It's About Liberty: A Conservative Forum

Topics => Politics/Legislation/Elections => Topic started by: charlesoakwood on March 05, 2012, 12:56:54 AM

Title: The Vetting begins
Post by: charlesoakwood on March 05, 2012, 12:56:54 AM

Questions about the tapes and the expose' of Barak Obama and the continuation of the whole Breitbart enterprise are being answered.   


The Vetting, Part I: Barack's Love Song To Alinsky (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/04/obama-alinsky-love-song)
...
We begin with a column Andrew wrote last week in preparation for today’s Big relaunch--a story that should swing the first hammer against the glass wall the mainstream media has built around Barack Obama.

...

In The Audacity of Hope, Barack Obama claims that he worried after 9/11 that his name, so similar to that of Osama bin Laden, might harm his political career.

But Obama was not always so worried about misspellings and radical resemblances. He may even have cultivated them as he cast himself as Chicago’s radical champion.

In 1998, a small Chicago theater company staged a play titled The Love Song of Saul Alinsky, dedicated to the life and politics of the radical community organizer whose methods Obama had practiced and taught on Chicago’s South Side.

Obama was not only in the audience, but also took the stage after one performance, participating in a panel discussion that was advertised in the poster for the play. ...

...
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Sectionhand on March 05, 2012, 04:51:04 AM
I want somebody ... ANYBODY ... to figure out how Stymie financed his college education . Financial aid applications would tell us 90% of what we want to know . These applications are part of the public record and must exist somewhere ! I don't believe that his grandparents footed the whole bill and it's obvious that his mother didn't earn enough to carry the load . Socialist/Communists like Stymie believe in using government resources to pay for education rather than paying for it themselves . The truth is out there . It's just a matter of digging .
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: IronDioPriest on March 05, 2012, 06:52:54 AM
I want somebody ... ANYBODY ... to figure out how Stymie financed his college education . Financial aid applications would tell us 90% of what we want to know . These applications are part of the public record and must exist somewhere ! I don't believe that his grandparents footed the whole bill and it's obvious that his mother didn't earn enough to carry the load . Socialist/Communists like Stymie believe in using government resources to pay for education rather than paying for it themselves . The truth is out there . It's just a matter of digging .

And people have undoubtedly dug. Which means without question that the information has been sequestered and pathways to it have been obscured or eliminated. In other words, they either know that the revelation would be treasonous, or they want their opposition to spend energy looking for it and speculating on its absence.

There really are only so many factors to this equation.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Libertas on March 05, 2012, 07:22:51 AM
The actions that successfully blanket the real Barack Obama indicates a level of effort usually not seen outside of conspiracies.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: LadyVirginia on March 05, 2012, 08:45:07 AM
The actions that successfully blanket the real Barack Obama indicates a level of effort usually not seen outside of conspiracies.

yep.

I'm sure there's been a concerted effort to suppress or destroy information.  I also think that there are many people who have or had access to information and took it upon themselves to hide it. Also, it doesn't seem to me he hung out with anyone opposed to his ideas so it's unlikely a slew of people exist that will challenge his supposed history.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Sectionhand on March 05, 2012, 10:50:53 AM
The actions that successfully blanket the real Barack Obama indicates a level of effort usually not seen outside of conspiracies.

He also seems extremely comfortable that none of that information will come to light . It's really almost sinister when you think about it .
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: AlanS on March 05, 2012, 05:11:50 PM
The actions that successfully blanket the real Barack Obama indicates a level of effort usually not seen outside of conspiracies.

He also seems extremely comfortable that none of that information will come to light . It's really almost sinister when you think about it .

Looks like arrogance to me.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: charlesoakwood on March 05, 2012, 05:17:05 PM

Hope they get a photo of his face when he gets hit with it.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: charlesoakwood on March 06, 2012, 12:03:44 AM

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/05/obama-ally-hiding-alinsky-tape (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/05/obama-ally-hiding-alinsky-tape)

Sources inform Breitbart.com today that Pam Dickler, director of the 1998 production of The Love Song of Saul Alinsky in Chicago that included a panel discussion featuring then-State Sen. Barack Obama, has a video tape of the play.
...

They didn't say it but odds on there is more to come.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: IronDioPriest on March 06, 2012, 02:35:52 AM
Long-since destroyed, if it existed.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Sectionhand on March 06, 2012, 04:34:39 AM
Long-since destroyed, if it existed.

I doubt it . Even those people like their souvineers . They're saving it for "after the revolution" in order to document Stymie's early dedication to the cause . I'm sure that it's safely tucked away some place . They can't help themselves . It's just one more mark of their arrogance .
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Libertas on March 06, 2012, 06:56:22 AM
Long-since destroyed, if it existed.

I doubt it . Even those people like their souvineers . They're saving it for "after the revolution" in order to document Stymie's early dedication to the cause . I'm sure that it's safely tucked away some place . They can't help themselves . It's just one more mark of their arrogance .

