It's About Liberty: A Conservative Forum

Topics => General Board => Topic started by: AlanS on October 12, 2011, 09:44:05 PM

Title: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: AlanS on October 12, 2011, 09:44:05 PM
Bring it on, mofo. ::rockets::

Quote
Occupy L.A. Speaker: “One of the speakers said the solution is nonviolent movement. No, my friend. I’ll give you two examples: French Revolution, and Indian so-called Revolution.

Gandhi, Gandhi today is, with respect to all of you, Gandhi today is a tumor that the ruling class is using constantly to mislead us. French Revolution made fundamental transformation. But it was bloody.

India, the result of Gandhi, is 600 million people living in maximum poverty.

So, ultimately, the bourgeoisie won’t go without violent means. Revolution! Yes, revolution that is led by the working class.

Long live revolution! Long live socialism!”

Crowd: [Cheers.]


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Incredibly, he praises the massacres of the French Revolution’s Reign of Terror rather than Gandhi’s nonviolent philosophy.

And the crowd laps it up.

Every single day, more videos emerge from the Occupy movement showing people saying things that, if they had been said by a Tea Partier, would have been front-page news for weeks and discredited the movement forever. But since it’s the Occupy Wall Street movement, darlings of the media and Democratic politicians, they get a pass.

http://itsaboutliberty.com/index.php?action=post;board=1.0 (http://itsaboutliberty.com/index.php?action=post;board=1.0)
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: charlesoakwood on October 12, 2011, 09:54:04 PM

The Franch modeled their constitution from ours.  The major difference is we derive our rights from God
and they derive theirs from "the people".  Well, the libbers have tirelessly worked to make our constitution
like the Franch.  All things must follow.

Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on October 13, 2011, 06:53:15 AM
I don't fear this trash, but they sure as hell have a rude awakening in store if they think continuing down this path is a good idea...
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: LadyVirginia on October 13, 2011, 10:18:46 AM
I'd suggest these people read up on the French Revolution.  More than likely they'd lose their heads.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on October 13, 2011, 11:41:14 AM
Plus winding up with a Napoleon might suck too...or maybe this rabble doesn't think so...doesn't appear many are capable of breaking above moron-level IQ...
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Alphabet Soup on October 13, 2011, 11:47:26 AM
Plus winding up with a Napoleon might suck too...or maybe this rabble doesn't think so...doesn't appear many are capable of breaking above moron-level IQ...

I thought that's what we have in the Golfer~in~chief... ::eyes::
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on October 13, 2011, 12:01:31 PM
Plus winding up with a Napoleon might suck too...or maybe this rabble doesn't think so...doesn't appear many are capable of breaking above moron-level IQ...

I thought that's what we have in the Golfer~in~chief... ::eyes::

Yeah, he's the smart one of the bunch!

 ::hysterical::
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Predator Don on October 13, 2011, 12:28:28 PM
Revolution...... ::hysterical::

They are not motivated enough to pick up thier trash or get a job so I highly doubt they would be motivated enough to give thier life for thier "cause".

These people are rubes, niave and inexperienced in everything. From thier world view to thier thoughts on animals. They are the pawns in a chess match. Being used by the likes of obama and soros....and they don't understand.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Sectionhand on October 13, 2011, 01:14:22 PM
Yeah ... Right ... And that silly bastard is going to be the first to offer up his life on the alter of Communism ?

Don't think so .
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Alphabet Soup on October 14, 2011, 01:02:23 AM
So the big story on most of the news aggregaters right at the moment is the impending showdown between the Wall Street Invaders and a scrub-brush. Most observers on the scene say that the brushes don't stand a chance.

As a show of solidarity with the filthy commies, I have pledged not to stomp the crap outta any of them (unless they piss me off).
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on October 14, 2011, 07:23:25 AM
So the big story on most of the news aggregaters right at the moment is the impending showdown between the Wall Street Invaders and a scrub-brush. Most observers on the scene say that the brushes don't stand a chance.

As a show of solidarity with the filthy commies, I have pledged not to stomp the crap outta any of them (unless they piss me off).

The OWS jackasses are on private property.  As the owner I would issue an ultimatum to the city...send out the water cannons and disburse these tresspassers and vandals from my property and repair all damage at city expense or be prepared for a lawsuit that bankrupts your damn city!

As is with any gathering of leftists...the area has become a cesspool...

But the owner appears to be a moron...

"The New York Police Department had said it would make arrests if Brookfield requested it and laws were broken.  The deputy mayor's statement Friday said Brookfield believes it can work out an arrangement with the protesters that "will ensure the park remains clean, safe, available for public use," it said."

And Bloomie seems content to let this sh*thole fester some more...

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20111014/D9QC1I601.html (http://apnews.myway.com/article/20111014/D9QC1I601.html)
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: LadyVirginia on October 14, 2011, 09:38:43 AM
According to Glenn Beck, Brookfield is in cozy with Bloomburg, Biden and Obama......

more rich libs making use of the useful idiots because they think they won't  ::guillotine::
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Glock32 on October 14, 2011, 10:38:29 AM
Yeah, apparently Brookfield was on the receiving end of some stimulus dollars....   ::thinking::
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Predator Don on October 14, 2011, 11:22:22 AM


I admit I think differently at times. When I see a group who seem to relish living in filth and a mayor supporting the effort, I say....OK.


......When you have rats who like trash,,,,Then give them trash. It appears the people of New York, the ones who work during the day, have perfect opportunity to clean out their garages and take the trash to the park. I see no problem driving up, opening the trunk and leaving my trash. Maybe, in a showing of compassion, those who work in the area could bring their leftovers from lunch, thier coffee cups, thier bags, chips, etc, and leave it at the protest. Hey, if it is 3 days old, well.

Ever make a stink bomb? I won't go into detail, but as a kid, I have.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on October 14, 2011, 11:34:22 AM
The hilarious part is this idiot wants to clean out that dump, and being a lefty you'd think the other Ruling Class morons running that city would sympathize, but Rush is reporting that city council types are threatening him to STFU.

Ironic, eh?

The Leftnut PTB's all the way up to Lord High Obama himself want this ilk to be allowed to do whatever the hell they want!
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Predator Don on October 14, 2011, 11:47:12 AM
Some enterprising sort should check EPA rules and see if they are creating an enviromental hazard.......Use thier own stupididity against them.

Surely they are destroying clean water and air.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on October 14, 2011, 11:52:07 AM
Yeah, you can't have a few pigs about without having bureacrats threatening fines and imprisonment, so raw human waste (not just the people themselves, their output too) has to be violating several statutes.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Predator Don on October 14, 2011, 11:53:44 AM
Yeah, you can't have a few pigs about without having bureacrats threatening fines and imprisonment, so raw human waste (not just the people themselves, their output too) has to be violating several statutes.


Raw human waste..... Are you speaking to thier bowel movements or the protesters in general?
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on October 14, 2011, 12:15:02 PM
Guess this is nothing new, sadly. The Democrat party has it's roots in racism and violence. Regardless, here are a few other links of note to ponder.

http://pajamasmedia.com/tatler/2011/10/13/more-anti-semitism-at-occupy-los-angeles/?singlepage=true (http://pajamasmedia.com/tatler/2011/10/13/more-anti-semitism-at-occupy-los-angeles/?singlepage=true)
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/dylan-ratigan-the-answer-to-americas-woes-is-obviously-revolution/ (http://www.mediaite.com/tv/dylan-ratigan-the-answer-to-americas-woes-is-obviously-revolution/)
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/11/the_threat_of_leftist_violence.html (http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/11/the_threat_of_leftist_violence.html)
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Pandora on October 14, 2011, 03:28:19 PM
Excellent American Thinker piece, BMG; thanks for the pointer.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: IronDioPriest on October 14, 2011, 03:34:27 PM
Excellent American Thinker piece, BMG; thanks for the pointer.

Indeed.

