Author Topic: Backdoor amnesty fades in importance as frontdoor amnesty ascends  (Read 30131 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 63663
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: Backdoor amnesty fades in importance as frontdoor amnesty ascends
« Reply #20 on: April 17, 2013, 09:15:54 PM »
DC makes Sodom look virtuous.
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Online Pandora

  • Administrator
  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 19529
  • I iz also makin a list. U on it pal.
"Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer." - Mark Twain

"Let us assume for the moment everything you say about me is true. That just makes your problem bigger, doesn't it?"

Online Pandora

  • Administrator
  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 19529
  • I iz also makin a list. U on it pal.
"Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer." - Mark Twain

"Let us assume for the moment everything you say about me is true. That just makes your problem bigger, doesn't it?"

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 63663
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: Backdoor amnesty fades in importance as frontdoor amnesty ascends
« Reply #23 on: April 19, 2013, 08:42:54 AM »
He's a politician, if his lips are moving...

And worse he is a politician with delusions of higher office!
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

charlesoakwood

  • Guest
Re: Backdoor amnesty fades in importance as frontdoor amnesty ascends
« Reply #24 on: April 19, 2013, 11:29:40 AM »

He was on Rush yesterday, didn't receive aid or comfort.
Don't expect him to make appeals from that venue again.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 63663
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: Backdoor amnesty fades in importance as frontdoor amnesty ascends
« Reply #25 on: April 19, 2013, 11:41:05 AM »
No matter.  He'll come in for another smacking once he learns the Regime will let more good Chechens in just to prove we are not an Anti-Chechen/Anti-Muzzie nation and this cuts into the Cuban quota.
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

charlesoakwood

  • Guest
Re: Backdoor amnesty fades in importance as frontdoor amnesty ascends
« Reply #26 on: April 19, 2013, 12:52:51 PM »
 ::speechless::       
                                   ::outrage::

                                                                    ::crusader::

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 63663
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: Backdoor amnesty fades in importance as frontdoor amnesty ascends
« Reply #27 on: April 22, 2013, 07:53:13 AM »
Fresh off his gun control defeat...O'Bongo will strong-arm his amnesty for all and open recruitment of jihadis bill like a demon possessed!

http://washingtonexaminer.com/obama-campaign-plans-major-push-for-gang-of-eight-immigration-bill/article/2527783
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline ChrstnHsbndFthr

  • Established Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1003
    • Affordable Bail Bonds of NC, LLC
Re: Backdoor amnesty fades in importance as frontdoor amnesty ascends
« Reply #28 on: April 22, 2013, 03:24:29 PM »
http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/22/paul-urges-reid-mcconnell-to-stall-immigration-reform-after-boston/

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul said Monday that immigration reform should not go forward until the national security weaknesses exposed by the Boston Marathon bombing are addressed.

In a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, the Republican Senator urged that the bombing — and the fact that the two alleged bombers were immigrants to the United States — be taken into account as the Senate begins the process of considering the Gang of Eight immigration reform bill.

“As our thoughts and prayers continue to go out to those affected by the tragedy in Boston, I urge you to incorporate the following national security concerns into the comprehensive immigration reform debate,” Paul wrote. “Before Congress moves forward, some important national security questions must be addressed.”


Paul continues:

