The traitors need to be dealt with, and the issue, like most others, need to keep getting put up for votes as often as possible.
I don't disagree on principle Libertas, re; dealing with the RINO traitors. But as I read this, I asked myself, in places like New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Maine, and Illinois, how does the GOP do better than the people that are there? I know the argument that says we'd be better off if people who vote like Democrats would just be Democrats. But majorities are important, and on some important issues - especially since the Tea Party - there has been some ground gained by holding RINO feet to the fire. Of course, the high cost is utter disappointments like this.
Idunno. The Maine sisters are a known quantity, and we've been dealing with their betrayals for years. They've shown some signs that they are not immune to Tea Party pressure. Alexander is going to be targeted by the Tea Party for sure - Tennessee can do much better. But in the case of Ayotte, Brown, and Kirk, I don't know what the answer is. I don't know how the GOP does better than them, and I don't know that it would be worth sacrificing a potential majority in order to risk primary battles against them.