Topic: "Hot" OWS chicks

[charlesoakwood]

They remind me of a Mo-ped fun to ride but you don't want to get caught on one.
 

!

[warpmine]

Yowza.  Even the last one isn't bad, except for her hair.  That doesn't bother me much, because hair is impermanent.  She can always change her hairstyle.

I'm not a fan of tattoos or piercings, but they've become so commonplace that I can mostly ignore them if the woman is really beautiful.  I read somewhere recently that they may be starting to go out of style.  Apparently youngsters aren't getting them at the same rate they were a few years ago.  And I don't mind "non-traditional" hair colors at all.  Again, hair is easily changeable.

Dave Barry once said something to the effect that you can tell which political movements are in the ascendancy by the number of attractive women who are involved.  That might be something to keep in mind.

What, you're not a fan of fishing tackle in the face? I always ask them which river or lake they got caught in. Always get a confused stare.

[Glock32]

The one with the arm tattoos and large feather in her hair wasn't too bad, but that's about it. The rest are typical granola looking leftie muffdivers.

I don't mind unnatural hair colors, it can look good on some girls when they have streaks of it mixed in. I find tattoos and piercings a pretty big turnoff though.

Ultimately it doesn't matter, because I'm so disgusted by leftism that even the reptilian core of my brain can't overlook it anymore.

[Predator Don]

Yowza.  Even the last one isn't bad, except for her hair.  That doesn't bother me much, because hair is impermanent.  She can always change her hairstyle.

I'm not a fan of tattoos or piercings, but they've become so commonplace that I can mostly ignore them if the woman is really beautiful.  I read somewhere recently that they may be starting to go out of style.  Apparently youngsters aren't getting them at the same rate they were a few years ago.  And I don't mind "non-traditional" hair colors at all.  Again, hair is easily changeable.

Dave Barry once said something to the effect that you can tell which political movements are in the ascendancy by the number of attractive women who are involved.  That might be something to keep in mind.

What, you're not a fan of fishing tackle in the face? I always ask them which river or lake they got caught in. Always get a confused stare.

 

Man, I love fishing tackle.....I have so much my garage wall looks like Walmart......but not on my women. If there's piercings in the ears, the nose, the tongue, the belly button,,,,,you know where are piercings elsewhere....

[John Florida]

A pretty face can hide a sick mind.I hope they grow the hell up and buy a clue.

[trapeze]

Yeah tattoos look interesting (I won't say "great") until the person takes on the inevitable weight, wrinkles, etc. that comes with aging. Then they really look like crap.

Yeah, I think there's a few hotties in there too Ben. I'm not bothered by a few Tatts, a nose-ring, or a little unnatural color in the hair. I don't prefer it, mind you, but I don't think it renders a pretty girl automatically un-pretty.

Just easy.....

There's a reason they call them "tramp stamps." Not saying that all women with tattoos are tramps but face it, there's a good reason why the stereotype exists.

Anyway, I look on all that stuff as a form of self mutilation.

But then, I'm old and certainly not hip. And I can live with that.

[Weisshaupt]

Anyway, I look on all that stuff as a form of self mutilation.

You know, I think that is it. That is the reason why they aren't "hotties" to me, even though they might be without the mutilation.  God granted women this near  perfect and eye pleasing form,  and these women are so arrogant that they think by adding their own touch, they can improve on God's work.  And in the end they are like Reavers, cutting on themselves.  In the end the effect isn't pretty, and you have visible evidence that these women are going to put their own wishes before God's - be it be sleeping around , or be demanding stealing become moral, etc.  Even the ugliest of women can gain two points on the beauty scale just by smiling (ever see feminists smile?)  and having a decent soul reflected in her eyes.  These women have gone so far that they are proud of their rotting insides and what to reflect it on the outside.


 

[IronDioPriest]

Anyway, I look on all that stuff as a form of self mutilation.