Anybody got G.Gordon Liddy's number?
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: LadyVirginia on March 06, 2012, 11:12:56 AM
Long-since destroyed, if it existed.

I doubt it . Even those people like their souvineers . They're saving it for "after the revolution" in order to document Stymie's early dedication to the cause . I'm sure that it's safely tucked away some place . They can't help themselves . It's just one more mark of their arrogance .

Of course, they save stuff.  They don't see anything wrong with it!
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: charlesoakwood on March 07, 2012, 11:40:09 AM


Obama Protesting at Harvard in 1991 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tz3qShugQ9I#)

                                               Barack Obama in a 1990 video at Harvard protests in favor
                                               of
the cause of Professor Derek Bell and the hiring of more
                                               minority faculty members.

                                               The protest was organized by Professor Derrick Bell who was
                                               the originator of the radical  “Critical Race Theory” and who
                                               Obama aligned himself with while he was a student at Harvard.
Quote
Posted Mar 7, 2012 11:34am EST (http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/at-harvard-obama-dived-into-diversity-fight#HTWF2)

It was perhaps Barack Obama's most intense immersion in the charged campus racial politics of the late 1980s and early 1990s: As President of the Harvard Law Review in the spring of his final year there, 1991, he aligned himself with Professor Derrick Bell's dramatic protest for diversity on the faculty of Harvard Law School.

Bell was the first black tenured professor at the school, and a pioneer of "critical race theory," which insisted, controversially, on reading issues of race and power into legal scholarship.


HT/ Weasel (http://weaselzippers.us/2012/03/07/video-obama-during-harvard-years-demanding-tenure-for-black-professor/)
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: AlanS on March 07, 2012, 04:10:55 PM
I hope it gets better. I don't see anything that will change the media or the pinhead population's mind about the azzhat.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: IronDioPriest on March 07, 2012, 04:19:19 PM
I hope it gets better. I don't see anything that will change the media or the pinhead population's mind about the azzhat.

Here's the thing for me: Breitbart NEVER publicly promised something damaging to the Left and then failed to deliver. Not once. He made a very specific and tantalizing charge when he referred to these videos.

If this release turns out to be a dud, with nothing damaging to Obama, then the tapes that Breitbart referred to have been compromised by his death.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: charlesoakwood on March 07, 2012, 06:19:40 PM

Quote
I don't see anything that will change the media or the pinhead population's mind about the azzhat.

Nothing is going to change the media but portions of the azzhat population have already moved and only need to be kept. This vid which is not attributable to Breitbart but just happened to be released now is another chip, another chink in his
armor.  It probably won't be one big one but an accumulation to cause the crumble.

This video is a tease dangling out there for Bambi and the world to see.  He and all the world, who pay attention, now know that previously unseen video is in the hands of the opposition.  This will not only affect his election politics but the rest of domestic politics and politics abroad.

 "The whole world is watching, the whole world is watching",  to quote his mentors.


Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: charlesoakwood on March 07, 2012, 08:10:02 PM

Another chip:

Derrick Bell was the Jeremiah Wright of academia.

The full tape (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/07/buzzefeed-selectively-edits-obama-tape) of Barack Obama praising and hugging Professor Derrick Bell is now out. It was spliced and diced by the media to avoid showing just how close Obama was to Bell. More than that, a close associate of the Obama campaign, Harvard Law School’s Professor Charles Ogletree, admitted on our exclusive tape:

“Of course, we hid this throughout the 2008 campaign. I don’t care if they find it now.”

Well, we found it. And it is damaging, because Barack Obama was as close or closer to Derrick Bell than he ever was to Jeremiah Wright.

Video and article (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/07/buzzefeed-selectively-edits-obama-tape)

They're talking about it on Hannity.   
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: charlesoakwood on March 07, 2012, 10:09:21 PM
Update: (http://weaselzippers.us/2012/03/07/obama-mentor-we-hid-tapes-of-obama-praising-and-hugging-radical-professor-derrick-bell-before-2008-election/) Video also

 A few quotes from Professor Bell’s 1992 book Faces at the Bottom of the Well:

    “Despite undeniable progress for many, no African Americans are insulated from incidents of racial discrimination. Our careers, even our lives, are threatened because of our color.”

    “ [T] he racism that made slavery feasible is far from dead . . . and the civil rights gains, so hard won, are being steadily eroded.”

    “… few whites are ready to actively promote civil rights for blacks.”

    “ [D] iscrimination in the workplace is as vicious (if less obvious) than it was when employers posted signs ‘no negras need apply.’”

    “We rise and fall less as a result of our efforts than in response to the needs of a white society that condemns all blacks to quasi citizenship as surely as it segregated our parents.”

    “Slavery is, as an example of what white America has done, a constant reminder of what white America might do.”

    “Black people will never gain full equality in this country. … African Americans must confront and conquer the otherwise deadening reality of our permanent subordinate status.”