I believe that any real comprehensive immigration reform must implement strong national security protections. The facts emerging in the Boston Marathon bombing have exposed a weakness in our current system. If we don’t use this debate as an opportunity to fix flaws in our current system, flaws made even more evident last week, then we will not be doing our jobs.
We should not proceed until we understand the specific failures of our immigration system. Why did the current system allow two individuals to immigrate to the United States from the Chechen Republic in Russia, an area known as a hotbed of Islamic extremism, who then committed acts of terrorism? Were there any safeguards? Could this have been prevented? Does the immigration reform before us address this?
There should be hearings in the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee that study the national security aspects of this situation, making sure that our current immigration system gives individuals from high-risk areas of the world heightened scrutiny.
In the wake of 9/11, there was a comprehensive reform of our intelligence gathering system, yet our improved intelligence gathering system did not adequately detect these extremists. We need to understand possible intelligence failures and craft solutions.
Media reports indicate that the deceased bombing suspect was interviewed by the FBI two years ago at the request of a foreign government. We need to know the details of this interview. We need to know if this interview might have given investigators any reason to conclude that this individual might be dangerous or at least worthy of further inquiry. If so, was there an intelligence failure? At the very least, it should be examined.
Media reports indicate that both the bombing suspects were legal permanent residents and one is reported to be a naturalized citizen. We need to make sure that we have safeguards against this type of situation happening again.
In 2002, Congress set up the National Security Registration System (NSEERS), yet it was suspended in 2011 by Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano. That system had problems, yet was still based on the practical idea that extra screening is necessary from nations that have a higher population of extremists. Congress might need a similar system updated for current circumstances to be rolled into comprehensive immigration reform.
I would like the US-VISIT/OBIM program studied to see if it actually works, or at least study the process by which we collect and analyze biometric data on immigrants.
Our refugee programs have proven to be a problem. On, January 29, 2013, two Iraqi citizens living in Bowling Green, in my home state of Kentucky, were sentenced to long prison terms for participating in terrorism and providing material support to terrorists while living in the United States. How did this happen? Does the current immigration reform address how this might have happened? We may need more scrutiny when accepting refugees from high-risk nations.
I want to make sure that any new bill addresses the visa entry and exit programs, in addition to refugee programs that have proven problematic in Bowling Green and possibly, if media reports are correct, in Boston.
Finally, do we need to take a hard look at student visas? Should we suspend student visas, or at least those from high-risk areas, pending an investigation into the national security implications of this program?
I respectfully request that the Senate consider the following two conditions as part of the comprehensive immigration reform debate: One, the Senate needs a thorough examination of the facts in Massachusetts to see if legislation is necessary to prevent a similar situation in the future. Two, national security protections must be rolled into comprehensive immigration reform to make sure the federal government does everything it can to prevent immigrants with malicious intent from using our immigration system to gain entry into the United States in order to commit future acts of terror.
The Gang of Eight bill was authored by Republican Sens. John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Marco Rubio and Jeff Flake, and Democratic Sens. Chuck Schumer, Dick Durbin, Michael Bennett and Bob Menendez.



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/22/paul-urges-reid-mcconnell-to-stall-immigration-reform-after-boston/#ixzz2RE3inrG2
“My mission today is to go forth and tell people about why I follow Christ and also what the Bible teaches, and part of that teaching is that women and men are meant to be together.

“However, I would never treat anyone with disrespect just because they are different from me. We are all created by the Almighty and like Him, I love all of humanity. We would all be better off if we loved God and loved each other.”
Phil Robertson an elder in the church of Christ

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 63663
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: Backdoor amnesty fades in importance as frontdoor amnesty ascends
« Reply #29 on: April 22, 2013, 05:50:43 PM »
Paul's letter is all well and good, but it falls short of derailment of any so-called comprehensive bill, and the Senate will not disobey O'Bongo on this, the House will kill it and Obama will have the purely politically engineered campaign issue he was denied on the gun control vote.

The last thing the Democrat-controlled Senate wants is a debate on the glaring problems the Boston Massacre highlighted and the Gaggle of Gimpyheaded Eight-balls is right fricken there with 'em!
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 63663
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: Backdoor amnesty fades in importance as frontdoor amnesty ascends
« Reply #30 on: April 23, 2013, 06:24:54 AM »
So  ::cussing:: typical...

Leahy is a punk-ass coward and a half-wit...the people of Vermont obviously get a shytload of lead in their drinking water...and Schumer has been a cocksucking bully since day one!  Man would I like to slap the shyt out of that thug and duel it out on the steps of the capitol!  Damn, that tradition should have never eneded!

The Left accuses the Pubbies of doing what the Left does CONSTANTLTY and the robots in the MFM dutifully record it as such and spoon feed it to the mindless sheeple!

This dynamic is so old...