Quote
Where conservatives can envision resistance to only a government that has destroyed the Constitution, progressives now advocate armed rebellion against a government that won't destroy the Constitution.

Indeed.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on October 14, 2011, 03:48:06 PM
What is scary and what really amazes me however, is that the Leftists are openly advocating violent revolution in the left leaning news on TV and in print. I mean, it's one thing if some nut-job on a blog or out in a crowd says something like that. It's quite another if the nut-job is in a position to say something like to a million people at once. They have been since at least just before the 2010 midterms. The President has even used to the 'bully' pulpit to advocate such things, albeit subtly. That is what's scary and is what keeps me thinking that a (shooting) civil war in this country is coming sooner rather than later. I believe we're in the middle of a (non-shooting) civil war now and have been for a few decades - but I don't think it's going to take much more to boil over.

Hope I'm wrong, but all the stars are aligning here...
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Pandora on October 14, 2011, 04:14:50 PM
What is scary and what really amazes me however, is that the Leftists are openly advocating violent revolution in the left leaning news on TV and in print. I mean, it's one thing if some nut-job on a blog or out in a crowd says something like that. It's quite another if the nut-job is in a position to say something like to a million people at once. They have been since at least just before the 2010 midterms. The President has even used to the 'bully' pulpit to advocate such things, albeit subtly. That is what's scary and is what keeps me thinking that a (shooting) civil war in this country is coming sooner rather than later. I believe we're in the middle of a (non-shooting) civil war now and have been for a few decades - but I don't think it's going to take much more to boil over.

Hope I'm wrong, but all the stars are aligning here...

The left is doing openly what they've been accusing conservatives, and particularly the TEA Party, of doing.  And on nothing more substantial than the left's accusations, we and they were called terrorists.

This gets so convoluted, after a while, it's hard to follow nevermind figure out which end is up.

I have long said we are already in the cold part of a Civil War.  It will go Hot, there will be blood and it will not end well.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on October 14, 2011, 04:22:55 PM
@Pandora: /agree

At least, that's the way it looks from here at this point in time. Hopefully it changes, but I'm not holding my breath.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Damn_Lucky on October 14, 2011, 04:55:01 PM
Quote
Bottom up Top down Inside-out Van Jones
::gaah::Bring it on L'l Man ::rockets::
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on October 15, 2011, 09:42:52 AM
Though not quite the same as actively calling for violence, this article is still related in that, by faking injury at the hands of the authorities, they are attempting to inflame anger toward the authorities and thereby, incite violence just the same.

http://www.verumserum.com/?p=30720 (http://www.verumserum.com/?p=30720)
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: IronDioPriest on October 15, 2011, 11:16:31 AM
Though not quite the same as actively calling for violence, this article is still related in that, by faking injury at the hands of the authorities, they are attempting to inflame anger toward the authorities and thereby, incite violence just the same.

http://www.verumserum.com/?p=30720 (http://www.verumserum.com/?p=30720)

Yup. They are drooling at the prospect.

MSNBC Analyst Donny Deutsch: Says Occupy Wall Street Needs A 'Kent State' Moment (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q21uwB3XNso#)
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Alphabet Soup on October 15, 2011, 11:22:37 AM
Yea, I hear-tell that there's a cry for PMSNBC  to fire donny douche for that. At the end you can see mika objecting but I can't tell if she's sincere or just posing for effect.

And the real question is why? donny was only candidly expressing what they all feeeeeeeel (as opposed to think). Why muzzle him? Are they embarrassed by their own ideology?
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on October 15, 2011, 02:09:27 PM
They aren't the least embarrassed by their ideology, they just don't want to truth behind their ideology exposed...they know their movement would drop dead in its tracks if that occurred.

The moment their takkiya is exposed...it will be the peoples turn to turn on them...

(http://i585.photobucket.com/albums/ss291/libertasinfinitio/Warnings/Donkey20Kong.jpg)

Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on October 15, 2011, 06:47:04 PM
http://trevorloudon.com/2011/10/communists-lead-occupy-los-angeles-movement-nationwide-takeover-planned/ (http://trevorloudon.com/2011/10/communists-lead-occupy-los-angeles-movement-nationwide-takeover-planned/)

"Two prominent members of the Communist Party USA are leading the growing “Occupy Los Angeles” movement. Further, the Communist Party is deliberately infiltrating the “Occupy” movement in other parts of the country, to ensure that revolutionary forces gain as much control as possible."

http://visiontoamerica.org/4837/e-mails-expose-ows-organizers-intent-to-destabilize-global-markets-governments/ (http://visiontoamerica.org/4837/e-mails-expose-ows-organizers-intent-to-destabilize-global-markets-governments/)

"We’re in this for the long haul. There are no “solutions” that can be presented quickly to make us go away. And so there will be moments where our presence is no longer an uncomfortable and unknown variable, but rather is normalized and integrated. It’s in those moments that we have to push the envelop [sic], pry open the space of possibility even farther. We go as far as we can to destabalize [sic], but maintain momentum. And when that’s the new “normal” then we go farther. That’s how change happens, how we shift the terrain and the terms of the game.
- Email in “Occupy” archive, “Re: Can OWS be turned into a Democratic Party Movement?”; Wednesday, October 12, 2011"

Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BigAlSouth on October 16, 2011, 09:12:25 AM
Has anyone bothered to analyze Donny Deutsch's comment? We need a Kent State moment.

Does he mean that the crowd of Anarchists should march aggressively against the authorities, ignoring or defying lawful orders to cease and disperse? Sorry Donny, Kent State is the very reason that the Anarchists will not create another Kent State moment. The OWS kids are weak and not sufficiently believing in a single cause. What was Kent State but a protest against a single cause: The end of the Vietnam War. You think any of these misguided youth are going to die for the "cause" because Republicans took away their art class funding? Or that they are expected to repay their student loans for useless Liberal Arts degrees? Ain't gonna happen.

Sorry Donny. Most of the OWS "protesters" are there for the excitement, the sex, the drugs and the dream that their life somehow has meaning because they are protesting against Capitalism. I just don't see anybody willing to die for that. Taking a crap in Zuccotti Park and vandalizing cop cars is about as far as most of them are willing to go.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: LadyVirginia on October 16, 2011, 10:33:03 AM
I just don't see anybody willing to die for that. Taking a crap in Zuccotti Park and vandalizing cop cars is about as far as most of them are willing to go.

And they'll live off that "glory" for the rest of their lives.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BigAlSouth on October 16, 2011, 11:05:19 AM
I just don't see anybody willing to die for that. Taking a crap in Zuccotti Park and vandalizing cop cars is about as far as most of them are willing to go.

And they'll live off that "glory" for the rest of their lives.

Flash forward thirty years . . .

Hey man, were you at Z Park in '11?

Dude, it was awesome . . .

Yeah. Good times . . .


LMAO
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Predator Don on October 16, 2011, 04:04:55 PM
I just don't see anybody willing to die for that. Taking a crap in Zuccotti Park and vandalizing cop cars is about as far as most of them are willing to go.

And they'll live off that "glory" for the rest of their lives.

Flash forward thirty years . . .

Hey man, were you at Z Park in '11?

Dude, it was awesome . . .

Yeah. Good times . . .


LMAO

As they sit in thier corporate office complaining about taxes..... ::hysterical::
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on October 17, 2011, 09:17:59 AM
And the threats continue...

Dismiss all charges or we'll clog up the courts! (http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2011/10/17/2011-10-17_we_will_clog_the_courts_dismiss_charges_or_else_lawyers_say.html)
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: charlesoakwood on October 17, 2011, 11:37:27 AM

OK, leave them in jail till we have worked through the previous cases, then we'll get to yours.

Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on October 17, 2011, 11:56:09 AM
Indeed, they enjoy living in filth and squalor, so an overcrowded jail cell will feel just like home to this ilk!
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: charlesoakwood on October 17, 2011, 12:15:38 PM

Radio says Noam Chompski, Bill Moyers, and others are emailing and advising the OWS.

Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on October 17, 2011, 12:30:50 PM
In a way I do hope they continue with this because it is really putting these cockroaches in the spotlight. As long as it's just piddly crap like this...unfortunately I realize that eventually it leads to rock throwing, Molotov cocktails and then bullets. That's the leftist way after all. It's just a matter of time.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Pandora on October 17, 2011, 12:34:31 PM

Radio says Noam Chompski, Bill Moyers, and others are emailing and advising the OWS.

I'd be surprised if they weren't.  Betcha Andy Stern's been in contact as well.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: charlesoakwood on October 17, 2011, 12:42:52 PM

Isn't he serving the pizza and tofu?


Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Pandora on October 17, 2011, 12:45:19 PM

Isn't he serving the pizza and tofu?




I do wonder from whence the food comes.  "It just appears and we eat it".
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on October 17, 2011, 12:56:21 PM
Quote
I do wonder from whence the food comes.  "It just appears and we eat it".

Soros has deep pockets...
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on October 17, 2011, 03:04:42 PM
Communists and Socialists and Anti-Semites; Oh My! (http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/280335/follow-red-flag-kevin-d-williamson)

Quote
I’ve been spending as much time as I can down at Occupy Wall Street, listening to the speeches, reading the literature, talking to the organizers. Here’s something to keep in mind: You’ll hear in a lot of the conservative media that this is some kind of socialist/communist enterprise piggybacking on a populist protest. In reality, it is much worse than even most of the conservative media is reporting.

And let us not forget that Obama has publicly come out in support of all this...

I wonder if his crap's finally beginning to stink up there in the ivory towers of the elite?
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: charlesoakwood on October 17, 2011, 03:21:25 PM

Charlie Gasparino just said almost those very words on Fox Cavuto.

Said he walked through the park after leaving the gym.0



Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on October 18, 2011, 10:37:43 AM
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204479504576637082965745362.html?mod=rss_opinion_main (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204479504576637082965745362.html?mod=rss_opinion_main)

I wonder if the democrats that have openly embraced this crowd will start back peddling anytime soon or if they'll ride the bullet train right over the cliff with these flea baggers? It remains to be seen...but I'm in the camp that believes this OWS crowd is helping the Republicans way more than the democrats.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: trapeze on October 18, 2011, 11:07:47 AM
This just being put up at HotAir and AoS:

Protestors discover that it sucks when someone takes your personal property. Irony defined. (http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/criminal_occupation_oh3CnKANUqYHrGPCaZaLRK)

Quote
“I had my Mac stolen -- that was like $5,500. Every night, something else is gone. Last night, our entire [kitchen] budget for the day was stolen, so the first thing I had to do was . . . get the message out to our supporters that we needed food!”

Wealth redistribution...up close and personal. Ah, good times, good times.

Quote
At one point yesterday, Wyman and other volunteers briefly scuffled with a man who was standing near a park entrance with a pail calling out: “Donations! Donations!” -- and pocketing the cash people tossed in the bucket.

I honestly don't know what their problem with that guy was. Sounds like a typical Marxist to me.


Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: charlesoakwood on October 18, 2011, 11:24:07 AM

 ::hysterical::
                   Thanks for that, it brightens the day. What a hoot.
                                                                                             ::hysterical::  ::hysterical::


Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Glock32 on October 18, 2011, 11:24:34 AM
This just being put up at HotAir and AoS:

Protestors discover that it sucks when someone takes your personal property. Irony defined. (http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/criminal_occupation_oh3CnKANUqYHrGPCaZaLRK)

Quote
“I had my Mac stolen -- that was like $5,500. Every night, something else is gone. Last night, our entire [kitchen] budget for the day was stolen, so the first thing I had to do was . . . get the message out to our supporters that we needed food!”


That's good for a full blown donkey-laugh right there. Reminds me of this image:


(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-nrONx1_BIjg/TpRlB34W4jI/AAAAAAAAAAU/HUZth9SCik0/s1600/OccupyMock01.jpg)
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on October 18, 2011, 11:29:00 AM
@Trap:

LOL Yeah.  ::hysterical::

Someone needs to explain to these OWS idiots - when you lie with pigs you should expect to get dirty.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: trapeze on October 18, 2011, 11:38:59 AM
Rush is covering this now with predictable funny point of view.

Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on October 18, 2011, 01:12:40 PM
Quote
I wonder if the democrats that have openly embraced this crowd will start back peddling anytime soon...

Hrm, are they already starting to backpedal? (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/oct/18/obama-passes-meeting-occupy-activists/)
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Predator Don on October 18, 2011, 01:23:31 PM
Quote
I wonder if the democrats that have openly embraced this crowd will start back peddling anytime soon...

Hrm, are they already starting to backpedal? (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/oct/18/obama-passes-meeting-occupy-activists/)


I don't believe it is a backpeddle because obamas so called support is in word only. Political expediency. These people don't actually BELIEVE obama cares, do they?
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on October 18, 2011, 01:27:39 PM
I believe you've got a point there PD and you're likely correct.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: michelleo on October 18, 2011, 11:15:58 PM
Now that I've read through this thread, I'm thoroughly depressed again.  When will the cold civil war turn to armed encounters?  Will these fleabaggers become part of Obama's youth corps mercenaries?  If Obama suddenly gave them a bunch of fast and furious weapons, how quickly would they go rambo on banks?  Big box stores?  Quiet neighborhood streets? 

Ugh...Makes. Me. Sick.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: charlesoakwood on October 18, 2011, 11:21:40 PM

They say, of the original settlers traveling west the gunshot wounds
they most often died from were self inflicted. Not suicidal, just ignorant
of fundamental operation.



Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: trapeze on October 18, 2011, 11:29:11 PM

They say, of the original settlers traveling west the gunshot wounds
they most often died from were self inflicted. Not suicidal, just ignorant
of fundamental operation.





Agreed. When your sole means of familiarity with firearms is from observation via television and/or the movies you are unlikely to know which end the bullet comes out let alone how to actually hit something.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: trapeze on October 19, 2011, 12:59:32 AM
Okay, this was over at HotAir and it's damned funny. Opie and Anthony (who I know of only by reputation) apparently got this chick to punk the protests for the camera...

Occupy Wall Street, I Need Attention - @OpieRadio (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WBLnj2iTqw#ws)

These other videos (also from O&A) were linked to the first one. Not as out-and-out funny as that one but watch them and ask yourself (if you ever thought this), "Why would any Tea Party member or conservative of any stripe want to be even remotely associated with these creatures?" BTW: It's instructive to hit the pause button and read the signs.

Occupy Wall Street is a FREAK show - @OpieRadio (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQlYC8Yjirc#ws)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=iX-zcYygIE8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=pAwRJsYJ8A8#!

Finally, this audio piece where Opie gets the full Allinsky treatment from the crowd:

Opie from Opie & Anthony gets surrounded by Wall Street Protesters (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1URa3y7_jl8#ws)

Quote
Opie was confronted and surrounded by more than two dozen of the protesters, chanting “Pervert, pervert, pervert!“ This is classic ”Alinsky” – In fact, it is right out of  Alinsky’s book “Rules for Radicals” – he taught his followers to:

Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.

Once the target is identified, you freeze it with an accusation so heinous that it must be defended or refuted before anything else can be addressed. The quickest way to run off a nosy photographer is to accuse him of being a pervert. If two dozen or more people start chanting it, the mob mentality can easily take over and trump the truth. Classic Alinsky.

This is just another piece of evidence pointing to the fact that the “Occupy” protests are not spontaneous (as is constantly being trumpeted by supporters on the Left), but rather a manufactured, planned action with paid, trained leaders embedded inside.