    “Tolerated in good times, despised when things go wrong, as a people we [blacks] are scapegoated and sacrificed as distraction or catalyst for compromise to facilitate resolution of political differences or relieve economic adversity.”

ETA: Thanks Pan.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Pandora on March 07, 2012, 10:15:38 PM

Update: (http://weaselzippers.us/2012/03/07/obama-mentor-we-hid-tapes-of-obama-praising-and-hugging-radical-professor-derrick-bell-before-2008-election/) Video also

 A few quotes from Professor Bell’s 1992 book Faces at the Bottom of the Well:

    “Despite undeniable progress for many, no African Americans are insulated from incidents of racial discrimination. Our careers, even our lives, are threatened because of our color.”

    “[T]he racism that made slavery feasible is far from dead . . . and the civil rights gains, so hard won, are being steadily eroded.”

    “… few whites are ready to actively promote civil rights for blacks.”

    “[D]iscrimination in the workplace is as vicious (if less obvious) than it was when employers posted signs ‘no negras need apply.’”

    “We rise and fall less as a result of our efforts than in response to the needs of a white society that condemns all blacks to quasi citizenship as surely as it segregated our parents.”

    “Slavery is, as an example of what white America has done, a constant reminder of what white America might do.”

    “Black people will never gain full equality in this country. … African Americans must confront and conquer the otherwise deadening reality of our permanent subordinate status.”

    “Tolerated in good times, despised when things go wrong, as a people we [blacks] are scapegoated and sacrificed as distraction or catalyst for compromise to facilitate resolution of political differences or relieve economic adversity.”


Slavery is an example of what Black Africa and muslims have done and are still doing.

This guy is suffering from an inferiority complex that he expects White America to fix; still dependent on "the White man" to resolve his "subordinate status".  People like him are born with dark skin and somehow it's a White person's fault.

***

Charles, half your post doesn't appear except when the "quote" or "modify" functions are used.  It may have something to do with the square brackets around a couple of letters, but I'm not sure.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: IronDioPriest on March 07, 2012, 11:39:11 PM
My gut tells me that this was not the entirety of the video evidence Breitbart referred to at CPAC. He was very specific about what to expect:

Quote
"Well I've got videos by the way, this election we're going to vet him, from his polished days, to show why racial division and class warfare are essential to what he sold in 2008. The videos are going to come out, the narrative is going to come out, that Barack Obama met a bunch of silver ponytails in the 1980s, like Bill (Ayers) and Bernadine Dohrn, who said one day we would have the presidency, and the rest of us slept as they plotted."

This video shows none of that. And as I've said before, Breitbart did not make idle claims or threats. He delivered, and did not over-promise. When he claimed to have the goods, he had them.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: LadyVirginia on March 08, 2012, 06:55:37 AM
I agree, IDP.  He does say videos.  Let the left make all kinds of excuses then hit them with aqnother.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Libertas on March 08, 2012, 07:39:14 AM
A lot is riding on those videos.  They better exists, they better be untampered, and they better be distributed!   ::oldman::
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: IronDioPriest on March 08, 2012, 09:43:07 AM
I agree, IDP.  He does say videos...

And he indicates that a specific narrative will emerge.

If it doesn't - if this is "it", then I have to believe that Breitbart was murdered, and someone in his inner circle with access to those videos was compromised. The other option would be that for the first time - in his most important revelation - he over-promised something he was unable to deliver, and just happened to die days before its release.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: IronDioPriest on March 08, 2012, 10:01:10 AM
...But On CNN, Soledad O'Brien asks Joel Pollak (with an incredulous, mocking tone), "So is this the video that Andrew Breitbart was talking about at CPAC - is THAT it? What I just showed?"

Pollak: "That was ONE of the materials Andrew Breitbart was talking about. And by the way, those weren't his final words, and this is not his final bombshell. This is the beginning of a vetting process that begins with Andrew Breitbart's probe into Barack Obama's time in Chicago and will continue... and that's why Andrew Breitbart threw down the gauntlet there at CPAC."

 ::popcorn::
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: LadyVirginia on March 08, 2012, 10:16:32 AM
...But On CNN, Soledad O'Brien asks Joel Pollak (with an incredulous, mocking tone), "So is this the video that Andrew Breitbart was talking about at CPAC - is THAT it? What I just showed?"

Pollak: "That was ONE of the materials Andrew Breitbart was talking about. And by the way, those weren't his final words, and this is not his final bombshell. This is the beginning of a vetting process that begins with Andrew Breitbart's probe into Barack Obama's time in Chicago and will continue... and that's why Andrew Breitbart threw down the gauntlet there at CPAC."

 ::popcorn::

 ::hysterical::

How come after 3 years we got Breitbart and these guys still don't?  he knew how to play them and they don't see it.  She really thinks that Ben and Joel would show up wth one video and say that's it? 

