It's About Liberty: A Conservative Forum
Topics => Media Bias/Media War => Topic started by: Libertas on February 17, 2019, 02:22:21 PM
-
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6714353/Trump-says-Alec-Baldwins-Saturday-night-Live-parody-looked-into.html (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6714353/Trump-says-Alec-Baldwins-Saturday-night-Live-parody-looked-into.html)
I would argue a RICO case as well, based upon their willful and coordinated information terrorism!
Break them!!! Do it!!!
-
https://www.mediaite.com/online/cbss-lara-logan-calls-media-mostly-liberal-in-scorched-earth-interview-im-committing-professional-suicide/ (https://www.mediaite.com/online/cbss-lara-logan-calls-media-mostly-liberal-in-scorched-earth-interview-im-committing-professional-suicide/)
Making my case. They will never reform themselves, they need to be broken up first. And penalties for disinformation, lies...as well as libel and slander laws beefed up need to happen yesterday!
-
Absolutely. Freedom of speech was never intended to mean that the media can be biased one way or the other. Break 'em up, diossolve 'em, lock 'em up if they resist. There's more than one swamp that needs draining.
-
Absolutely. Freedom of speech was never intended to mean that the media can be biased one way or the other. Break 'em up, diossolve 'em, lock 'em up if they resist. There's more than one swamp that needs draining.
The press has always been biased, one way or the other. The difference in the past was that both sides were represented and were very clear about which side they favored.
-
They're very free to be biased. I, as well as President Trump, are also very free to call them out on their fraud, and to mock them at every step.
People are also very free to sue them, when they go over the line and commit libel.
-
Way heavily tilted, and naked as hell and not hiding it. I got in a running verbal battle with the editors at the Red Star over two decades ago...miserable SOB's editing my submissions for LTTE, started changing the essence and very meaning of what I intended, lit their asses up, kept hounding them, then they did their usual cowardly thing and ignored me. I did some stuff after that of an anonymous nature, took pleasure watching their subscriptions melt, their staffing shrink. The editing, the bias-slant...that's the soft censorship and disinformation...the blackballing of voices, the shutting down of interaction, manufactured polling, incestuous use of experts and attention-whores...that's crossing into hard censorship and manipulation. Socialist Media is even worse with it, since it has largely replaced the old media for many, Google, Twitter, Facebook etc...they are the Gestapo of the Goebbels Media. They deserve no quarter, no mercy! They deserve Liberty Poles, tar & feathering, being run out on a rail or put in a pillory...at the least!
This is a start - https://itsaboutliberty.com/index.php/topic,16870.new.html#new
And I think a NYT v Sullivan reversal is problematic and the very least under the Dread Traitor Roberts Court...but to get at the wider perfidy of BigMedia is going to call for a big-ass hammer like Anti-Trust and RICO cases...or we just settle it with everything else when the flare goes up and CWII goes kinetic.
Either way, the time for all fascisti is drawing ever shorter!
-
Oh sorry, didn't mean to!
https://www.businessinsider.com/nest-microphone-was-never-supposed-to-be-a-secret-2019-2 (https://www.businessinsider.com/nest-microphone-was-never-supposed-to-be-a-secret-2019-2)
All is well? Uh, yeah...umm, no!
What they meant was "Oh, caught that did ya? What's the big deal?".
Just giving the customer DeepState what they want.
-
I look with justified skepticism on any FTC efforts...that body is too political and too toothless.
It's not just FascistBook (https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/02/27/facebook-insider-leaks-docs/) it is all socialist media and 90% of presscorpse and most of the BigTech giants. They all need to be broken apart. And penalties for slander, libel and and lying and manipulating have to be immediate and severe.
Otherwise people are just admitting they are not serious about the problem.
-
A small start...
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/03/florida-state-sen-joe-gruters-files-legislation-to-punish-twitter-and-facebook-for-conservative-censorship/ (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/03/florida-state-sen-joe-gruters-files-legislation-to-punish-twitter-and-facebook-for-conservative-censorship/)
-
(https://qposts.online/assets/images/c8434c690a926ed4efff180c913cbd0721be2a8f3c5f6244ba1699c546447a8e.jpg)
https://qposts.online/post/2995
https://sputniknews.com/us/201903071073021386-zuckerberg-plans-build-privacy-focused-facebook/?utm_source=https://qposts.online/&utm_medium=short_url&utm_content=kSJj&utm_campaign=URL_shortening
-
Absolutely. Freedom of speech was never intended to mean that the media can be biased one way or the other. Break 'em up, diossolve 'em, lock 'em up if they resist. There's more than one swamp that needs draining.
The press has always been biased, one way or the other. The difference in the past was that both sides were represented and were very clear about which side they favored.
Exactly. The way that they're behaving now is totally unprecedented. I cannot wait for Trump to have Jake Tapper arrested for disrespecting the government and lying to the people.
