Topic: Yes, Obama is a terrorist

[oldcoastie6468]

YES OBAMA IS A TERRORIST!

[IronDioPriest]

What if all the things we think we know about Barack Hussein Obama and our government are only the tip of the iceberg?

Some days, I want to find a corner of the earth, and never see another unknown human being for the rest of my days.

Come, Lord Jesus. At least then we'll know.

[Pablo de Fleurs]

 

Ha! I remember when I started blogging & bulletin-boarding that attribute 5-6 years ago...the crap I took from conservatives (not of this community). I used (coined, I think) the term "Soft, domestic U.S. terrorist" - "soft" because the terrorism was wrought via legislation & executive order instead of physical explosives & bombs.

Cousin to Muhammed Atta...but more lethal because by the time you see the results, the roots are firmly planted.

That's why I think the thoughts I think; political fantasies & thoughts with which the Secret Service takes issue.

[IronDioPriest]

Ha! I remember when I started blogging & bulletin-boarding that attribute 5-6 years ago...the crap I took from conservatives (not of this community). I used (coined, I think) the term "Soft, domestic U.S. terrorist" - "soft" because the terrorism was wrought via legislation & executive order instead of physical explosives & bombs.

Cousin to Muhammed Atta...but more lethal because by the time you see the results, the roots are firmly planted.

That's why I think the thoughts I think; political fantasies & thoughts with which the Secret Service takes issue.

It was a major point of contention with the effete Republicans at Nano's place from whence we sprang. They thought it gauche to suggest that our Islamo-centric President was a terrorist, even in an analogous or metaphoric sense.

We have people like that to thank for eventually gathering elsewhere.

[Glock32]

Ha! I remember when I started blogging & bulletin-boarding that attribute 5-6 years ago...the crap I took from conservatives (not of this community). I used (coined, I think) the term "Soft, domestic U.S. terrorist" - "soft" because the terrorism was wrought via legislation & executive order instead of physical explosives & bombs.

Cousin to Muhammed Atta...but more lethal because by the time you see the results, the roots are firmly planted.

That's why I think the thoughts I think; political fantasies & thoughts with which the Secret Service takes issue.

It was a major point of contention with the effete Republicans at Nano's place from whence we sprang. They thought it gauche to suggest that our Islamo-centric President was a terrorist, even in an analogous or metaphoric sense.

We have people like that to thank for eventually gathering elsewhere.

I ended up here after those times, but doesn't that migration seem like a microcosm of what is going on across the whole conservative political sphere? Basically telling the spineless establishmentarians who think this is all just the same old political back-and-forth to FOAD. Just as people leave forums that insist on some phony genteel collegiality, going off to form their own groups, so too they're leaving the Republican Party -- certainly in deed and spirit if not in name.

[Libertas]

Ha! I remember when I started blogging & bulletin-boarding that attribute 5-6 years ago...the crap I took from conservatives (not of this community). I used (coined, I think) the term "Soft, domestic U.S. terrorist" - "soft" because the terrorism was wrought via legislation & executive order instead of physical explosives & bombs.

Cousin to Muhammed Atta...but more lethal because by the time you see the results, the roots are firmly planted.

That's why I think the thoughts I think; political fantasies & thoughts with which the Secret Service takes issue.

It was a major point of contention with the effete Republicans at Nano's place from whence we sprang. They thought it gauche to suggest that our Islamo-centric President was a terrorist, even in an analogous or metaphoric sense.

We have people like that to thank for eventually gathering elsewhere.

I ended up here after those times, but doesn't that migration seem like a microcosm of what is going on across the whole conservative political sphere? Basically telling the spineless establishmentarians who think this is all just the same old political back-and-forth to FOAD. Just as people leave forums that insist on some phony genteel collegiality, going off to form their own groups, so too they're leaving the Republican Party -- certainly in deed and spirit if not in name.

Part of that seems natural given the state of things...other times I cannot help but wonder if we're being purposely segregated to make the Left's "Final Solution" easier to effect?  But for the latter the physical separation needs to occur, if they start letting sections secede perhaps that would be an indicator, or perhaps they are just counting on more flight from urban zoos...