Obama got away with saying he just happened to be in Wright's church.  It seems to me that Breitbart Group intends to show a pattern from BO's early days to the present.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Weisshaupt on March 08, 2012, 11:16:37 AM
Obama got away with saying he just happened to be in Wright's church.  It seems to me that Breitbart Group intends to show a pattern from BO's early days to the present.

Typically it goes deeper than that.  Brietbart used to release something so that the left could react to it, and then the next release would but that reaction in a bad light.  Its keeps the story in the news longer, and point out liberal hypocrisy and cover up at every step.   Oh, that was 20 years ago! Obama just like the guy, but he didn't take part, etc.  The point of each release is to force the left to tell another lie and/or exhibit more hate and intolerance, and then reveal more information that highlights their intolerance and incontrovertibly kills their lie.  Every time Breitbart would get them to dig the hole deeper. And no, these people are not capable of the self-awareness and introspection required to detect the rope-a-dope.  They are incapable of shame, and therefore even think about or fear  being shamed or exposed, and hence take no counter-measures.  They have grown so used to having others in their tribe cover for them,  that they really have lost the ability to respond when the truth becomes broadcast.  You know, other than by bullying and assassinating people
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Pandora on March 08, 2012, 11:27:47 AM
What the hell is the matter with Beck these days, anybody know?  This morning, he and his Pat Gray of a sidekick were kind of mocking the vid as "this is what we were waiting for?  What scum hasn't Obama hugged?" -- something like that.  I was listening out of the corner of my ear, so I'm hoping I just heard it wrong, but I don't think I did.

I know Beck and Breitbart had a disagreement, perhaps a falling out, over James O'Keefe's vids in that Beck thought O'Keefe's methods weren't the most ethical, but I don't appreciate Beck not getting Breitbart's strategy after all this time.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: LadyVirginia on March 08, 2012, 11:35:43 AM
What the hell is the matter with Beck these days, anybody know?  This morning, he and his Pat Gray of a sidekick were kind of mocking the vid as "this is what we were waiting for?  What scum hasn't Obama hugged?" -- something like that.  I was listening out of the corner of my ear, so I'm hoping I just heard it wrong, but I don't think I did.

I know Beck and Breitbart had a disagreement, perhaps a falling out, over James O'Keefe's vids in that Beck thought O'Keefe's methods weren't the most ethical, but I don't appreciate Beck not getting Breitbart's strategy after all this time.

I'd read somewhere that Breitbart didn't like Beck's turn to religiousness. Beck kept saying last week that Breitbart wanted to put him out of business.  I kind of felt listening to Beck last week that he was trying hard to be sympathic at the news of Breitbart's death but it was clear to me there were hard feelings.

I find it hard to believe Beck doesn't get Breitbart's strategy but perhaps today it seemed funnier to him to mock it.  Wonder how he'll play it when more information and vids come out?  Is he really going to mock it today and next week or whenever purport to tell us the significance of it all?

Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Libertas on March 08, 2012, 11:38:16 AM
Is this what we are talking about?

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/07/buzzefeed-selectively-edits-obama-tape (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/07/buzzefeed-selectively-edits-obama-tape)
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Pandora on March 08, 2012, 12:11:07 PM
Is this what we are talking about?

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/07/buzzefeed-selectively-edits-obama-tape (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/07/buzzefeed-selectively-edits-obama-tape)

Yep.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Pandora on March 08, 2012, 12:14:40 PM
What the hell is the matter with Beck these days, anybody know?  This morning, he and his Pat Gray of a sidekick were kind of mocking the vid as "this is what we were waiting for?  What scum hasn't Obama hugged?" -- something like that.  I was listening out of the corner of my ear, so I'm hoping I just heard it wrong, but I don't think I did.

I know Beck and Breitbart had a disagreement, perhaps a falling out, over James O'Keefe's vids in that Beck thought O'Keefe's methods weren't the most ethical, but I don't appreciate Beck not getting Breitbart's strategy after all this time.

I'd read somewhere that Breitbart didn't like Beck's turn to religiousness. Beck kept saying last week that Breitbart wanted to put him out of business.  I kind of felt listening to Beck last week that he was trying hard to be sympathic at the news of Breitbart's death but it was clear to me there were hard feelings.

I find it hard to believe Beck doesn't get Breitbart's strategy but perhaps today it seemed funnier to him to mock it.  Wonder how he'll play it when more information and vids come out?  Is he really going to mock it today and next week or whenever purport to tell us the significance of it all?

