More of the "good for the economy" nonsense. It's like filling a bucket in the deep end of the pool and pouring it into the shallow end, claiming to have provided a stimulus of water to the shallow part of the pool. Except you spill half of the bucket during the trip, part of the cost of transport.
There's also something telling in their use of the word "client". They probably think it is less stigmatic and demeaning to refer to welfare recipients as "clients", but it also reveals their mindset. They want the entire population to be reduced to the status of clients of the state.