LINK (http://www.theblaze.com/stories/sirius-xms-opie-confronted-with-alinsky-like-tactics-at-occupy-wall-street/)
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BigAlSouth on October 19, 2011, 04:59:25 AM
Now that I've read through this thread, I'm thoroughly depressed again.  When will the cold civil war turn to armed encounters?  Will these fleabaggers become part of Obama's youth corps mercenaries?  If Obama suddenly gave them a bunch of fast and furious weapons, how quickly would they go rambo on banks?  Big box stores?  Quiet neighborhood streets? 

Ugh...Makes. Me. Sick.

Whoa there Michelleo. Look at that bunch in the videos. They are too stoned, too lazy, too unorganized and too weak to start any armed insurrection. They want somebody else to do the violent takeover, then they figure they can just show up and get fed when the dust clears.

Let not you heart be troubled. OWS is nothing but street theatre made larger by the fawning liberal media.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: AlanS on October 19, 2011, 05:23:06 AM
Now that I've read through this thread, I'm thoroughly depressed again.  When will the cold civil war turn to armed encounters?  Will these fleabaggers become part of Obama's youth corps mercenaries?  If Obama suddenly gave them a bunch of fast and furious weapons, how quickly would they go rambo on banks?  Big box stores?  Quiet neighborhood streets? 

Ugh...Makes. Me. Sick.

Whoa there Michelleo. Look at that bunch in the videos. They are too stoned, too lazy, too unorganized and too weak to start any armed insurrection. They want somebody else to do the violent takeover, then they figure they can just show up and get fed when the dust clears.

Let not you heart be troubled. OWS is nothing but street theatre made larger by the fawning liberal media.

BINGO! You can't expect these people to actually DO something.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Predator Don on October 19, 2011, 11:05:37 AM
Now that I've read through this thread, I'm thoroughly depressed again.  When will the cold civil war turn to armed encounters?  Will these fleabaggers become part of Obama's youth corps mercenaries?  If Obama suddenly gave them a bunch of fast and furious weapons, how quickly would they go rambo on banks?  Big box stores?  Quiet neighborhood streets? 

Ugh...Makes. Me. Sick.

Whoa there Michelleo. Look at that bunch in the videos. They are too stoned, too lazy, too unorganized and too weak to start any armed insurrection. They want somebody else to do the violent takeover, then they figure they can just show up and get fed when the dust clears.

Let not you heart be troubled. OWS is nothing but street theatre made larger by the fawning liberal media.


If these people were given guns, most would die from self inflicted wounds.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on October 20, 2011, 04:36:59 PM
 ::popcorn::


Lord of the Flies (http://www.verumserum.com/?p=31000)

Quote
One Oakland police supervisor said that the participants first appeared to him as “freethinking activists” but have since devolved into something more sinister. He said it was “interesting for a group that claims to be against current civilization and rules to set up a far more oppressive society than our own.”

Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on October 20, 2011, 07:16:52 PM
Reporter's Life Threatened at Occupy Oakland. (http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2011/10/20/source-abc-reporters-life-allegedly-threatened-at-occupy-oakland-we-shoot-white-bitches-like-you-around-here/)

Quote
Our source, who is fearful of reprisal and has requested anonymity, says that KGO-TV’s Amy Hollyfield was accosted by a man who threatened her and used a racial slur:

    “We shoot white bitches like you around here.”

According to our source, the Oakland Police Department was apparently called to the scene. Inquiries to the police, and to Hollyfield, which began at roughly 8 a.m. Pacific time yesterday, are still unanswered today.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: charlesoakwood on October 20, 2011, 07:46:59 PM
They aren't the pacifists their brothers in NY are.  

Quote

A participant in the protest–who urged his Twitter followers to “punch a banker in the face” and called for the military to join the demonstrators–confirmed that the media had been banned from the Occupy Oakland site, but denied that the protest camp was unsafe.

Later, during the midday broadcasts, only KNTV, the local NBC affiliate, reported the unrest at the Occupy Oakland demonstration.

However, other local media outlets have begun to report the emerging violence of Occupy Oakland. The San Francisco Chronicle reported yesterday: ...


Unrest... reporter is lucky that bulldog didn't take off his arm.

Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on October 21, 2011, 08:22:34 AM
“We shoot white bitches like you around here.”“We shoot white bitches like you around here.”


Didn't get much play in the MFM.


But if was this instead -


“We shoot white black bitches like you around here.”


It would be leading every news story.


 ::cussing::  hypocrites!  They'll start a race war if it's the last thing they do!
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Glock32 on October 21, 2011, 09:48:53 AM
Quote
A participant in the protest–who urged his Twitter followers to “punch a banker in the face” and called for the military to join the demonstrators–confirmed that the media had been banned from the Occupy Oakland site, but denied that the protest camp was unsafe.

Aren't they on public property? Or someone's private property? They don't have the right to "ban" anyone from the site, and this is just one of many reasons these little assemblages should be dispersed. You can bet your ass if a Tea Party event had done 1% of this stuff the mounted patrols would be storming the crowds.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on October 21, 2011, 10:02:59 AM
Yup, more rank hypocrisy an unapologetic surrender to leftist punks!
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on October 23, 2011, 09:04:47 AM
NYU professor encourages OWS to overthrow Capitalism (http://www.therightscoop.com/nyu-professor-encourages-ows-to-overthrow-capitalism/)

Quote
According to the YT video this is a NYU professor who is explaining his socialist dream of America to these hungry OWS protesters, encouraging them to overthrow capitalism and telling them that the only obstacle is the minority of the one percent:

UPDATE: The professor has been identified as Richard Wolff who teaches Marxian Economics.


And right at about 2:44 the crowd applauds Mr. Wolff. I remember reading people defending these OWS groups saying that the 'majority' don't subscribe to rhetoric like this and the anti-Semitic and violent speeches we've seen from them. Well, this group looked to have about 100 or so people in it - a large group for OWS groups - and it appears that the vast majority of them are applauding and cheering when the guy finishes speaking. It occurs to me that these people are indeed, contrary to defender's claims, quite supportive of such rhetoric.

P.S.: GRAPHIC WARNING!!! Annoying 'human microphone' garbage sadly on display in this video!  ;D
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on October 24, 2011, 07:46:51 AM
Yeah, I'd like to see this rabble attempt to do anything more complicated than change their own diapers...

 ::hysterical::
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on October 24, 2011, 08:25:07 PM
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/10/24/atlanta-mayor-to-occupy-protesters-youre-on-a-clear-path-to-escalation-so-were-going-to-have-to-clear-the-park/ (http://hotair.com/archives/2011/10/24/atlanta-mayor-to-occupy-protesters-youre-on-a-clear-path-to-escalation-so-were-going-to-have-to-clear-the-park/)

Quote
He’s backed down twice before but the antagonism between him and the protesters seems to be peaking. At this point I suspect the movement would welcome a police crackdown somewhere to boost sympathy for the protesters. People are getting bored with the story and there are enough freak-show videos from the protests circulating to put off the middle-class supporters that they need.

Wonder if the OWS crowd is hoping for such a  confrontation before the inclement weather sets in and forces them all back to mommy's basement...

In other violent and/or disgusting OWS news we now have a report of a female minor engaging in sexual relations with 'numerous' people at 'occupy Dallas' (http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2011/10/24/accusations-of-teen-runaway-sexual-activity-at-occupy-dallas/), a report of Occupy Oakland protesters storming a bank and vandalizing the lobby (http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/10/obama-endorsed-occupy-oakland-goons-trash-bank-destroy-furniture-video/) and a followup by Zombie to show that yes indeed, the Occupy Oakland groups are filthy pigs. (http://pajamasmedia.com/zombie/2011/10/24/is-occupy-oakland-as-bad-as-they-say/?singlepage=true).
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: IronDioPriest on October 24, 2011, 08:43:41 PM
Wow, that Zombie link at PJMedia of the Oakland mess is incredible. That's photo-journalism.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on October 24, 2011, 09:08:36 PM
I like to peruse Zombie's main website (http://zombietime.com/) to remind myself of why liberals are so utterly repulsive and evil.