I'd read that as well and, okay, that's a difference of opinion, but unless Beck had something he didn't want exposed, I can't imagine Breitbart wanting to put him out of business.  AB went after the Left and the hypocrites (redundant, but not always).
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Weisshaupt on March 08, 2012, 12:45:00 PM
Ta-Da!
 The morons spring the trap on themselves again (http://hotair.com/archives/2012/03/08/video-cnn-beclowns-itself-painting-breitbart-editor-in-chief-as-racist/)

For the record, if you look at the entry on Critical Race Theory in wikipedia  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_race_theory)

Quote
Critical Race Theory (CRT) is an academic discipline focused upon the application of critical theory to the intersection of race, law and power.
 Although no set of canonical doctrines or methodologies defines CRT, the movement is loosely unified by two common areas of inquiry. First, CRT has analyzed the way in which white supremacy and racial power are reproduced over time, and in particular, the role that law plays in this process. Second, CRT work has investigated the possibility of transforming the relationship between law and racial power, and more broadly, the possibility of achieving racial emancipation and anti-subordination.[1]
 Appearing in US law schools in the mid- to late 1980s, Critical Race Theory inherited many of its political and intellectual commitments from civil rights scholarship and Critical Legal Studies, even as the movement departed significantly from both. Scholars like Derrick Bell applauded the focus of civil rights scholarship on race, but were deeply critical of civil rights scholars' commitment to colorblindness and their focus on intentional discrimination, rather than a broader focus on the conditions of racial inequality.[2] Likewise, scholars like Patricia Williams, Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw and Mari Matsuda embraced the focus on the reproduction of hierarchy in Critical Legal Studies, but criticized CLS scholars for failing to focus on racial domination and on the particular sources of racial oppression.[3]

To some degree Beck is right. Obama hugged another anti-white america hating radical. That isn't the news. Its the admission of a Harvard professor that they were hiding footage and here CNN steps up to prove the point again. First by lying about what Bell and his theories stood for and then trying to play  the race card, several times, for poining out that Obama was in fact a anti-white racist in College. Watch them fall back on credentials - He was the first tenured black professor at Harvard who felt that white people were inherantly racist- like alcoholics , and therefore our society will be permanently racist because of the WHITE MAN.
Who is Obama's Derrick Bell (VIDEO) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnYM1ZqaKVw#)

Borat  still as that man. A White Hating Fascist Marxist hell bent on destroying American Society. Let justice come.



 


Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: ToddF on March 08, 2012, 12:54:34 PM
Quote
What the hell is the matter with Beck these days, anybody know?  This morning, he and his Pat Gray of a sidekick were kind of mocking the vid as "this is what we were waiting for?  What scum hasn't Obama hugged?"

Well, I'll take on the defense as that's kind of what I'm thinking. 

Obama is hooked up with an Afro Marxist.  Well, duh.  That's O'Tards life in a nutshell.  Something anyone with an above room temperature IQ already knows. 

Those voting for a Sugar Daddy in Chief are not going to change their vote because of this tape.  That's how I see what Beck is saying. 
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Pandora on March 08, 2012, 01:23:00 PM
Quote
What the hell is the matter with Beck these days, anybody know?  This morning, he and his Pat Gray of a sidekick were kind of mocking the vid as "this is what we were waiting for?  What scum hasn't Obama hugged?"

Well, I'll take on the defense as that's kind of what I'm thinking. 

Obama is hooked up with an Afro Marxist.  Well, duh.  That's O'Tards life in a nutshell.  Something anyone with an above room temperature IQ already knows. 

Those voting for a Sugar Daddy in Chief are not going to change their vote because of this tape.  That's how I see what Beck is saying. 

Yes to you and to Weisshaupt, but this is Beck missing the point.  He considers himself the Dot-Connector-In-Chief; he ought to do it in this case.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: LadyVirginia on March 08, 2012, 01:26:41 PM
this is Beck missing the point.  He considers himself the Dot-Connector-In-Chief; he ought to do it in this case.

Ah, yes.  I think his ego is getting in the way of his brain. 


drip...drip...drip...

This vid is the first drip.

Hopefully, it will become a flood.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: AmericanPatriot on March 08, 2012, 01:51:51 PM
Beck was stealing Breitbart's stuff without attribution
Also, Scott Baker who runs The Blaze was from Breitbart, I think.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: CatholicCrusader on March 08, 2012, 02:07:12 PM
My gut tells me that this was not the entirety of the video evidence Breitbart referred to at CPAC................

I hope you're right, because I saw no smoking gun there
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Pandora on March 08, 2012, 02:45:05 PM
I suspect this was just the introduction to Derrick Bell, with more to follow, according to Joel Pollak.  This is not just to vet Obama, but to inform people of just how much the media hid in '08.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: ToddF on March 08, 2012, 02:56:54 PM
Drip #2...SCoaMF taught this garbage to impressionable youngins who's parents were dumb enough to send their little brats to the U of Chitcago.

Still isn't going to change the vote for those looking for a Sugar Daddy in Chief.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Predator Don on March 08, 2012, 05:01:56 PM
Drip #2...SCoaMF taught this garbage to impressionable youngins who's parents were dumb enough to send their little brats to the U of Chitcago.

Still isn't going to change the vote for those looking for a Sugar Daddy in Chief.


obama could be sticking a shank in someones back, admit his birth certificate is fake, while listening to Rev Wright on his I pod, smoking a joint and holding his boytoys wanker with his other hand and it would not matter.

If America(N)s are not motivated enough to vote this guy out, a few tapes are not gonna help.

