Author Topic: OWSer Violence Keeps Increasing  (Read 959 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 64020
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
OWSer Violence Keeps Increasing
« on: November 10, 2011, 02:35:56 PM »
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20111110/NEWS02/111110019/Breaking-Police-respond-shooting-City-Hall-Park?odyssey=mod|breaking|text|FRONTPAGE

http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Occupy-Wall-Street-EMT-Assaulted-Zuccotti-Park-Arrest-133613788.html

More crap to throw in the face of the MFM and the Dem's sho support this trash...show me again how this garbage is similar to Tea Party people?!  Oh, that's right YOU CAN'T!

 ::gaah::
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

charlesoakwood

  • Guest
Re: OWSer Violence Keeps Increasing
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2011, 02:50:45 PM »

It's necessary for them to perpetuate the lie.


Offline BMG

  • Established Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1320
Re: OWSer Violence Keeps Increasing
« Reply #2 on: November 10, 2011, 03:47:04 PM »
I imagine that it's going to continue to escalate up to the 2012 elections and if the socialists lose big in 2012 like is being predicted now, I imagine that it'll continue.
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government.” 
- Patrick Henry

"The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates."
- Tacitus

Offline Damn_Lucky

  • A Regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 909
    • patriotsteaparty
Re: OWSer Violence Keeps Increasing
« Reply #3 on: November 10, 2011, 04:01:54 PM »
I think between all this and the quote unquote failed EBS system sometime around next October there will be one huge economical "Crisis" and ObaMao will try to take control. ::foilhathelicopter::
A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves - Edward R. Murrow

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 64020
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: OWSer Violence Keeps Increasing
« Reply #4 on: November 10, 2011, 11:26:38 PM »
I think 2012 is going to have more surprises coming out of The Regime than people can handle...
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline michelleo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 323
Re: OWSer Violence Keeps Increasing
« Reply #5 on: November 11, 2011, 06:02:01 PM »
Is it just me, or is the term "Black Bloc" to symbolize the violent Oakland anarchist faction of the OWS Oakland a racist term?!

Occupy Oakland General Assembly Fails To Establish Consensus On Non-violence Policy
Quote
The biggest complaint was lack of clarity of the language. Proponants of the inclusion of black bloc and violent tactics were unhappy because of the constraints it attempted to place and many nonvioloence proponants were unhappy because it wouldn't effectively prohibit violence/vandalism, and the language might be interpreted as legitimizing black bloc tactics. ...Just before the main nonviolence proposal was to be presented, it was withdrawn. Apparently the decision to withdraw the proposal resulted from intensive discussion between proposers, unions, grassroots groups, etc. The reason given was that at the current juncture (i.e. an implicit reference to the impending police raid, etc.), solidarity was perceived as more important than a discussion on nonviolence.

Theatre of the absurd.

Online Pandora

  • Administrator
  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 19529
  • I iz also makin a list. U on it pal.
Re: OWSer Violence Keeps Increasing
« Reply #6 on: November 11, 2011, 07:08:00 PM »
Is it just me, or is the term "Black Bloc" to symbolize the violent Oakland anarchist faction of the OWS Oakland a racist term?!

Occupy Oakland General Assembly Fails To Establish Consensus On Non-violence Policy
Quote
The biggest complaint was lack of clarity of the language. Proponants of the inclusion of black bloc and violent tactics were unhappy because of the constraints it attempted to place and many nonvioloence proponants were unhappy because it wouldn't effectively prohibit violence/vandalism, and the language might be interpreted as legitimizing black bloc tactics. ...Just before the main nonviolence proposal was to be presented, it was withdrawn. Apparently the decision to withdraw the proposal resulted from intensive discussion between proposers, unions, grassroots groups, etc. The reason given was that at the current juncture (i.e. an implicit reference to the impending police raid, etc.), solidarity was perceived as more important than a discussion on nonviolence.

Theatre of the absurd.


Now, don't be letting the liberalism infect your thinking; long before the black bloc, there were Black Russians, Black Irish, Black Holes and black-balling.

So, the decision was to aim for "solidarity" rather than to expound and uphold some sound principles which means, as usually happens, the more leftist elements won.
"Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer." - Mark Twain

"Let us assume for the moment everything you say about me is true. That just makes your problem bigger, doesn't it?"

Offline AlanS

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 7908
  • Proud Infidel
Re: OWSer Violence Keeps Increasing
« Reply #7 on: November 11, 2011, 07:38:10 PM »
Is it just me, or is the term "Black Bloc" to symbolize the violent Oakland anarchist faction of the OWS Oakland a racist term?!

Occupy Oakland General Assembly Fails To Establish Consensus On Non-violence Policy
Quote
The biggest complaint was lack of clarity of the language. Proponants of the inclusion of black bloc and violent tactics were unhappy because of the constraints it attempted to place and many nonvioloence proponants were unhappy because it wouldn't effectively prohibit violence/vandalism, and the language might be interpreted as legitimizing black bloc tactics. ...Just before the main nonviolence proposal was to be presented, it was withdrawn. Apparently the decision to withdraw the proposal resulted from intensive discussion between proposers, unions, grassroots groups, etc. The reason given was that at the current juncture (i.e. an implicit reference to the impending police raid, etc.), solidarity was perceived as more important than a discussion on nonviolence.

Theatre of the absurd.


Now, don't be letting the liberalism infect your thinking; long before the black bloc, there were Black Russians, Black Irish, Black Holes and black-balling.

So, the decision was to aim for "solidarity" rather than to expound and uphold some sound principles which means, as usually happens, the more leftist elements won.

Leaving the rest just as clueless as when they first started.
"Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem."

Thomas Jefferson