For example; whenever a liberal argues with me about how Obama is treated so much worse than Bush ever was I always like to point them to this link (http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=621) and ask them to get back to me when they can justify the crap that they just managed to spew after having perused that page.

I have yet to get one to get back to me with a justification...
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on October 25, 2011, 08:01:49 AM
Wow, great pics, you can almost smell the stench and feel the hate...

 ::puke::
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: charlesoakwood on October 26, 2011, 10:43:14 AM

Raw Video: Protesters Clash With Oakland Police (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpO-lJr2BQY#ws)

scoo be do be doo
strangers in the night exchanging glances
wandering in the night what were the chances
we'd be sharing love before the night was through
shew be do be doo


Occupy Oakland Protest (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlPs-REyl-0#)


Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: trapeze on October 26, 2011, 01:29:22 PM
Well, darn it, they didn't use water cannons...maybe next time.

Lots and lots of pics and videos from Zombie to be found here. (http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2011/10/25/rioting-in-downtown-oakland-as-occupiers-clash-with-police/) I'm busy at work today so I will have to wait until I get home. But that's okay because then I can share them with my daughter and show her what happens when you grow up stupid.

Makes my heart warm to see hippies getting the crap beat out of them.

Go cops!
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on October 26, 2011, 01:38:10 PM
Oh no! OWS getting no luv from CBS?! Say it ain't so! (http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-20125734/occupy-waste-noise-test-neighbors-patience/)
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: trapeze on October 31, 2011, 12:12:46 AM
As the press grows weary of the whole OWS story (it is boring and the children are tedious) the protesters will have to do something to attract their attention again. That "something" is violence, of course, and the left has a long history of violence as a means to an end.

So, then there was Denver: (http://apnews.myway.com/article/20111030/D9QMCJLO0.html)

Quote
Earlier in the day about 2,000 protesters rallying against what they see as economic inequality and corporate greed marched downtown toward the Capitol, setting up the most intense moments of the Denver movement, which has lasted weeks.

A group of the marchers advanced toward the building and some tried to make their way up the steps. About eight officers scuffled with a group of protesters and police confirmed that they used Mace and fired pepper balls - hollow projectiles filled with the chemical irritant - to break up the crowd. Protesters told the paper at the time that they believed police used rubber bullets.

Murray said protesters kicked police and knocked one officer off his motorcycle. He said five protesters were arrested, including two for assault and one for disobedience.

Their next move will be a killing. Or killings. Winter is coming and the nuts will be getting more and more desperate for attention.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: charlesoakwood on October 31, 2011, 12:36:21 AM
Here it is:

Occupy Denver Jerk Knocks over Police Motorcycle (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=turxyoi-Dfk#ws)


Another view:

Occupy Denver man being arrested by DPD 10/29/2011 Frank Roper (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92O-ILLflOA#ws)

Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Glock32 on October 31, 2011, 08:55:32 AM
Perfect opportunity for mounted patrol, body armor on the horses.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on October 31, 2011, 10:30:32 AM
Some interesting developments of late...


http://hotair.com/archives/2011/10/28/flier-at-occupy-phoenix-asks-when-should-you-shoot-a-cop/ (http://hotair.com/archives/2011/10/28/flier-at-occupy-phoenix-asks-when-should-you-shoot-a-cop/)

Quote
If you question their right to detain you, interrogate you, search you, invade your home, and so on, you are very likely to be tasered, physically assaulted, kidnapped, put in a cage, or shot.  If a cop decides to treat you like livestock, whether he does it “legally” or not, you will usually have only two options: submit, or kill the cop.  You can’t resist a cop “just a little” and get away with it.  He will always call in more of his fellow gang members, until you are subdued or dead.

Basic logic dictates that you either have an obligation to LET “law enforcers” have their way with you, or you have the right to STOP them from doing so, which will almost always require killing them.


http://hotair.com/archives/2011/10/28/video-fox-reporter-threatened-with-stabbing-by-ows-protester/ (http://hotair.com/archives/2011/10/28/video-fox-reporter-threatened-with-stabbing-by-ows-protester/)

Quote
A protester, angered by the presence of a news crew inside Zuccotti Park Friday morning, threatened to stab Fox 5 News reporter John Huddy.

What has been an otherwise violence-free period during his six weeks covering the Occupy Wall Street movement, took a turn for John Huddy. He explained what happened during Good Day New York:

“This is somebody I’ve come across several times for the last few days. He threatened to stab me in the throat with a pen. He ripped the mic out of my hand,” said Huddy.


http://www.infowars.com/occupy-phoenix-with-ar-15s/ (http://www.infowars.com/occupy-phoenix-with-ar-15s/)

Quote
Armed citizen militia group US Border Guard is making its presence felt at the Occupy Phoenix demonstration to protect free speech rights, arguing that the second amendment prevents the state from abusing the first amendment.

The group has been labeled “neo-nazis” by the Southern Poverty Law Center, which is usually a demonization tactic, but the individual shown in the clip, “JT Ready” has attended neo-nazi rallies and is closely affiliated with the fringe National Socialist Party.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: trapeze on October 31, 2011, 12:51:19 PM
More developments at this AoS post. (http://minx.cc/?post=323215) More self-proclaimed Marxists and communists threatening violence against the police.

Quote
Alex Callinicos, a professor of European Studies at Kings College in London, announced to his rapt audience, “I am a Marxist.’’

Asked if the upcoming revolution can be non-violent, he parroted the party line of the demonstrators, who call themselves the 99 percent of Americans lined up against the “1 percent’’ with power and money.

He said violence could be avoided only if the “1 percent accept the decisions of the 99 percent,’’ which he predicted would never happen.

Not surprisingly, the police are totally unimpressed with this tactic. In fact, as you will find by visiting the link, the police have decided to employ a tactic of their own. The police have apparently begun to tell* every bum (homeless person) which they run into that there is this really cool place called Zuccotti Park where there is free food available. And free drugs. And free sex. And that they will be greeted with open arms and that they should go there as quickly as possible and stay there as long as they want.

This has not gone over very well with the hippies. But when the hippies complain to the police that they are being over run with derelicts the police basically tell them that they all smell the same to them.

If a lesson could be learned here (and hippies don't learn life lessons very well) it would be that it's pretty stupid to mess with the cops.

Just another reason to appreciate the NYPD.


*No evidence that the NYPD is going as far as to give the bums a ride to the park but that may be coming soon.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on October 31, 2011, 02:24:46 PM
This has not gone over very well with the hippies. But when the hippies complain to the police that they are being over run with derelicts the police basically tell them that they all smell the same to them.

 ::hysterical::

 ::clapping::
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: AlanS on October 31, 2011, 04:46:04 PM
All this time I thought they wanted to help the downtrodden and homeless. ::laughonfloor::
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Predator Don on October 31, 2011, 05:30:10 PM
All this time I thought they wanted to help the downtrodden and homeless. ::laughonfloor::


The homeless must be part of the 1%.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: trapeze on November 01, 2011, 12:30:46 AM
Quote
“He’s got a right to express himself, you’ve got a right to express yourself,” I heard three cops repeat in recent days, using nearly identical language, when asked to intervene with troublemakers inside the park, including a clearly disturbed man screaming and singing wildly at 3 a.m. for the second straight night.

“The first time I’ve heard cops mention our First Amendment rights,” cracked one occupier after hearing a lieutenant read off of that apparent script.

“A lot of you people smell,” a waggish cop shot back later after an occupier asked if he might be able to help find more appropriate accommodations for a particularly pungent and out-of-sorts homeless man.

“The police are saying ‘it’s a free for all at Zuccotti so you can go there,’” said Daniel Zetah, a member of several working groups including community affairs. “Which makes our job harder and harder because the ratio is worse and worse.”

