If this is a fake, they had to have known it would be recognized as such immediately. Which means Obama is basically telling the American people who have questions about his legitimacy to f**k off. Which would be completely in character.
If this is a fake, they had to have known it would be recognized as such immediately. Which means Obama is basically telling the American people who have questions about his legitimacy to f**k off. Which would be completely in character.
Yes. ::pokeineye::
If this is a fake, they had to have known it would be recognized as such immediately. Which means Obama is basically telling the American people who have questions about his legitimacy to f**k off. Which would be completely in character.
If this is a fake, they had to have known it would be recognized as such immediately. Which means Obama is basically telling the American people who have questions about his legitimacy to f**k off. Which would be completely in character.
Exactly. I said at Neo-Neocon earlier tonight that he's basically giving us all the finger yet again.
"so he's in deep sh*t any way you look at this."
I don't think so, on this issue.
From Beck to Malkin to Levin...they continue to disparage Birthers as nuts.
None have discussed the issue that his father's citizenship disqualifies him.
What this does is marginalizes those who know this is subterfuge.
It does distract from the issue of total transformation of the country
And who is going to enforce it?
The courts won't hear it, the House won't impeach him and if they did, the Senate won't convict him.
Mark Levin says the courts have no authority to remove a sitting president
But, is that "natural born"?In fact, no. At the time of the constructing of the Constitution of the United States, the founders or constructors used the works of The Law of Nations, a 1758 work by Swiss legal philosopher Emmerich de Vattel which stated that a natural born citizen is one of which both parent were citizens of that nation.
"Can we start the war yet...?"
::guitar::
What about that document number. Obama's forgery was 151-1961-10641 shows that he was hatched err born August 4, 1961 while this pair of twins, from the family Norlesbian, who's certificate numbers are 151-1961-1037 and 38 respectively were in fact born a day later, August 5, 1961 and filed by the registrar Aug 11, 1961 while Obamakov's was filed on Aug 8, 1961.
According to the process, the numbers are relavent to the time of birth and not the time of admittence to the hospital. A rubber stamp advances a number for a new certificate. Perhaps they can explain this discrepency, however, I have doubts that they can switch it now that the perverbial cat is out of the bag.
I'm aware that soem here thisnk Dr. Corsi is fruit but try to put aside your preconceptions ofa man that provides footnotes and documents for his work.
Read more here. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=292457 (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=292457)
Holy sh*t. I have a terrible feeling. This is a blatant f**k you to the American people, and I can't think of a reason such a message would be sent to us except to signify that control has been assumed and there is nothing we can do about it.
This is only going to heighten and give legitimacy to the calls for Obama to prove his eligibility for the Presidency. He'll refuse. Then what?We are definitely going to have to arm wrestle the poser and his crime syndicate. We may not win this one with America intact.
Before she would do so, Fukino said, she wanted to inspect the files — and did so, taking with her the state official in charge of vital records. She found the original birth record, properly numbered, half typed and half handwritten, and signed by the doctor who delivered Obama, located in the files. She then put out a public statement asserting to the document's validity. She later put out another public statement in July 2009 — after reviewing the original birth record a second time.
Corsi's take-down at World Net Daily:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=292585 (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=292585)
I know, I know. World Net Daily. But it is what it is . . .
It does have the Isikoff link:QuoteBefore she would do so, Fukino said, she wanted to inspect the files — and did so, taking with her the state official in charge of vital records. She found the original birth record, properly numbered, half typed and half handwritten, and signed by the doctor who delivered Obama, located in the files. She then put out a public statement asserting to the document's validity. She later put out another public statement in July 2009 — after reviewing the original birth record a second time.
Is Fukino still above ground?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42519951/ns/politics-more_politics/ (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42519951/ns/politics-more_politics/)
Has anyone explained U.K.L. Lee yet? Everyone, Republicans included, seem to think an obvious fake signature is no big deal.
Has anyone explained U.K.L. Lee yet? Everyone, Republicans included, seem to think an obvious fake signature is no big deal.