We are a nation of stupid people. The only outrage that could hurt obama with his base of stupidity is if he interupts American Idol.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: charlesoakwood on March 08, 2012, 05:45:09 PM

It's the movies, they love the movies.  Shhh look at that! 
These things are going to go slooow, the punch line won't
come until there's a much larger audience and it's very close
to election day.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: AlanS on March 08, 2012, 07:59:39 PM
We used to have a Governor here in LA by the name of Edwin Edwards. A populist to the extreme. When it was time for re-election, he said "They only way I can lose is if they find me in bed with a little boy or a dead woman." That's the exact ego I see in Duh Won and I'm beginning to think that's what it would take. Everyone with any kind of observation powers KNOWS the SCFofMF is a socialistic bastard. If anyone doesn't know it by now, they don't care and I don't think there's damn thing that will change their mind.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Alphabet Soup on March 08, 2012, 08:06:58 PM
What the hell is the matter with Beck these days, anybody know?  This morning, he and his Pat Gray of a sidekick were kind of mocking the vid as "this is what we were waiting for?  What scum hasn't Obama hugged?" -- something like that.  I was listening out of the corner of my ear, so I'm hoping I just heard it wrong, but I don't think I did.

I know Beck and Breitbart had a disagreement, perhaps a falling out, over James O'Keefe's vids in that Beck thought O'Keefe's methods weren't the most ethical, but I don't appreciate Beck not getting Breitbart's strategy after all this time.

I'd read somewhere that Breitbart didn't like Beck's turn to religiousness. Beck kept saying last week that Breitbart wanted to put him out of business.  I kind of felt listening to Beck last week that he was trying hard to be sympathic at the news of Breitbart's death but it was clear to me there were hard feelings.

I find it hard to believe Beck doesn't get Breitbart's strategy but perhaps today it seemed funnier to him to mock it.  Wonder how he'll play it when more information and vids come out?  Is he really going to mock it today and next week or whenever purport to tell us the significance of it all?



I'm with AB. If I wanted a preacher I would have picked a better one than beck. And lately if I want a pundit I go elsewhere as well...
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Alphabet Soup on March 08, 2012, 08:09:38 PM
What the hell is the matter with Beck these days, anybody know?  This morning, he and his Pat Gray of a sidekick were kind of mocking the vid as "this is what we were waiting for?  What scum hasn't Obama hugged?" -- something like that.  I was listening out of the corner of my ear, so I'm hoping I just heard it wrong, but I don't think I did.

I know Beck and Breitbart had a disagreement, perhaps a falling out, over James O'Keefe's vids in that Beck thought O'Keefe's methods weren't the most ethical, but I don't appreciate Beck not getting Breitbart's strategy after all this time.

I'd read somewhere that Breitbart didn't like Beck's turn to religiousness. Beck kept saying last week that Breitbart wanted to put him out of business.  I kind of felt listening to Beck last week that he was trying hard to be sympathic at the news of Breitbart's death but it was clear to me there were hard feelings.

I find it hard to believe Beck doesn't get Breitbart's strategy but perhaps today it seemed funnier to him to mock it.  Wonder how he'll play it when more information and vids come out?  Is he really going to mock it today and next week or whenever purport to tell us the significance of it all?



I'm with AB. If I wanted a preacher I would have picked a better one than beck. And lately if I want a pundit I go elsewhere as well...

OK now to speak to the main topic...

I haven't had a chance to check out what the loonies are saying but I imagine that it's aligned with sol-daddy. If they don't see anything wrong with hanging out with a terrorist like ayers what's the big deal about giving props to a  marxist fellow traveler?

Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: charlesoakwood on March 08, 2012, 10:03:40 PM

[blockquote]http://minx.cc/?post=327345 (http://minx.cc/?post=327345)

Wikipedia Entry for 'Critical Race Theory' Changed Today

—rdbrewer

In the version dated January 31, 2012, the words "white supremacy" and "racial power" appear.

    Although no set of canonical doctrines or methodologies defines CRT, the movement is loosely unified by two common areas of inquiry. First, CRT has analyzed the way in which white supremacy and racial power are reproduced over time, and in particular, the role that law plays in this process.

(Emphasis added.) However, the current version states the following:

    Although no set of canonical doctrines or methodologies defines CRT, the movement is loosely unified by two common areas of inquiry. First, CRT has analyzed the way in which racial hierarchies are reproduced over time, and in particular, the role that law plays in this process.

(Emphasis added.) You can see both versions on this page. If you go to the revision page, it looks like a little war broke out today, with edits and re-edits. One participant commented that it had obviously been changed to match "Soledad Obrien's empty-headed explanation on television last night."

Busted!

