Author Topic: The magazine ban  (Read 1121 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AlanS

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 7908
  • Proud Infidel
The magazine ban
« on: March 01, 2013, 04:10:52 PM »
Neat video that shows just how stupid libs are with their "you'll have more time to rush them" argument. And that it's done by a lawman makes it even better. ::thumbsup::

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2Upjn5DR0o&feature=player_detailpage
"Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem."

Thomas Jefferson

Offline warpmine

  • Conservative Hero
  • ****
  • Posts: 3248
Re: The magazine ban
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2013, 07:50:05 PM »
But....... ::unknowncomic::

Can we do the same test with projectiles being thrown at the shooter? Just curious.
Remember, four boxes keep us free:
The soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 63876
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: The magazine ban
« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2013, 10:06:12 AM »
Damn Adobe crash, can't see it.  Perhaps that is best for my stomach.
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Online benb61

  • Established Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1444
  • My 2 fast cars
Re: The magazine ban
« Reply #3 on: March 05, 2013, 07:09:45 PM »
Don't understand why Jim could not empty a single 30 round mag faster than he can empty two 15 round mags with a reload.  His second mag of the 15 rounds was fired really quickly.  If he had fired the first 30 round mag with the speed of the second 15 round mag he would have been less than 15 seconds.

Also, what was the hit/miss ratio?
Eschew Obfuscation

Offline Glock32

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 8747
  • Get some!
Re: The magazine ban
« Reply #4 on: March 05, 2013, 07:15:41 PM »
Yeah I was mystified by that also.
"The Fourth Estate is less honorable than the First Profession."

- Yours Truly