“I never said that! I never said that!” Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, interjected as Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., suggested that some were using the Boston bombings as “an excuse” to slow down or stop the bill.

“I don’t mean you, Mr. Grassley,” Schumer replied, saying he wasn’t talking about anyone specifically, who said last week that the bombings raised question about gaps in the U.S. immigration system that should be examined in context of the new bill.

Grassley bridled at Leahy’s comments, saying that when Leahy proposed gun legislation, “I didn’t accuse you of using the Newtown killings as an excuse.”

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/22/sparks-fly-at-tense-senate-immigration-hearing-i-never-said-that/


That, is why Pubbies lose!

 ::cussing:: pussies!  They have long forgotten how to deal with bullies.

 ::mooning::
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 63663
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: Backdoor amnesty fades in importance as frontdoor amnesty ascends
« Reply #31 on: April 23, 2013, 11:35:36 AM »
The "Duh, no shyt Sherlock" headline of the day goes to (drum roll) - Politico!   ::rimshot::

Immigration reform could be bonanza for Democrats


Pssst!  Don't tell Rubio or the other bang-of-eighters! 

 ::unknowncomic::
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 63663
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: Backdoor amnesty fades in importance as frontdoor amnesty ascends
« Reply #32 on: April 25, 2013, 07:16:24 AM »
Lesson for others who think being eaten last by the crockodile is such a swell deal...

http://freebeacon.com/opposing-amnesty/

...nah, morons learning lessons?  Yeah, right! 

 ::mooning::
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Online benb61

  • Established Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1441
  • My 2 fast cars
Re: Backdoor amnesty fades in importance as frontdoor amnesty ascends
« Reply #33 on: April 25, 2013, 11:57:20 AM »
Nah... it's just the nigahs don't want the beaners to get reinforcements in the inner city war.  

Do I sound racist??  I'm really not, I hate all useless liberals the same, regardless of race, creed, color or national origin.
Eschew Obfuscation

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 63663
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: Backdoor amnesty fades in importance as frontdoor amnesty ascends
« Reply #34 on: April 25, 2013, 12:02:29 PM »
Avoid the crossfire...otherwise let 'em have at it...damn, was that raaaaacist?  Oh well...I'm expected to be racist and ignorant...
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 63663
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: Backdoor amnesty fades in importance as frontdoor amnesty ascends
« Reply #35 on: April 30, 2013, 11:30:51 AM »
Overwhelm the system, really, I'm supposed to fear that?  I think WTF, go for it, I ain't gettin' any younger here, if the SHTF let be while I am not yet in diapers or a wheel chair!

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/04/29/Exclusive-Immigration-bill-would-load-immediate-fiscal-burden-onto-state-local-governments-by-allowing-illegal-immigrants-onto-welfare

Oh, and somebody tell this asswipe in the photo there are no deportations under Obama, but I doubt the dumbass is capable of understanding anything!   ::mooning:: 
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

charlesoakwood

  • Guest
Re: Backdoor amnesty fades in importance as frontdoor amnesty ascends
« Reply #36 on: April 30, 2013, 12:17:40 PM »

Rubio, Rubio, where art thou Rubio?

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 63663
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: Backdoor amnesty fades in importance as frontdoor amnesty ascends
« Reply #37 on: April 30, 2013, 12:23:22 PM »
He's looking for Rapunzel, gonna use all that hair to braid a rope for people to climb to citizenship...he'll be a hero.

(Or is it he'll be a goat?)
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Online Pandora

  • Administrator
  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 19529
  • I iz also makin a list. U on it pal.
Re: Backdoor amnesty fades in importance as frontdoor amnesty ascends
« Reply #38 on: April 30, 2013, 12:24:29 PM »
He'll be a one-term senator ......
"Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer." - Mark Twain

"Let us assume for the moment everything you say about me is true. That just makes your problem bigger, doesn't it?"

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 63663
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: Backdoor amnesty fades in importance as frontdoor amnesty ascends
« Reply #39 on: April 30, 2013, 08:15:03 PM »
He'll be a one-term senator ......

 ::smallestviolin::
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.