Poor hipsters.

LINK (http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/occupy-wall-street-central-a-rift-growing-east-west-sides-plaza-article-1.969320#ixzz1cQcPi6NR)

Saturday Night Live couldn't do better than this.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: charlesoakwood on November 01, 2011, 01:24:14 AM

Clash of the subcultures.

Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Sectionhand on November 01, 2011, 03:10:35 AM
All this time I thought they wanted to help the downtrodden and homeless. ::laughonfloor::

Only the "Elite Downtrodden" .
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on November 01, 2011, 08:01:15 AM
All this time I thought they wanted to help the downtrodden and homeless. ::laughonfloor::

Only the "Elite Downtrodden" .

(http://i585.photobucket.com/albums/ss291/libertasinfinitio/AntiLeftist/typicalcorruptprogressiverace-baiterdodgingethicsviolations.jpg)
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Pandora on November 01, 2011, 09:02:19 AM
All this time I thought they wanted to help the downtrodden and homeless. ::laughonfloor::

Only the faux pore&starvin'. 
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on November 01, 2011, 11:41:10 AM
I don't think there are any new additions to The List, but it's a good snapshot of OWS allies regardless...

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/this-is-the-comprehensive-list-of-those-supporting-occupy-wall-st/ (http://www.theblaze.com/stories/this-is-the-comprehensive-list-of-those-supporting-occupy-wall-st/)
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on November 01, 2011, 11:47:20 AM
http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2011/11/01/rape-gropes-and-assaults-oh-my-mayor-bloomberg-shut-down-zuccotti-park/ (http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2011/11/01/rape-gropes-and-assaults-oh-my-mayor-bloomberg-shut-down-zuccotti-park/)

Quote
    Q: You said a deaf guy was raped?

    A: Yeah…

    Q: Did the guy, I mean, do these, did that get reported to the police, or did that stay inside the camp?

    A: Well, OK, I’m not sure for that particular incident. Yeah, no I–that might have stayed inside the camp.

She estimates there have been “at least ten” incidents of sexual assault and affirms that Occupy Wall Street has been “unsafe for women” for the past three to four weeks. She describes the failure of security measures taken by activists to police themselves, as well as the reluctance of New York Police Department officers to intervene.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on November 05, 2011, 12:43:22 PM
http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/29683079/detail.html (http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/29683079/detail.html)

Quote
FORT COLLINS, Colo. -- Police have arrested an Occupy Fort Collins protester in connection with a $10 million arson fire that damaged dozens of condominiums and businesses in Fort Collins.

Benjamin David Gilmore, 29, was arrested on Thursday night on suspicion of arson, burglary and criminal mischief.

...but these Occupiers are *JUST* like the Tea Party...really they are!

EDIT:

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/11/ft-collins-occupy-arsonist-identified-as-ron-paul-supporter.html (http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/11/ft-collins-occupy-arsonist-identified-as-ron-paul-supporter.html)

Some new info just released - turns out this guy is a Ronulan!

Quote
OFC Spokeswoman Julia Crisafi said Benjamin Gilmore, who was part of the movement "since Day One," is a Ron Paul supporter. There has been friction between Paul supporters and other Occupy activists, whose views are "a little bit more extreme," she said.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: trapeze on November 05, 2011, 02:21:43 PM
I would say that this video (http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/05/chaos-video/) at the Daily Caller is eye opening but it isn't. It chronicles the violence outside of the Americans For Prosperity conference in DC where the occupiers beat innocent women and prevented luxury cars from driving past.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on November 05, 2011, 03:45:55 PM
http://www.futureofcapitalism.com/2011/11/occupy-boston-occupies-israeli-consulate (http://www.futureofcapitalism.com/2011/11/occupy-boston-occupies-israeli-consulate)


Quote
I can already hear the Occupy Boston people saying the small splinter group that went to the Israeli consulate building doesn't represent all of Occupy Boston, and the Occupy Wall Street people saying that Occupy Boston doesn't represent all of the Occupy movement, and the anti-Israel protesters saying they aren't anti-Semites, they are just anti-Zionist or critical of the policies of the current Israeli government. And some of the rest of them saying that the anti-Israel protesters don't represent all of Occupy any more than Patrick Buchanan represents the entire Republican Party. But at a certain point, one has to wonder why these people are protesting Israel and not some far more abusive government like that of China, Iran, or Syria. I can already hear them saying that America doesn't give billions a year in aid to China, Iran, or Syria.

Still, the whole event illustrates the way the Occupy movement has become a forum for people to air whatever pre-existing grievance or agenda they have, even if it has nothing to do with Wall Street. And how readily a protest against bankers can elide into one against the Jewish state.

Apparently the Israeli Consulate in Boston is part of the fabled 1%...either that or the Occupy crowd actually don't much care for Jews after all.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: charlesoakwood on November 05, 2011, 03:55:55 PM
I would say that this video (http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/05/chaos-video/) at the Daily Caller is eye opening but it isn't. It chronicles the violence outside of the Americans For Prosperity conference in DC where the occupiers beat innocent women and prevented luxury cars from driving past.

I'd like to take a moment to console that fellow in Oakland who, when surrounded by OWSers beating on his Mercedes fled in flight. The two fellows in front of the car will survive.


 
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on November 05, 2011, 04:05:57 PM
@CO:

                                               ::rolllaughing::
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on November 06, 2011, 08:16:14 AM
http://news.investors.com/Article/590706/201111041855/Occupy-Violent-Corrupt-Political.htm (http://news.investors.com/Article/590706/201111041855/Occupy-Violent-Corrupt-Political.htm)

Quote
United Steelworkers President Leo Gerard, speaking on radio host Ed Schultz's show last Monday, declared, "What we need is more militancy." Asked to clarify, Gerard said: "I think we've got to start a resistance movement. If Wall Street Occupation doesn't get the message, I think we've got to start blocking bridges and doing that kind of stuff."

The Canadian union leader then denounced Americans' 2008 election of Tea Party representatives to the House as "nut jobs," and called for more force and illegality: "We ought to be doing more than occupying parks. We ought to start occupying bridges. We ought to start occupying the banks' places themselves."

Looks like they're beginning to escalate their violence. I wonder how long it will be before they get someone killed or kill someone themselves. I wonder what their end body-count will be and if that will open any eyes, still closed to this madness, to how violent and hate-filled leftists/democrats really are. 
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: John Florida on November 06, 2011, 08:35:41 AM
I would say that this video (http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/05/chaos-video/) at the Daily Caller is eye opening but it isn't. It chronicles the violence outside of the Americans For Prosperity conference in DC where the occupiers beat innocent women and prevented luxury cars from driving past.

I'd like to take a moment to console that fellow in Oakland who, when surrounded by OWSers beating on his Mercedes fled in flight. The two fellows in front of the car will survive.


 

  Is the car OK?? That poor thing must have been terrified. ::curtsy4::
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Damn_Lucky on November 06, 2011, 12:42:03 PM
I would say that this video (http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/05/chaos-video/) at the Daily Caller is eye opening but it isn't. It chronicles the violence outside of the Americans For Prosperity conference in DC where the occupiers beat innocent women and prevented luxury cars from driving past.

I'd like to take a moment to console that fellow in Oakland who, when surrounded by OWSers beating on his Mercedes fled in flight. The two fellows in front of the car will survive.


 

  Is the car OK?? That poor thing must have been terrified. ::curtsy4::
Ya it is just a little toed in but should be fine in a week or so.
 ::danceban:: ::laughonfloor:: ::hysterical::
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on November 06, 2011, 04:43:54 PM
I would say that this video (http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/05/chaos-video/) at the Daily Caller is eye opening but it isn't. It chronicles the violence outside of the Americans For Prosperity conference in DC where the occupiers beat innocent women and prevented luxury cars from driving past.

