Beck doesn't always get it right.
However, if the vids were edited to give a different result than actually happened, I'll agree with him.
From what I've gathered the editing of the video did not change the essential facts that were exposed. Even the parsing by "theblaze" does not suggest that Schiller didn't say what he said - only that contextual things were deceptively edited to enhance the negative impression of what was already negative anyway without the deception. That is a fine line, I realize. I only make the point to say that I don't think O'Keefe's editing gives a different result than what actually happened. I think his editing attempts to guarantee that the negative perception of NPR's malfeasance would be more easily recognized.
Think about how egregiously Michael Moore distorts the facts in his films, and how eagerly the Left consumes his bullspit as truth. What O'Keefe does is not even remotely close to that level of deceptive editing. I just don't believe that what O'Keefe has done can legitimately be called a lie, especially when one holds his work up to the Leftist propaganda machine.
The point is that NPR and PBS should not be receiving fed funds.
Regardless of whether they have a Communist slant or are Birchers.
That is absolutely the most principled principled position. Would that such a case could be made to the public without the need to resort to "takedowns" and humiliation.