Follow me on Twitter. (http://www.twitter.com/rdbrewer4)[/blockquote]


Yeah, they're paying attention.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Pandora on March 08, 2012, 10:10:35 PM
Oh yeah, they're paying attention and they're covering their asses as fast as they can, the farging iceholes.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: charlesoakwood on March 08, 2012, 10:16:03 PM

All I can say to 'em is 'pucker up' it's coming.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Pandora on March 08, 2012, 10:19:21 PM

All I can say to 'em is 'pucker up' it's coming.

Oh Charles!  They have no idea.

 ::overkill::

We're coming for you, muthaaaaaas .............
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Weisshaupt on March 08, 2012, 10:49:09 PM
Oh yeah, they're paying attention and they're covering their asses as fast as they can, the farging iceholes.

You know..I suspected someone would reedit that when I got it off wikipedia this morning...
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Pandora on March 08, 2012, 11:04:40 PM
Oh yeah, they're paying attention and they're covering their asses as fast as they can, the farging iceholes.

You know..i suspected someone would reedit that when i git it off wkipedia this morning...

Yah. Well.  You know what they say; screw 'em and te 'orse 'ey rode in on.  Wiki is notoriously unreliable as regards politics.  Trouble widdat is ever'thing is politics these days.

Tired of playin'. 
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Weisshaupt on March 08, 2012, 11:25:22 PM


Yah. Well.  You know what they say; screw 'em and te 'orse 'ey rode in on.  Wiki is notoriously unreliable as regards politics.  Trouble widdat is ever'thing is politics these days.

Tired of playin'. 

The hilarious thing was that the first line in wikipedia  was verbatium what she said on air-- like some intern was reading it to her over her earpiece. Google It? Just did.
Fine. Explain the theory then.  Oh, don't bother, I am sure Breitbart will be allowing Derrek Bell to explain it in his own words over the next couple of days. After all, I am sure Andrew wanted them to lie about it, so he could then hang them with it.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: charlesoakwood on March 08, 2012, 11:46:07 PM
oopsie, another little drip:

                                     Logs Show Derrick Bell Visited White House Twice In 2010… (http://weaselzippers.us/2012/03/08/logs-show-derrick-bell-visited-white-house-twice-in-2010/)

ETA: drowning by a thousand drips
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: charlesoakwood on March 08, 2012, 11:49:30 PM

Derrick Bell: They Give "White Boys" Tenure (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBcwQIf5q3U#)

They give "White Boys" Tenure


Is it starting to sprinkle?

[blockquote]
Barack Obama made his own students[ (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/08/obama-made-bell-required-reading-chicago) at the University of Chicago Law School read some of Derrick Bell's most radical and racially inflammatory writings.

In 1994,... [/blockquote]


Nah, it's just a heavy dew.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: charlesoakwood on March 12, 2012, 04:14:21 PM

Chicago Communist Congressman Danny Davis wins award for his role promoting young Barack Obama.

[blockquote]

Obama: Communist-Recognized Congressman 'Shares Our Values' (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/12/danny-davis-he-shares-our-values)



Quote
Image:
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/ai87WX1k6y1OCaeDpo_g7mOK8XyE8ntmerTfXF7O285zd-F2Vj2J1L5oSZ1cJd8JLXvdeXTBsksbBqHkVQendt0yR4bnl9hdL5UC-ybL1xNmh3i3G40 (https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/ai87WX1k6y1OCaeDpo_g7mOK8XyE8ntmerTfXF7O285zd-F2Vj2J1L5oSZ1cJd8JLXvdeXTBsksbBqHkVQendt0yR4bnl9hdL5UC-ybL1xNmh3i3G40)
Image:
Quote
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/wOpHlFMADIRp4UCjJ9qUtXnHbevdw8Dq7AJkHHLFw5Qc9Z_SMMNJDxDSWsy6KQDqfGtkNN11ZeCjCQeN6l9mHMGub7jYiaRah-11FV-QtPg-9BQrxm4 (https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/wOpHlFMADIRp4UCjJ9qUtXnHbevdw8Dq7AJkHHLFw5Qc9Z_SMMNJDxDSWsy6KQDqfGtkNN11ZeCjCQeN6l9mHMGub7jYiaRah-11FV-QtPg-9BQrxm4)


“He is one on the greatest congressmen in the country,” said President Obama. [The reason], “is because he shares our values.”

...Congressman Danny Davis was continuing his efforts to help move then-State Senator Obama up the Chicago political food chain.  ...Congressman Davis was honored by People’s World, ... for a lifetime of “inspiring leadership.”

...the People’s World “Chris Hani & Rudy Lozano Social Justice Award,”
...

Chris Hani:

an anti-apartheid activist
chief-of-staff in the armed branch of the African National Congress.
spent much of his life in exile from South Africa
received military training in the Soviet Union,
returning to South Africa in 1990.
In 1991, he took over the South African Communist Party,
in 1993 he was assassinated.

