Topic: AlGore fabricated science: proof

[charlesoakwood]

Watts Up With That has done it again.  Not satisfied to rest on their laurels having busted the climate fraud gang at the University of East Anglia in Britain they've now got the clamps on American High Priest of Climate Fraud, Albert Gore.

Video analysis and scene replication suggests that Al Gore’s Climate Reality Project fabricated their Climate 101 video “Simple Experiment”

It is worth watching a couple of times to get fully familiar with the sequence.

I’ve been in television broadcasting for over 20 years, and I’m quite familiar with editing tricks, I think I spotted more than a few in the video.

There are five scenes that appear, each an edit in that 20 second span of video during which an experiment is set up which supposedly demonstrates that CO2 in a heated jar causes that jar to be warmer than a second heated jar with ambient air in it.

In that 20 second span, I looked for things that changed, indicating that it wasn’t done in a continuous shot. I found evidence that the scene was changed at least three times, suggesting multiple takes.

This is just a taste and it's all delicious, videos included at link.

[ToddF]

For a guy trying to step back from his website a teensy bit, he sure put some serious time into that gore-slapping. 

[IronDioPriest]

That is a great takedown, and this is indisputable:

"The only conclusion one can make from these four points is that the video of the “simple experiment” is a complete fabrication done in post production."

Having said that, the fallback position for the Gore people will obviously be that the video was just a graphic representation and instructions on how to conduct the experiment, and not the actual experiment itself.

Of course, that begs the inclusion of a disclaimer. But we all know that honesty and transparency is not on the AGW menu.

ALGOREFAIL!
 

[Libertas]

 

[Damn_Lucky]

Duh!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[charlesoakwood]

[UPDATE:

New images added prove without a doubt the faked split screen. See below.]
...
The giveaways were that I saw objects change in the scene, most notably the CO2 tank, which has three different rotation positions. See the video captures from the Climate 101 video below, with my annotations. Note the position of the safety valve (1) and the label (2) change (click images for HD resolution):
...
(UPDATE 10:27AM : spotted by commenter “mkelly” – note the thermometers are reversed in the 1:05 video capture versus the 1:09 video capture – note the ...
...
One thing that struck me was how clean the image of the two thermometers was. Remember this is an experiment where the two thermometers are placed inside two glass jars. ...

Poor Al. 
Actually, he's quite lucky the media love's him and they are very busy carrying the water for his O'ness for he is ripe for the picking.

[IronDioPriest]

Notice how quickly the media dispensed with his second chakra/infidelity/divorce scandal?

Al Gore and Tipper Gore getting a divorce because bloated Al went grunting after some tail is a pretty big story as such stories go. I mean, as the tale goes, "Love Story" was written about them, right? The media is not independent. Obviously.

[RickZ]

Notice how quickly the media dispensed with his second chakra/infidelity/divorce scandal?

Al Gore and Tipper Gore getting a divorce because bloated Al went grunting after some tail is a pretty big story as such stories go. I mean, as the tale goes, "Love Story" was written about them, right? The media is not independent. Obviously.

Get Tommy Lee Jones to play Al in the movie.  After all,  "[a]s upperclassmen at Harvard, the two close friends chose to live together as roommates. . . . [A]t the 2000 Democratic National Convention (held in Los Angeles) Tommy Lee Jones would give the speech that officially nominated and introduced his former college roommate, Al Gore. . . ."

The only sour note for me in thinking Love Story (which I actually saw in the theaters, an 'adult' movie which, as a brand new teen, was deemed worthy to watch) was about the Gores is, with the Gores, no spouse died.  Well, except for the death of the few functioning synapses Al Gore ever owned.  Considering what a lying and loud huckster Al Gore turned out to be, more's the pity.

Considering how much damage Gore has done and continues to do, he becomes one of those historical killing dilemnas.  Would you go back and kill Hitler in 1918-1919?  If not, why not?  That sort of thing.  If this glowbull warming scam as scared up by Gore and his acolytes continues to soak of the financial, technological and social assets of Western Nations to support our brown or black brothers in poor starving Asia or Africa and redistribute our welalth to the undeserving bastards, then the damage an Al Gore would do is heinous enough in its body count to place him in the 'What if?' navel gazing line of reasoning.

[warpmine]

The list for assassination via time travel is simply to long at this point. And yes, all of those changes in the timeline would be an improvement. Karl Marx would be the greatest change if he were accidentally killed prior to the writing of his manifesto. The beginnings of all things socialism, the progressive movement would be delayed or never happen.

On the other hand, Satan wold just enlist someone else to write it. Brother Mo would be the other Satan disciple but he wld make do wth another I'm sure.