Author Topic: The Five Laws of Decline  (Read 1217 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Pablo de Fleurs

  • Conservative Hero
  • ****
  • Posts: 3287
  • @PesoNeto3
    • Apologetics Workshop
The Five Laws of Decline
« on: October 03, 2013, 11:09:06 PM »
I follow several leadership blogs that delve into societal/governmental impact upon the culture & which revolve around the Five Laws of Decline. I'll start a thread here for anyone wanting to read it & then add to it via replies rather than a new topic per post.

The Five Laws of Decline
(and how they apply to the fall of Rome)

1. Sturgeon’s Law: 90% of Anything is Crud
90% of the Roman politicians & senators were crud. Most weren’t leaders and looked only for ease and comfort. Others looked for illicit gains made possible by the powerful Roman army.

2. Bastiat’s Law: Humanity's desire to satisfy their wants by doing the least amount of work possible (property vs. plunder)
When Rome defeated Carthage, Rome’s first satellite territory produced grain & income for the Romans. For the 1st time Bastiat’s Law clouded the minds of the hardworking Romans, who began to enjoy money & food without effort. The Romans, as all people, liked the idea, and thy initiated wider wars to bring more cities & kingdoms into the Roman fold.

3. Gresham’s Law: When bad behavior is rewarded, more of the bad behavior will be done & will in turn drive out the good behaviors.
This drove out the nobler characters in politics, because they would not play the power games needed to thrive in the newly corrupt Rome. Leadership of Rome was no longer based on duty & honor, but instead upon desire to control the means of force to plunder outlying possessions. This brought more Machiavellian characters into Rome, and with the death of both Cato the Younger and Cicero, Gresham’s law was fully realized.

4. The Law of Diminishing Returns: The point @ which increased quantity produces lessoned quality.
This law kicked in when, through continuous expansion, Rome grew from a city to an empire extending across much of Eurasia & Northern Africa. Neither the Senate, nor later, the Caesars were capable of leading such a vast area of varying cultures or nations. With the plunder from numerous lands entering Rome, the local citizens were bought off with bread & circuses, bringing the decline of the Roman citizens as well as their government.

5. The Law of Inertia: An object @ rest tends to stay @ rest, and an object in motion tends to stay in motion.
Conditions were so bad at the end of the empire that the people hardly resisted as the barbarian hordes overran their city. Rome was exhausted under its own weight of decline at work. In truth, many of the citizens no longer felt the Roman way was worth saving, with taxes, regulations and plunder at unsustainable heights.


Rome fell, in other words, because it first opened the door to the Five Laws of Decline by governing territories. Furthermore, instead of closing the door, it swung the door wide open until it drove out the older Roman virtues and replaced them with greed for money & power.




2 Timothy 1:7
For God did not give us a spirit of timidity, but of power & of love and of calm, a well-balanced mind, discipline and self-control.

Online Pablo de Fleurs

  • Conservative Hero
  • ****
  • Posts: 3287
  • @PesoNeto3
    • Apologetics Workshop
Re: The Five Laws of Decline
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2013, 05:52:39 AM »
How to Win as Only a Free Farmer Can
Social Leader Weekly Newsletter | October 2, 2013


“Only the farmers have won,” the village elder remarks as he bids farewell to the hired gunmen.

“They remain forever. They are like the land itself… You are like the wind — blowing over the land and passing on.”

Farmer & the three surviving gunmen in the final scene of the western classic The Magnificent Seven ride off into the sunset.

They turn to gaze at the village they’ve just helped to defend — at great personal loss — against marauding bandits.

The final words of the movie, pregnant with metaphoric meaning, are uttered by the main character, hired gun Chris Adams:

“The old man was right. Only the farmers won. We lost. We always lose.”

Thirty-three years before The Magnificent Seven was released, American architect and social critic Ralph Adams Cram said it more plainly:

“Today here in the United States there is a class of men and women, perhaps the majority, that is unfree.

“I mean all those who subsist on a wage…that is paid to them by those who are, in actuality, their masters; a wage that may be withdrawn at any time and for any reason, leaving them to go on the dole, or to starve, if they can find no new job…

“These are not free men in any rational and exact sense of the word.”

So what constitutes being “free”? Cram answers:

“…he only is a free man who owns and administers his own land, craft, trade, art or profession and is able, at necessity, to maintain himself and his family himself and his family therefrom.”

 

 

The Distributist League Manifesto, as mentioned in the mind-expanding book Beyond Capitalism and Socialism, adds:

“The independent farmer is secure. He cannot be sacked. He cannot be evicted. He cannot be bullied by landlord or employer. What he produces is his own: the means of production are his own.

“Similarly the independent craftsman is secure, and the independent shopkeeper.

“No agreements, no laws, no mechanism of commerce, trade, or State, can give the security which ownership affords.

“A nation of peasants and craftsmen whose wealth is their tools and skill and materials can laugh at employers, money merchants, and politicians. It is a nation free and fearless.

“The wage-earner, however sound and skillful his work, is at the mercy of the usurers who own that by which he lives…”

Beyond economics, there are much deeper reasons why owners always win.

Ownership is far more than having material possessions. It is a mindset, a worldview, a way of life, which can be cultivated whether you’re a farmer, an entrepreneur, or an employee.

First and foremost, owners own their lives and their choices. They take ultimate responsibility for their results. No whining, no blaming, no justifying or excusing.

When staring up from the bottom of the pit of failure, resolute owners declare, “I own this. And I will fix this and succeed if it kills me.”

The owner has something worth fighting and dying for. He is deeply, soulfully married to his work. His purpose is clear, his commitment firm. The fruits of his labors taste sweeter than any wage-earner can imagine. Beware the man who dares deprive him of them.

Time clocks are utterly foreign, incomprehensible devices to the owner. He toils day and night, grinds through holidays, sweats over weekends to manifest his vision as reality. When he’s not performing his work, he’s dreaming and scheming about it.

The owner is an artist, never content with a final product, ever yearning for perfection.

The owner does not cut corners. He does it right the first time, every time — no matter who else will know. He strives for excellence not to receive praise, but because he couldn’t live with himself otherwise.

The owner sacrifices immediate gratification for long-term freedom. He lives in a car and chokes down rice and beans to save money while his friends call him crazy.

The owner thinks generationally. He connects his daily choices with the impact they will have on his children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren and beyond.

Yes, the old man was right: You can be a hired hand who blows through life like the wind, running from your true purpose, never sinking roots. Or you can be an owner whose roots and fruits remain forever…
2 Timothy 1:7
For God did not give us a spirit of timidity, but of power & of love and of calm, a well-balanced mind, discipline and self-control.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 63663
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: The Five Laws of Decline
« Reply #2 on: October 04, 2013, 06:55:47 AM »
But of course Progressives are so much more intelligent than the Roman's...it'll be bread & circus for eternity, nothing to worry about!

/
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.