This is a very big deal, and threatens Internet freedom. The Daily Stormer was ejected from their domain name registrar and had to seek alternative domain names, all of which were also subsequently ejected by their registrars.
Forget for a moment who the Daily Stormer is and note that this is a situation where a handful of domain name registrars have decided, on their own prerogatives, who is allowed to have a website and who is not. How is this tolerable on an Internet that was built to be a public information superhighway?
I read some people tweeting about this, and they pointed out that one of the registration services who rejected the Daily Stormer, TUCOWS, has no problem at all providing the domain name for NAMBLA, the infamous group advocating for legalized pedophilia.
This is also troubling on another level, and that is governments bypassing restrictions on their own authority by having "private" entities do it instead. I've never seen Leftists become such ardent advocates for private property rights, but apparently when it comes to domain registrars banning individual sites the Left is in newfound love with the idea that the 1st Amendment doesn't apply to private companies.
The ability to host a website and participate in social media is now just as fundamental to every day commerce as having telephone and electrical service were, yet the former remain fully private while the latter were quickly declared public utilities.