Topic: Private Property? Ha! Since when?

[BMG]

http://hotair.com/archives/2011/11/15/nypd-clears-occupy-wall-street-compound-70-arrested/

Hey, you thought that private property owners could evict squatters after two months of allowing them to vent their incoherent political frustrations?  Not in New York City, pal (via JWF):

   A New York judge on Tuesday issued a temporary restraining order allowing protesters to return to Zuccotti Park only hours after police forcibly removed them, arresting dozens.

    The order by Justice Lucy Billings set a hearing date for Tuesday at 11:30 a.m. and said that until the matter was considered at that hearing, the city and Brookfield Properties, the owners of Zuccotti Park, would be prohibited from evicting protesters or “enforcing ‘rules’ published after the occupation began or otherwise preventing protesters from re-entering the park with tents and other property previously utilized.”

    It was not immediately clear what effect the order would have on the protesters meeting in nearby Foley Square. Some had advocated returning to the park.

So, looks like private property is now the property of the government (not that we didn't already know this of course).

[Pandora]

Not so fast ....

But within hours, she was off the case as court administrators prepared to randomly choose a new judge — and excluded Billings’ name from the list of candidates.

Link

This is all so much communist crap.  This btch has followed in the steps of those who have determined your property is at the disposal of anyone who lodges a claim, so matter how spurious or bogus, that she and her ilk can use to deprive you of it.  The park is private property for the use of the public; how not allowing tents for campouts is a violation of these POS "civil rights" is turning the rule of law on its head.

SSDD.

[charlesoakwood]

I can hear her say it, all your private property is target
for your enemy, and your enemy is me.

HT/JA

[BMG]

GRRRRRRRRR 

[Libertas]

Much angst at Atlas Shrugs, as expected -

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/11/liberal-judge-lucy-billings-allows-ows-protestors-to-return-to-zucotti-park.html

Judgepedia - Smith's, Berzerkley, ACLU...

http://judgepedia.org/index.php/Lucy_Billings

World-class leftist POS!

More -

http://nycourtsystem.com/applications/jcec2009/Bio2009.php?ID=699

 

 

 

[Pandora]

Nobody gets back in the back until the new judge rules on the previous injunction.

[Pandora]

From Auster:

As I said weeks ago, this is the way it is with liberal politicians such as Michael Bloomberg. They let a bad situation continue on and on and get worse and worse, in the meantime adopting all kinds of pious liberal poses to justify their lack of action to fix the situation, and only take action when the problem becomes completely intolerable and has caused much harm that could have been readily avoided if they had acted sooner.

That's how they maintain their identity and legitimacy as liberals. If they had acted sooner, they would be seen as "oppressive right wingers." By not acting until their liberal constituents' unprincipled exceptions to their own liberalism have blossomed ("Oooh, I believe in the right of protest, I believe in fighting the greedy corporations, but I can't stand the the noise, the smell, the inconvenience any more. Help!"), they preserve their liberal credentials.

That is, they impose their Oppression in the name of liberalism until it becomes "too much", i.e. "things have gone too far", and then they throw their liberal "principles" out the window and act like they should have in the first place, like those dreaded "right-wingers".

Any thinking person can brain-storm the eventual and logical end of almost any course of action today, within reason.  But the Left doesn't think; they emote, they feeeeeel, they "intend", and they're always covertly surprised when what any rational person could have predicted comes to pass.  "Unexpected"!

[Damn_Lucky]

From Auster:

As I said weeks ago, this is the way it is with liberal politicians such as Michael Bloomberg. They let a bad situation continue on and on and get worse and worse, in the meantime adopting all kinds of pious liberal poses to justify their lack of action to fix the situation, and only take action when the problem becomes completely intolerable and has caused much harm that could have been readily avoided if they had acted sooner.

That's how they maintain their identity and legitimacy as liberals. If they had acted sooner, they would be seen as "oppressive right wingers." By not acting until their liberal constituents' unprincipled exceptions to their own liberalism have blossomed ("Oooh, I believe in the right of protest, I believe in fighting the greedy corporations, but I can't stand the the noise, the smell, the inconvenience any more. Help!"), they preserve their liberal credentials.

That is, they impose their Oppression in the name of liberalism until it becomes "too much", i.e. "things have gone too far", and then they throw their liberal "principles" out the window and act like they should have in the first place, like those dreaded "right-wingers".

Any thinking person can brain-storm the eventual and logical end of almost any course of action today, within reason.  But the Left doesn't think; they emote, they feeeeeel, they "intend", and they're always covertly surprised when what any rational person could have predicted comes to pass.  "Unexpected"!

Well said Pan they always feel for you until they feel you next to them...............Hippocrates All.