You know, I think that is it. That is the reason why they aren't "hotties" to me, even though they might be without the mutilation.  God granted women this near  perfect and eye pleasing form,  and these women are so arrogant that they think by adding their own touch, they can improve on God's work.  And in the end they are like Reavers, cutting on themselves.  In the end the effect isn't pretty, and you have visible evidence that these women are going to put their own wishes before God's - be it be sleeping around , or be demanding stealing become moral, etc.  Even the ugliest of women can gain two points on the beauty scale just by smiling (ever see feminists smile?)  and having a decent soul reflected in her eyes.  These women have gone so far that they are proud of their rotting insides and what to reflect it on the outside.


 

What improvement on God's perfect work does the application of makeup represent? The application of makeup is nearly a universally accepted practice, and yet it is concrete evidence that women and the men who enjoy looking at them universally believe that God's perfect work can be improved upon through appearance alteration.

I'm just sayin', if we're gonna hold a standard that says adding personal touches to ones appearance is arrogance (an argument I'm open to), then it has to be a consistent standard. Does the application of makeup  lend visible evidence that a woman will put her own wishes before God's through immoral behavior? Where is the line?

See, I think the line is "you know it when you see it". And that line is 100% subjective. One woman's foundation, eye shadow, eye liner, and lip gloss is another woman's large feather earring and arm tattoo.

[LadyVirginia]

For me if gal wants a tat I'm more or less okay with that or 5 earrings in her ear.  But the distinguishing point for me is the attitude that goes with the tatted up body and multiple piercings. Generally the attitude exhibited is defensive and angry and a cry to be "different".  Most women I know who use makeup are seeking to feel good and uplift their mood by looking better.

[benb61]

For me if gal wants a tat I'm more or less okay with that or 5 earrings in her ear.  But the distinguishing point for me is the attitude that goes with the tatted up body and multiple piercings. Generally the attitude exhibited is defensive and angry and a cry to be "different".  Most women I know who use makeup are seeking to feel good and uplift their mood by looking better.

I have to agree with you LadyVirginia, even the most beautiful woman seems ugly to me if her attitude is poor.  Most women that I have known that have multiple tats and piercings are always angry about something and that is just a turn off.  The sexiest thing I have seen in women is when they act demure and playful, angry just don't cut it.

[Pandora]

Anyway, I look on all that stuff as a form of self mutilation.

You know, I think that is it. That is the reason why they aren't "hotties" to me, even though they might be without the mutilation.  God granted women this near  perfect and eye pleasing form,  and these women are so arrogant that they think by adding their own touch, they can improve on God's work.  And in the end they are like Reavers, cutting on themselves.  In the end the effect isn't pretty, and you have visible evidence that these women are going to put their own wishes before God's - be it be sleeping around , or be demanding stealing become moral, etc.  Even the ugliest of women can gain two points on the beauty scale just by smiling (ever see feminists smile?)  and having a decent soul reflected in her eyes.  These women have gone so far that they are proud of their rotting insides and what to reflect it on the outside.


 

What improvement on God's perfect work does the application of makeup represent? The application of makeup is nearly a universally accepted practice, and yet it is concrete evidence that women and the men who enjoy looking at them universally believe that God's perfect work can be improved upon through appearance alteration.

I'm just sayin', if we're gonna hold a standard that says adding personal touches to ones appearance is arrogance (an argument I'm open to), then it has to be a consistent standard. Does the application of makeup  lend visible evidence that a woman will put her own wishes before God's through immoral behavior? Where is the line?

See, I think the line is "you know it when you see it". And that line is 100% subjective. One woman's foundation, eye shadow, eye liner, and lip gloss is another woman's large feather earring and arm tattoo.

If I may interject here, the application of make-up is to disguise flaws or imperfections -- human women are not perfectly made even when pleasing.  Tattoos are adding imperfections (which get only more imperfect in time), in my opinion, so there's the difference and YMMV.

Besides, makeup and feather earrings are temporary and easily removed; tats, not so much.

[Weisshaupt]

If I may interject here, the application of make-up is to disguise flaws or imperfections -- human women are not perfectly made even when pleasing.  Tattoos are adding imperfections (which get only more imperfect in time), in my opinion, so there's the difference and YMMV.