I'd like to take a moment to console that fellow in Oakland who, when surrounded by OWSers beating on his Mercedes fled in flight. The two fellows in front of the car will survive.


 

  Is the car OK?? That poor thing must have been terrified. ::curtsy4::
Ya it is just a little toed in but should be fine in a week or so.
 ::danceban:: ::laughonfloor:: ::hysterical::

 ::thumbsup::

Good stuff!
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on November 06, 2011, 05:40:37 PM
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/my_in_tents_night_amid_anarchy_of_ush5s5NscUZincUN0tF0yO/0 (http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/my_in_tents_night_amid_anarchy_of_ush5s5NscUZincUN0tF0yO/0)

Quote
DiGioia, who is from Clifton, NJ, was shocked to see her alleged attacker’s image in The Post about a week later -- and she identified him to the police.

She is now offering counsel to other victims, as new ones crop up every day.

“I just talked to two gentlemen who were raped last night, and they don’t want to press charges because [authorities] wanted to take them in an ambulance and . . . do a rape kit,” she said.


Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Pandora on November 06, 2011, 05:52:49 PM
WTF pervert is going around raping other men?  They have a religion of piece-er in their midst?
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on November 06, 2011, 06:17:49 PM
It's what happens when you get a bunch of democrats together - speaking of such things, I wonder what the stats are on the pet rapes at these occupy rallies? I know they have dogs and cats there as they are seen in the photos on occasion. We all know that democrats support bestiality and so forth...oh wait, my bad! There aren't any complaints because the critters in question can't talk! Now I feel foolish for not having thought of that sooner...if they can't say, 'No' that that implies, 'Yes' right? No wonder we haven't heard any stats on that...
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: IronDioPriest on November 07, 2011, 10:44:49 AM
WTF pervert is going around raping other men?  They have a religion of piece-er in their midst?

Whatever the perverse motivation of the attackers - predators know where to find victims. There've been parks full of victims announcing their victimhood and proclaiming their lack of control over their own lives for 6 weeks. Homosexual rapists looking for victims are only doing the logical thing by going to these tent-cities.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: charlesoakwood on November 07, 2011, 10:51:06 AM

A target rich environment.

Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Predator Don on November 07, 2011, 10:56:43 AM
They were not raped.....they enjoyed it. ::mooning::
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on November 07, 2011, 03:58:12 PM
http://nation.foxnews.com/occupy-wall-street/2011/11/07/occupy-dc-goons-push-elderly-woman-down-stairs (http://nation.foxnews.com/occupy-wall-street/2011/11/07/occupy-dc-goons-push-elderly-woman-down-stairs)

Quote
Occupy DC Protesters assaulted conservatives as they exited an Americans For Prosperity “Tribute to Ronald Reagan” dinner.

This elderly woman, 78 years old, rode 11 hrs on a bus from Detroit to attend the dinner. After the attack she was taken to hospital with multiple injuries, a bloody nose which developed after the fall, and a large knot on her head. After x-rays and a CAT scan, she was released the following morning with cuts and large bruises.

Can someone please remind me; when was it that the Tea Party beat up any elderly people?
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on November 08, 2011, 07:32:34 AM
http://nation.foxnews.com/occupy-wall-street/2011/11/07/occupy-dc-goons-push-elderly-woman-down-stairs (http://nation.foxnews.com/occupy-wall-street/2011/11/07/occupy-dc-goons-push-elderly-woman-down-stairs)

Quote
Occupy DC Protesters assaulted conservatives as they exited an Americans For Prosperity “Tribute to Ronald Reagan” dinner.

This elderly woman, 78 years old, rode 11 hrs on a bus from Detroit to attend the dinner. After the attack she was taken to hospital with multiple injuries, a bloody nose which developed after the fall, and a large knot on her head. After x-rays and a CAT scan, she was released the following morning with cuts and large bruises.

Can someone please remind me; when was it that the Tea Party beat up any elderly people?

That would be NEVER!

Just like there were no racial epithets hurled by Tea Party people, the fiction that these OWS assholes are peaceful and justified in their actions vs the Tea Party is also complete and utter bullsh*t!
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on November 08, 2011, 11:23:37 AM
Right you are Libertas! Congratulations! *DING*DING*DING* Looks like you get the golden kewpie award!  ::bows:: Now if only the MSM would stop lying for the progressives and start actually reporting the truth...
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: AlanS on November 08, 2011, 11:27:58 AM
WTF pervert is going around raping other men? 

I can guarantee there would have to be more than one for me to be raped.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Predator Don on November 08, 2011, 08:40:51 PM
Next news will be it was Herman Cain.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Pandora on November 08, 2011, 08:52:42 PM
 ::hysterical::

Bad, Don!  Very Bad!   ::hysterical::
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on November 09, 2011, 07:47:12 AM
Uhh, it said "men"...it was probably Sandusky!
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Glock32 on November 10, 2011, 12:18:20 PM
Uhh, it said "men"...it was probably Sandusky!

Would that be his Back Door Blitz package?
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on November 10, 2011, 02:33:28 PM
Uhh, it said "men"...it was probably Sandusky!

Would that be his Back Door Blitz package?

 ::speechless::

 ::rimshot::
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on November 10, 2011, 06:54:26 PM
http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/dc-police-chief-trashes-occupydc#.TrvqyJBjhEs.twitter (http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/dc-police-chief-trashes-occupydc#.TrvqyJBjhEs.twitter)

Quote
Statement from Chief Lanier Regarding Occupy DC

While the Occupy DC movement has been here since October 6, 2011 and the Metropolitan Police Department supports an individual’s right to assemble, we do not condone nor will we tolerate violence or aggression.  Prior demonstrations had been peaceful. However, the aggressive nature of Friday’s demonstration prompted the Metropolitan Police Department to adjust tactics as needed to ensure safety.

MPD will continue to protect life (residents, visitors, protestors --everyone) and property as warranted. The administration will do what’s necessary to maintain order in the city and to ensure that everyone is safe.

Five people that we are aware of were injured. That is no longer a peaceful protest. Demonstrators have become increasingly confrontational and violent toward uninvolved bystanders and motorists. Demonstrators have also jeopardized the safety of their own children by using them in blockades. The following videos highlight such actions by demonstrators:

    Intentionally Blocking Traffic/putting little children in the street
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpDsogOy2IU (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpDsogOy2IU)
    Using little children to blockade the door
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CguFPFJAqlA (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CguFPFJAqlA)
    Demonstrators blockade doors and injure attendees
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prgkEAuSQT0 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prgkEAuSQT0)
    Blockading people from leaving the Convention Center
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXXf56JhTbs (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXXf56JhTbs)
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Pandora on November 10, 2011, 07:15:38 PM
I've had mixed feelings from the start about police involvement in clearing out the OWS idiots.

Once upon a time, when I could trust the police (moreso than today) to be keepers of the peace, public order, truth, justice and the American way  ::confused::  , I'd have had no qualms about them clearing these lunatics out.

Envisioning what they're going to have to do -- all SWATted up as they are -- to restore order in these places has me imagining them wielding their force against folks like us, TEA Partiers perhaps, and I reject the image.

Today, the police forces are a tool best used with the utmost discretion.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on November 10, 2011, 07:24:19 PM
I tend to go back and forth on this. Some days I want the police to bludgeon these idiots back to the stone age...and others, I want them to leave the idiots alone and let them self destruct the democrat party. I feel so...schizophrenic over this.  ::doh::

Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Pandora on November 10, 2011, 07:35:06 PM
As I see it, the best solution would be for everyday people to get a posse together and do the cleaning, backed up by the police.  Keeping in mind, of course, that the Constitutional position on government is that the people, by lending some of their authority to government, does not mean relinquishing the power to act on their own behalf.

This would take the cops out of equation as the driving force behind the clean up and I believe this is how it ought to be.

