushed that it won't increase costs, when they know we know they're lying.  Everything increases building costs and it is already prohibitively expensive to build in San Francisco.
"Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer." - Mark Twain

"Let us assume for the moment everything you say about me is true. That just makes your problem bigger, doesn't it?"

Offline Glock32

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 8747
  • Get some!
Re: US city OKs 'bird-safe' building standard
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2011, 03:34:06 PM »
And I am thoroughly sick of all the rent-seeking from groups like the AIA, using government coercion to force people into purchasing what they or their members just happen to be selling.
"The Fourth Estate is less honorable than the First Profession."

- Yours Truly

Offline AlanS

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 7908
  • Proud Infidel
Re: US city OKs 'bird-safe' building standard
« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2011, 05:22:29 PM »
Yup, SanFran; knew it.

Why is it everytime a new building code is established, the lie is pushed that it won't increase costs, when they know we know they're lying.  Everything increases building costs and it is already prohibitively expensive to build in San Francisco.

Which make building everywhere else more attractive. Which means they'll move and try to force their asinine views on us. ::rockets::
"Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem."

Thomas Jefferson