I'm just sayin', if we're gonna hold a standard that says adding personal touches to ones appearance is arrogance (an argument I'm open to), then it has to be a consistent standard. Does the application of makeup  lend visible evidence that a woman will put her own wishes before God's through immoral behavior? Where is the line?
See, I think the line is "you know it when you see it". And that line is 100% subjective. One woman's foundation, eye shadow, eye liner, and lip gloss is another woman's large feather earring and arm tattoo.

Actually I always found women without makeup more attractive - or maybe they had makeup on, but I didn't notice. Which is the point.
There IS  a line you cross. Pandora seems to suggest the proper place for make up is  for hiding imperfections and  subtle enhancement of natural features. There is a huge difference between that and making yourself up to look  like a cheap whore. If you look at a woman and notice her make-up first (or Tat, or nose ring, or blue hair) , I suspect she has crossed the line.

And yeah, its a stereo-type, and I may have passed on getting to know a good woman because of my prejudices in this area, but dating for me was always work, and I wasn't going to invest a lot of effort into women who, by their outward appearance,  thoughtfully informed me that there was a 99% chance that I would hate their guts ( and they would hate mine) 

[Predator Don]

Let me just add, to those of you who believe you can look past it to the inner beauty or believe the tattoo or piercings won't affect you........

I've seen the effects of age to the tattoo and piercing.....and it ain't pretty.


No one wants to see grandmas sagging.........tats.

[IronDioPriest]

I guess that it is possible that spending the majority of my life in the music subculture with hair down to my waist - and having a couple large tattoos myself - has blunted any automatic aversion to girls and women who go to different lengths to enhance their appearance.

I spent my entire adulthood until after 40 overcoming peoples stereotypes of me because of how I looked. My definition of what constitutes a freakish appearance just includes  more diversion from the norm.

[Predator Don]

I guess that it is possible that spending the majority of my life in the music subculture with hair down to my waist - and having a couple large tattoos myself - has blunted any automatic aversion to girls and women who go to different lengths to enhance their appearance.

I spent my entire adulthood until after 40 overcoming peoples stereotypes of me because of how I looked. My definition of what constitutes a freakish appearance just includes  more diversion from the norm.

I have nothing against Tattoos....But when I see them cover arms, legs, scalps, waists, feet, chests, etc....Mother nature won't be kind, that's all I'm stating. I've seen more than once where too many tattoos or too many piercings kept a candidate from a job.

[Weisshaupt]

I've seen more than once where too many tattoos or too many piercings kept a candidate from a job.

Date. Job. Same difference. People use it as a cue. But of course now there is tattoo covered Barbie. 

[Damn_Lucky]

What, you're not a fan of fishing tackle in the face? I always ask them which river or lake they got caught in. Always get a confused stare

I'm stealing that!

[rickl]

I guess that it is possible that spending the majority of my life in the music subculture with hair down to my waist - and having a couple large tattoos myself - has blunted any automatic aversion to girls and women who go to different lengths to enhance their appearance.

And I used to go to Dead shows.  I've seen it all, and then some.   

[Damn_Lucky]

I guess that it is possible that spending the majority of my life in the music subculture with hair down to my waist - and having a couple large tattoos myself - has blunted any automatic aversion to girls and women who go to different lengths to enhance their appearance.

And I used to go to Dead shows.  I've seen it all, and then some.   

Ben there done that. And Rock on.
It took the  gangs in L.A. to get me to move to the Mid-West and turns out it was the best move I ever made.
God moves in mysterious ways.

[rickl]

Various forms of body modification have been practiced by cultures all over the world.  Tattoos, piercings, and makeup probably go back to prehistoric times.  There are even more extreme examples, like neck rings and foot binding. 

So I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

These things probably died out somewhat in the West due to religious proscriptions.  I understand the Jewish tradition frowns on tattoos, and no doubt Christians inherited that aesthetic.  The Wiki foot binding page quotes a Muslim condemning the practice.  The resurgence in recent years probably reflects the falling away of some people from Western religions, increased interest in foreign religions, and multiculturalism.