I am also aware, though, that the worst OWS offender camps are in Blue locations, where such a notion would be considered vigilantism, and, therefore, anathema.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: charlesoakwood on November 10, 2011, 09:10:33 PM

Don't need to hurt anybody. 
Some front end loaders paired
with dump trucks. Follow that
with street sweeper vacs.

Then spread a few cubic yds of
a dirt, fertilizer, seed mixture and
come spring you'll never know they
were there.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on November 10, 2011, 11:36:50 PM
The problem is too many cops go along with their BS union, the latter being in bed so long with Leftists, it's hard to tell where the rank & file come down on individual liberty for everyday folks like us who have jobs, play by the rules, pay taxes and don't act like these jackass spoiled brat OWser's!  Couple that with the all too frequent footage we have of cops going apenuts on people, enforcing statists moves against property owners rights and kowtowing to pc/diversity/multi-culti crap by having outreach officers etc, can they as a group find it so outlandish we distrust them to be able to discern between us and them?!  If the fit reallyn hits the shan I am left thinking I have to look to my own resources first and foremost and avoid contact with LEO's and nutjob's equally!
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: charlesoakwood on November 11, 2011, 12:10:34 AM

One technique they all use to protect themselves is for you to
fear them.  Intimidation, driving 55 or 60 in a 70.  When this
happens have you ever seen it not clog up traffic?  They see us
all as "them".  When we see cops do those things we see them
as "them".  When TSHTF they will be "them" with skill sets and
"they" will be looking out for "their" family.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on November 11, 2011, 06:48:41 AM
And they'll be outnumbered by the public factions...how's that gonna work out for 'em?

Here's to hoping the anarchists on the Left keep them occupied while we successfully egress the danger zones!   ::beertoast::
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on November 11, 2011, 09:03:12 AM
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/11/10/report-man-shot-near-occupy-oakland-camp/ (http://hotair.com/archives/2011/11/10/report-man-shot-near-occupy-oakland-camp/)

Quote
According to witnesses, two men in the encampment got into an argument which escalated into gunfire. The victim was seen running away from the gunman, witnesses said. One bullet hit the Western Federal Credit Union.

The tent village is quiet as police and evidence technicians walk around with flashlights, searching for evidence, and 14th Street is closed while officers investigate. The occupiers were having a celebration to commemorate one month of their camp when the shooting occurred, and now many of them are relighting candles at a memorial set up for Scott Olsen, a former Marine and Iraq War veteran injured in an earlier rally.

As far as I know, this is the first violent death in the Occupy movement in the US. There has been at least one other death but it was said to be related to a drug overdose in the Occupy Vancouver group (http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2011/11/05/bc-occupy-vancouver-death.html) and what looks like a suicide in VT (http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20111110/NEWS02/111110019/Breaking-Police-respond-shooting-City-Hall-Park?odyssey=mod|breaking|text|FRONTPAGE).

Funny, this sort of thing hasn't happened at ANY TEA PARTY rallies...yet we're still maligned as a 'violent' movement.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Pandora on November 11, 2011, 09:49:18 AM
Quote
Funny, this sort of thing hasn't happened at ANY TEA PARTY rallies...yet we're still maligned as a 'violent' movement.

At this point, anyone paying even the scantest of attention to OWS has to be realizing he's been had by the efforts to paint the TEA Partiers that way.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on November 11, 2011, 09:52:04 AM
One would hope Pan - and anyone with a functioning brain cell should indeed be able to come to that exceedingly obvious conclusion...

Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Predator Don on November 12, 2011, 09:20:14 AM
OWS........The rights greatest weapon for voter turnout.

I see it in my business. People who didn't know what they were, sometime sympathetic because of it, now wondering why these groups are allowed to break laws, no permits, drugs, rape, death, etc. It turns off the silent majority....but hey will go vote.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on November 12, 2011, 09:31:14 AM
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2011/11/10/murder-at-occupy-oakland/ (http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2011/11/10/murder-at-occupy-oakland/)

Quote
Chaotic scene followed deadly shooting. Two news photographers were hurt by occupiers who attacked them as they tried to video tape the man who was shot.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on November 16, 2011, 08:04:42 AM
http://www.verumserum.com/?p=33359 (http://www.verumserum.com/?p=33359)

Quote
OWS Protester: In a Few Days You’re Going to See What a Molotov Cocktail Can Do to Macy’s

Just in time for the Thanksgiving Day parade! The headlined quote comes at about a minute in, but there is plenty more of the sort of “non-violent” talk OWS has become known for leading up to this point.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on November 16, 2011, 08:22:15 AM
We need that polar vortex to shoot some bitter cold air through all these OWS slums!

 ::praying::
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on November 17, 2011, 09:15:45 AM
http://www.verumserum.com/?p=33490 (http://www.verumserum.com/?p=33490)

Quote
Rather than just an unordered list, I was thinking it might be helpful to categorize the mayhem by type.

Looks like they can add 'terrorizing children' to the list now...

http://hotair.com/archives/2011/11/17/good-news-ows-mob-chants-follow-those-kids-at-children-trying-to-go-to-school-near-wall-street/ (http://hotair.com/archives/2011/11/17/good-news-ows-mob-chants-follow-those-kids-at-children-trying-to-go-to-school-near-wall-street/)

Quote
    In the middle of thousands of protestors yelling and chanting — some kicking and screaming – CBS 2’s Emily Smith found little school kids trying to get to class. Nervous parents led them through the barriers on Wall Street. The NYPD helped funnel the children, anything to ease their fears while some protestors chanted “follow those kids!”

    “These guys are terrorists, yelling at little kids,” one father said.

    “For them it’s horrible. They’re afraid of all the crowds. We’re not even able to get through. They’re just, he’s … very afraid now,” a mother added.

    One protester followed a father and his little daughter all the way down the block. As the school day ended just after 3 p.m. children trickled out of Leman Manhattan Prep on Broad Street. Smith heard a 4-year-old boy telling his mom he was scared. He told Smith it looked like a parade.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on November 26, 2011, 10:38:37 AM
http://www.verumserum.com/?p=34222 (http://www.verumserum.com/?p=34222)

Quote
Video: Occupy Sympathizer Arrested for Threatening to Kill Gov. Nikki Haley

Quote
Authorities later told him he would be prosecuted and he surrendered himself as you can see in the clip above. The story goes on to note that a similar threat against the President (also made online) was judged to be free speech and not a genuine threat.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: BMG on November 29, 2011, 08:22:15 AM
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/11/28/cornel_west_ultimate_fight_for_entitlements_will_be_in_the_streets.html (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/11/28/cornel_west_ultimate_fight_for_entitlements_will_be_in_the_streets.html)

Quote
Professor West didn't just call for another war on poverty (the first war was fought by Lyndon B. Johnson), but went on to say that the push for more entitlements "is going to be fought in the streets." West showered the Occupy movement with praise for making people aware of the issue.
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Libertas on November 29, 2011, 10:16:27 AM
Cornel West?

 ::hysterical::

That punk is threatening violence?

 ::hysterical::

I could gut that commie punk loser with my smallest pocket knife!

 ::mooning::

Bring it, punk!  Want my address?
Title: Re: Occupy L.A. protester admits: We need a violent take over
Post by: Weisshaupt on November 29, 2011, 10:40:52 AM


Quote
Professor West didn't just call for another war on poverty (the first war was fought by Lyndon B. Johnson), but went on to say that the push for more entitlements "is going to be fought in the streets." West showered the Occupy movement with praise for making people aware of the issue.

Yeah, how did that first "War on Poverty" turn out?  It was supposed to end poverty by giving people a path out of it. Did that work? Or did you end up with more people on the government dole, the destruction of the black family and the economic progress of blacks flat-lining?

Lets have another "war on poverty" , otherwise known as "war against the productive"  and see how that turns out.

Quote
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty. This is known as “bad luck.” - Robert Heinlein


What do you have to say to that West? What?  I am a racist?  Thought so.