It certainly is useful to theoretical discussion of same, that this topic has been officially brought up & placed upon the Congressional record. One can address & expand upon this record item rather than the [utterly beastly] act of Constitutional insurrection itself.
For example one might query as to whether or not the demise of one presumed to be acting in a manner readily identified to be on par with those actions in which a tyrant or a dictator-oriented/narcissist personality would engage during the work-a-day course of such insurrection to be considered
"assassination" or merely collateral damage incurred during the normal course of totalitarian overthrow?
Additionally, it brings to bear the question of, again within the theoretical confines of the act(s) of such an unfortunate measure of last resort, exactly how many any enumerated listing of metallurgical projectiles provided would in fact be determined sufficient in the hasty & efficient dispatch of one deemed to be such a tyrant (vs. the repeated overzealous pumping of said projectiles into the body, well after it had assumed room temperature, merely for the sake of sating years of pent up frustrations by noble patriots intent on assuring the general population that
“the bastard was truly dead” and the sanctity of our dear Republic once again secured).
Other questions may arise & even abound once any such local, community, state-wide or even national dialogue spills into the arena of public discourse…
…but those were the 1st 2 that, verily, entered into personal cognitive presupposition based upon the gentleman in the video’s conjecture as to the validity of response within a citizenry so faced and/or tasked with such a horrific & unseemly Constitutional dilemma.
Or, as the goodly gentleman generally held to be in conversational good standing with the entirety of this online community has previously stated...
....What he said times ten