Author Topic: Kagan's non-recusal and what it means  (Read 812 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Pandora

  • Administrator
  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 19530
  • I iz also makin a list. U on it pal.
Kagan's non-recusal and what it means
« on: November 19, 2011, 03:12:06 PM »
The two parties are not playing the same game.

Quote
They play different games, under different rules. What are these different rules? The Republicans more or less follow the laws and constitutional procedures, the Democrats deliberately and consciously break them. But the Republicans, while they complain incessantly about the Democrats, never identify this underlying fact. Why? Because that would show that the system is no longer legitimate. And the function of the Republicans, as "patriotic, conservative Americans," is to uphold the goodness and legitimacy of the system, a legitimacy which rests on the belief that everyone in American politics shares the same basic principles and loyalties. So the Republicans, as defenders of the system and its presumed basic unity, cannot expose what the Democrats are. If they exposed it, politics would be replaced by open war between two radically incompatible parties and America as we know it would come to an end.
"Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer." - Mark Twain

"Let us assume for the moment everything you say about me is true. That just makes your problem bigger, doesn't it?"

Offline Tom G.

  • Newb
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: Kagan's non-recusal and what it means
« Reply #1 on: November 19, 2011, 03:43:06 PM »
This one and abortion are the two issues where the Dems are all in.  There is nothing sacred or fair when it comes to protecting and/or getting these issues passed to the Dems liking.  Kagan was put there by Obama for this issue, so her recusing was not an option, period.

I just wish those in charge of the Repubs would recognize and deal with this in a proper way other than disappointment and resignation.


Offline BMG

  • Established Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1320
Re: Kagan's non-recusal and what it means
« Reply #2 on: November 19, 2011, 03:50:16 PM »
The really sad side to all this is that, even with all of the covering up that the republican side does in order to hide all of this what will be gained in the end? Nothing as far as I can tell. In the end the democrats will have won over more converts, the republicans will ultimately appear to be the bad guys and the civil war eluded to in the original post on this thread will still come to pass.

Whoever on the republican side that decided it was a good idea to hide all of this behind a thin veil of scruples only served to ultimately make the mess worse by orders of magnitude. If the republicans don't stop playing their games a 2nd civil war will be the end result.
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government.” 
- Patrick Henry

"The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates."
- Tacitus

Offline warpmine

  • Conservative Hero
  • ****
  • Posts: 3248
Re: Kagan's non-recusal and what it means
« Reply #3 on: November 19, 2011, 03:51:38 PM »
This one and abortion are the two issues where the Dems are all in.  There is nothing sacred or fair when it comes to protecting and/or getting these issues passed to the Dems liking.  Kagan was put there by Obama for this issue, so her recusing was not an option, period.

I just wish those in charge of the Repubs would recognize and deal with this in a proper way other than disappointment and resignation.


They recognize it alright, they just can't be bothered to do anything about it. Apparently, they believe that their job in Congress is to make as much money for themselves as possible without getting their hand caught in the cookie jar. Only thing that will change the minds of those in Congress is   ::guillotine::
Remember, four boxes keep us free:
The soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.

Online IronDioPriest

  • Administrator
  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 10830
  • I refuse to accept my civil servants as my rulers
Re: Kagan's non-recusal and what it means
« Reply #4 on: November 19, 2011, 03:52:17 PM »
I agree about the different game/different rules part. That is obvious. We help the enemy hold us to our own standards and the enemy has no standards aside from accomplishing its agenda.

I do find it a bit of a stretch though, to suppose that the reason Republicans do not identify the double standard to the egregious degree that it exists is because they calculate that full exposure of the Democrats would rob Republicans of the opportunity to play their foil by ruining the illusion of political parity.

I think the far more simple and likely answer is that human beings have a proclivity to disbelieve what is difficult or painful to contemplate. It's because many or most of them simply do not recognize the threat. They lack the courage to name their countrymen enemies of the country. Doing so brings a whole new set of possibilities into the frame of potential reality that most people are loathe to contemplate.
"A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. To lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to written law, would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property and all those who are enjoying them with us; thus absurdly sacrificing the end to the means."

- Thomas Jefferson

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 64208
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: Kagan's non-recusal and what it means
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2011, 04:40:49 PM »
Nothing will make you a war casulaty faster than self-denial...
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline AlanS

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 7908
  • Proud Infidel
Re: Kagan's non-recusal and what it means
« Reply #6 on: November 21, 2011, 10:14:21 AM »
They lack the courage to name their countrymen enemies of the country.

They lack the cajones..............period.
"Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem."

Thomas Jefferson