Author Topic: Europe's Underestimated Islamists  (Read 689 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jpatrickham

  • A Regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 943
  • "No morn ever dawned more favorable than ours did;
Europe's Underestimated Islamists
« on: October 10, 2011, 10:31:43 AM »
Sunday, 09 October 2011 08:05 Ian Johnson   
 
Middle East Quarterly Fall 2011, pp. 39-46


  
Quote
"In early 1959, a small West German intelligence operation stumbled over a sensational find: U.S. collusion with the Muslim Brotherhood. According to the West German sources—two ex-Wehrmacht soldiers who were in Washington's pay but still felt loyalty to their old German bosses—Washington was supporting one of the Brotherhood's top men, the Geneva-based Said Ramadan, son-in-law of the movement's founder Hassan al-Banna, in the hope of using him in the global battle against communism. The U.S. double-agents wanted to know if the West Germans would also help support Ramadan.

Bonn's response was an unequivocal "no": not because of ethical qualms about doing business with the Brotherhood but because of practical considerations. "Ramadan doesn't possess the slightest influence in the Orient," read an evaluation by the head of the West German intelligence operation, Gerhard von Mende. "A connection with him would only yield negative consequences."[1]

 
In an unassuming office complex in Herndon, Virginia, the Muslim Brotherhood's European leaders set up the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) as a beachhead for spreading Islamist thought in the West. IIIT's headquarters were raided by the FBI in 2002 for connections to terrorists, and the institute was cited in 2010 by the Justice Department as an unindicted coconspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing case.
 
Von Mende was neither the first nor the last to have underestimated the Brotherhood or its leaders. In its 83-year history, the movement has time and again been written off as out of date, broken, or otherwise a non-force. Most recently, Western analysts of the Middle East upheavals were quick to portray the Brotherhood as out of touch and, basically, inept. U.S. director of national intelligence James Clapper reduced it to a "largely secular" movement[2] while anthropologist Scott Atran argued that its "failure to support the initial uprising in Cairo on Jan. 25 [2011] has made it marginal to the spirit of revolt now spreading across the Arab world."[3] News pages had similar coverage with the Brotherhood's absence in some Cairo neighborhoods seen as indicative of its declining importance.[4]

Of course, as is now known, the Brotherhood played a leading role in the Egyptian uprising and its wake.[5] This should have come as no surprise. For all its flaws, mistakes, and disastrous decisions, the Brotherhood is one of the most resilient organizations in modern history. Its longevity is due to one of its defining characteristics: an almost intuitive ability to assume new forms while pursuing its ultimate goals and carving out niches of influence. In its eagerness to write off the Brotherhood, the West has shown a distinct lack of attentiveness to the group, leading to decades of blunders.

Nowhere has this phenomenon been more starkly demonstrated than in Europe. For half-a-century—unlike in the Arab world—the Brotherhood has been able to grow without any restrictions, going from a one-man operation centered around Ramadan to being the continent's foremost Islamist force. How this happened illustrates the Islamist movement's potency and hints at ways it can be dealt with today. A decade after the 9/11 attacks, why is the West still grappling with Islamism, not so much as a force for terrorism—though that risk remains potent—but as an important political force throughout the Middle East and beyond?"

Planting the Seeds

Quote
"Gamal Abdel Nasser's 1954 ban of the Brotherhood forced the group to reorganize abroad. While many of its senior leaders would spend years in Egyptian jails and its top theoretician, Sayyid Qutb, would be executed, the group was fortunate in having two havens where it was able to regroup. One was Saudi Arabia where it laid down deep roots, eventually melding with indigenous Islamist movements to create a powerful and violent challenge to the ruling royal family.[6] The other, less well-known haven was Europe. Ramadan had already been to the continent several times and was studying law at Cologne University. When the Egyptian ban came into effect, he was living in Geneva, which he would make his home until his death forty years later."

http://www.rightsidenews.com/2011100914679/life-and-science/culture-wars/europes-underestimated-islamists.html?

« Last Edit: October 10, 2011, 10:34:51 AM by jpatrickham »

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 64020
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: Europe's Underestimated Islamists
« Reply #1 on: October 10, 2011, 11:32:57 AM »
PL much to their credit doggedly reported on the whole CAIR/HLF tangled web of Islamist intrigue and treachery.

Not much has changed since those revelations, so much ignorance here about the true evil nature and intent of Isslam!

Europe is just further along the curve, we are their main target.  And we have a prez who is complicit in ignoring the danger at home and allowing it to feed and grow overseas.

Egypt is becoming a fricken nightmare, Obama's democratization push without a clue is handing power to crazier bastards than the ones previously in power who largely were able to control the worst of the malcontents.

The world is ablaze with hate and Obama bears a big responsibility for its growing angst!
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.