Topic: If you want to have some fun bashin libs go here...

[fingerroll]

liberalforum.org


Lots of nuts there but very entertaining!

[Libertas]

We should all go in there and sign up as a libiot and see how far over the cliff we can send them!  

[LadyVirginia]

I'll do it.

Booked up today but when I have some time to waste I will join and post. 

[EW1(SG)]

Hey, I got a got great rubber mallet on sale at Home Depot!

Instead of poking brain dead libs we could just sit around and whack each other over the head with my mallet!

That sounds just as fun if not funner to me!

 

[benb61]

I went there just to check it out and the first thread I read was "obama or Hitler"

http://liberalforum.org/liberalforum/index.php?/topic/124053-hitler-or-obama/

You have to read this thread.  Currently only about 12 posts but you have to see it for yourself.

[Weisshaupt]

I went there just to check it out and the first thread I read was "obama or Hitler"

http://liberalforum.org/liberalforum/index.php?/topic/124053-hitler-or-obama/

You have to read this thread.  Currently only about 12 posts but you have to see it for yourself.

Given that there are no real policy differences between the Nazi Party and the Democratic Party.,I don't understand the question.

[Libertas]

I went there just to check it out and the first thread I read was "obama or Hitler"

http://liberalforum.org/liberalforum/index.php?/topic/124053-hitler-or-obama/

You have to read this thread.  Currently only about 12 posts but you have to see it for yourself.

Given that there are no real policy differences between the Nazi Party and the Democratic Party.,I don't understand the question.

Heh, ya beat me to it Weisshaupt!   

[benb61]

The point was that when I first read the thread Hitler was winning 3-0, and the first poster was claiming to be Jewish.

[Weisshaupt]

The point was that when I first read the thread Hitler was winning 3-0, and the first poster was claiming to be Jewish.

Well you have to look at it from the liberals point of view. Hitler was WAY more accomplishments under his belt and is way better at implementing  at Liberal Fascism.  Hitler had his business cronies, while still  stirring up the masses with a socialist message, killed all of those nasty Jews, almost conquered Europe and almost exterminated all elements of individual freedom and established a state where the common good came foremost.  However, despite doing his best, Obama has yet to really hold a candle to that sort of achievement. Its not that Obama doesn't want to punish the rich, have his cronies, and kill all those who believe in freedom, he just doesn't seem to have what Hitler had.  But Hitler took 20 years to come to power-- and  Obama just hasn't had a chance yet, alright?

But I admit, that means you just have to vote for Obama, because even though both Men have similar goals: to  implement a fascist totalitarian regime, kill jews, punish the rich ( that don't serve them) , demagogue the libtard left, and in general being about a new paradime devoid of personal freedom, Obama so so F'ing incompetent he is less likely to succeed.

[EW1(SG)]

The point was that when I first read the thread Hitler was winning 3-0, and the first poster was claiming to be Jewish.

Well you have to look at it from the liberals point of view. Hitler was WAY more accomplishments under his belt and is way better at implementing  at Liberal Fascism.  Hitler had his business cronies, while still  stirring up the masses with a socialist message, killed all of those nasty Jews, almost conquered Europe and almost exterminated all elements of individual freedom and established a state where the common good came foremost.  However, despite doing his best, Obama has yet to really hold a candle to that sort of achievement. Its not that Obama doesn't want to punish the rich, have his cronies, and kill all those who believe in freedom, he just doesn't seem to have what Hitler had.  But Hitler took 20 years to come to power-- and  Obama just hasn't had a chance yet, alright?

But I admit, that means you just have to vote for Obama, because even though both Men have similar goals: to  implement a fascist totalitarian regime, kill jews, punish the rich ( that don't serve them) , demagogue the libtard left, and in general being about a new paradime devoid of personal freedom, Obama so so F'ing incompetent he is less likely to succeed.

Besides, Hitler was a non-smoking vegetarian, and Obama is a dog-eating smoker who obviously deserves a lower rank in the liberal pantheon!

/If I were a multiculturist lefty, I would point out that there isn't anything wrong with eating dog because it's a socially accepted practice someplace, but I ain't so I'm jes' gonna throw out one o' them Neanderthal like value judgments because I find it repugnant.

[trapeze]

That is an odd site.

I perused a couple of other threads and there seemed to be as many non-libs (conservatives?) as libs. Maybe more. What was really odd was that someone who was labeled as a moderator was a conservative. Or at least gave a very strong impression of being one.

I have to wonder if that place was set up by conservatives to bash libs. It would be interesting to hear the history on the site.

I couldn't stand being there, though, for the same reason that I won't permit a lib troll to hang out here. It's just too intellectually bankrupt having them around.

[LadyVirginia]

I had the same impression, Trap.  I read as many conservative comments as not.  It shows they have 14,000 members but when I popped by there were around 100 users on line.

[warpmine]

That is an odd site.

I perused a couple of other threads and there seemed to be as many non-libs (conservatives?) as libs. Maybe more. What was really odd was that someone who was labeled as a moderator was a conservative. Or at least gave a very strong impression of being one.

I have to wonder if that place was set up by conservatives to bash libs. It would be interesting to hear the history on the site.

I couldn't stand being there, though, for the same reason that I won't permit a lib troll to hang out here. It's just too intellectually bankrupt having them around.

I to got that same impression Trap. Oh and that one dude mentioned stated he had some Jewish blood which means squat if you don't embrace it. One idiot couldn't get past the sheer fact that Zero hates America despite all the proof of friends, marriage and parents. Definitely needed a 16t weight to fall on him. Rolls eyes.

[trapeze]

I had the same impression, Trap.  I read as many conservative comments as not.  It shows they have 14,000 members but when I popped by there were around 100 users on line.

Those are actually pretty decent numbers and it is my short term goal for our forum...to have somewhere close to a hundred daily users.

Hint: Invite your friends to join here.

[LadyVirginia]

I had the same impression, Trap.  I read as many conservative comments as not.  It shows they have 14,000 members but when I popped by there were around 100 users on line.

Those are actually pretty decent numbers and it is my short term goal for our forum...to have somewhere close to a hundred daily users.

Hint: Invite your friends to join here.

I guess I was surprised they had 14,000 members but only had 100 users.  I would have thought it would be more participation with that many members. Maybe many just lurk.  But then I don't know the norm for participants vs members for forums either.

I wonder if many users encourages or discourages people to join in?

[BMG]

I wonder if many users encourages or discourages people to join in?

Maybe they don't purge their roles of inactive 'members' in order to inflate the perceived activity?

[Pandora]

I wonder if many users encourages or discourages people to join in?

Maybe they don't purge their roles of inactive 'members' in order to inflate the perceived activity?

Bingo.