Rudy Lozano:

a community organizer in Chicago.
He was credited with bringing Latino voters to support the former mayor of Chicago, Harold Washington.
shot to death in his home by Gregory Escobar for allegedly failing to pay off a $7,000 drug debt.
 [/blockquote]

This is just a snip of the article. Read it all Here (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/12/danny-davis-he-shares-our-values)


Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: AlanS on March 12, 2012, 07:47:57 PM
I'm still not feeling it. To me it's all preaching to the choir. I still don't see the "Independents" soaking this up. If we can't get arrests and imprisonment from Fast and Furious, I don't see this "vetting" accomplishing anything.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: charlesoakwood on March 12, 2012, 08:31:43 PM
I'm still not feeling it. To me it's all preaching to the choir. I still don't see the "Independents" soaking this up. If we can't get arrests and imprisonment from Fast and Furious, I don't see this "vetting" accomplishing anything.

You're correct that it may not catch on.  It took a while for Breitbart's expose' of ACORN
to catch on also.  The thing is others are watching, http://itsaboutliberty.com/index.php/topic,5034.msg56028.html#msg56028 (http://itsaboutliberty.com/index.php/topic,5034.msg56028.html#msg56028) ,  and if the bow breaks that baby's going to fall. 
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: charlesoakwood on March 15, 2012, 12:24:15 PM

Cassandra Butts is an important example of how Critical Race Theory
and its adherents continue to shape President Barack Obama's worldview and his administration
(http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/14/Cassandra%20Butts%20Obama%20Advisor%20Bell%20Devotee%20Packing%20the%20Bench)

  Butts:  student advocate of Professor Derrick Bell’s strike for "faculty diversity."
  ...
  ...in the Obama White House: Rep. Harold Ford Jr. noted on MSNBC on January 22, 2009--shortly after Obama's inauguration--that Butts is “a dear, dear friend of the president” who “will watch his policy back,” and “will be
  willing to sort of reach out into Washington and sort of delve deeper and try to find some serious  
  public policy answers.”
  ...
  Butts: "We’re asking simply for a person of color or someone who’s underrepresented here. We’re asking for  
  people of color who have a scholarship that has a particular perspective on the law
.
  ...
  Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan, who once lectured on Critical Race Theory, is also known to  
  have somewhat radical views on the Constitution, though these were not fully vetted during her Senate  
  confirmation hearings. In 2008, then-Harvard Law School Dean Kagan blurbed Sanford Levinson's book,  
  Our Undemocratic Constitution: Where the Constitution Goes Wrong (And How We the People Can Correct  
  It)
(emphasis added): [blockquote]   A lucidly written and compelling work, Our Undemocratic Constitution  
  asks hard questions about the nature of our founding document. Levinson, who is one of the nation's leading  
  constitutional scholars, argues here that much about the Constitution stands in need of dramatic change. This
  is a timely and important book, and our country would benefit if its ideas provoked real debate.[/blockquote]

This article (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/14/Cassandra%20Butts%20Obama%20Advisor%20Bell%20Devotee%20Packing%20the%20Bench) illustrates his long term association with persons advocating black liberation theology and contains information that may have stopped Kagan from ascending to the Supreme Court.  It illuminates the fundamental thinking of Barack Obama.  It will not create a firestorm but it is another basic element in the case that will be made.

Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Libertas on March 15, 2012, 12:57:33 PM
Should be a lot of gawddamned BUTTS being bounced out!

All the way out of my nation!!!

 ::asskicking::
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: charlesoakwood on March 15, 2012, 01:49:16 PM

Link (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/11/Jeremiah%20Wright%20Derrick%20Bell%20Phil%20Donohue%20Sermon%20Barack%20Obama)

...
Jesus is a perfect model for the best type of faith. Jesus had a faith that did not avoid the realities of race. Modern reasoning tries to avoid the issue of race and pretend that race doesn't really matter.

That is a lie. Race does matter. ...
                                                  _ Jeremiah Wright   
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: charlesoakwood on May 25, 2012, 08:41:22 PM
‘Choom Gang’ (http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/05/obama-and-his-pot-smoking-choom-gang/)

Obama as not just a pot smoker, but a pot-smoking innovator.
...
“Wasting good bud smoke was not tolerated.”

...
One notable exception was Ray, the group’s pot dealer who, known for his ability “to score quality bud,” would years later be killed by a scorned gay lover armed with a ball-peen hammer.

ETA: The picture book version ->  http://www.buzzfeed.com/gavon/a-users-guide-to-smoking-pot-with-barack-obama
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: Pandora on May 25, 2012, 09:45:46 PM
You know, growing up, and for a long time after, I never stopped to consider the American people would elect some of the most depraved to the presidency, it was something that dawned on me gradually.

What a most happy realization.   ::saywhat::
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: AlanS on May 26, 2012, 09:20:55 AM
What a most happy realization.   ::saywhat::

Kind of like realizing you have hemorrhoids.
Title: Re: The Vetting begins
Post by: charlesoakwood on May 31, 2012, 11:21:05 PM

Allen West has something to say about it.

Allen West Discusses Iraq Incident, Obama Using Blow (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cLt9bRnldA#ws)