-
Absolutely. Freedom of speech was never intended to mean that the media can be biased one way or the other. Break 'em up, diossolve 'em, lock 'em up if they resist. There's more than one swamp that needs draining.
The press has always been biased, one way or the other. The difference in the past was that both sides were represented and were very clear about which side they favored.
Exactly. The way that they're behaving now is totally unprecedented. I cannot wait for Trump to have Jake Tapper arrested for disrespecting the government and lying to the people.
This is the USA, not Russia, Venezuela or China, so what you're suggesting is not done for those reasons.
Jeez, kid, what's up witchoo?
-
(https://qposts.online/assets/images/c8434c690a926ed4efff180c913cbd0721be2a8f3c5f6244ba1699c546447a8e.jpg)
https://qposts.online/post/2995
https://sputniknews.com/us/201903071073021386-zuckerberg-plans-build-privacy-focused-facebook/?utm_source=https://qposts.online/&utm_medium=short_url&utm_content=kSJj&utm_campaign=URL_shortening
So, he admits he wasn't "privacy-based" before? Gosh, thanks for the heads up Markie! What's next? Admitting you blacklist non-progressive voices? Yeah, I bet BigBroBook 2.0 going to have even better government access and blacklist capability than 1.0!
What a POS! Why is this fraud not in prison?
Oh yeah...right ideological connections!
PS-Seen that FB/Lifelog info before...priceless...and not surprising...always easier to let a "private" entity be the front of a government op than a government agency!
Fools most of the ::bus:: public.
-
I just stay off FB and any other platform like if.
-
Absolutely. Freedom of speech was never intended to mean that the media can be biased one way or the other. Break 'em up, diossolve 'em, lock 'em up if they resist. There's more than one swamp that needs draining.
The press has always been biased, one way or the other. The difference in the past was that both sides were represented and were very clear about which side they favored.
Exactly. The way that they're behaving now is totally unprecedented. I cannot wait for Trump to have Jake Tapper arrested for disrespecting the government and lying to the people.
This is the USA, not Russia, Venezuela or China, so what you're suggesting is not done for those reasons.
Jeez, kid, what's up witchoo?
Then why did the founders specifically lay out a section on Treason in the Constitution? IMO severely underused.
-
Absolutely. Freedom of speech was never intended to mean that the media can be biased one way or the other. Break 'em up, diossolve 'em, lock 'em up if they resist. There's more than one swamp that needs draining.
The press has always been biased, one way or the other. The difference in the past was that both sides were represented and were very clear about which side they favored.
Exactly. The way that they're behaving now is totally unprecedented. I cannot wait for Trump to have Jake Tapper arrested for disrespecting the government and lying to the people.
This is the USA, not Russia, Venezuela or China, so what you're suggesting is not done for those reasons.
Jeez, kid, what's up witchoo?
Then why did the founders specifically lay out a section on Treason in the Constitution? IMO severely underused.
Jeez, Lou...go read Article III, Section 3...it lays out what has to be done, and it would be a trial by jury in Federal Court...find a Prosecutor willing to give it a go and bring another collaborating witness with you. The burden to prove that is high...but go for it, I'll cheer you on. IMO best and quickest way is to go for their power and pocketbook.
-
Absolutely. Freedom of speech was never intended to mean that the media can be biased one way or the other. Break 'em up, diossolve 'em, lock 'em up if they resist. There's more than one swamp that needs draining.
The press has always been biased, one way or the other. The difference in the past was that both sides were represented and were very clear about which side they favored.
Exactly. The way that they're behaving now is totally unprecedented. I cannot wait for Trump to have Jake Tapper arrested for disrespecting the government and lying to the people.
This is the USA, not Russia, Venezuela or China, so what you're suggesting is not done for those reasons.
Jeez, kid, what's up witchoo?
Then why did the founders specifically lay out a section on Treason in the Constitution? IMO severely underused.
You go find me, specifically, the "section" of the Constitution that lays out the President's authority to arrest a Jake Tapper or any other news-person on the grounds of Treason for "disrespecting the government and lying to the people".
-
I guess the crickets won that challenge, eh?
-
I guess the crickets won that challenge, eh?
You calling me a cricket? ::saywhat::
I don't mind questioning, but that's not what he's doing, he's being a Gamma.
-
Absolutely. Freedom of speech was never intended to mean that the media can be biased one way or the other. Break 'em up, diossolve 'em, lock 'em up if they resist. There's more than one swamp that needs draining.
The press has always been biased, one way or the other. The difference in the past was that both sides were represented and were very clear about which side they favored.
Exactly. The way that they're behaving now is totally unprecedented. I cannot wait for Trump to have Jake Tapper arrested for disrespecting the government and lying to the people.
This is the USA, not Russia, Venezuela or China, so what you're suggesting is not done for those reasons.
Jeez, kid, what's up witchoo?
Then why did the founders specifically lay out a section on Treason in the Constitution? IMO severely underused.
Jeez, Lou...go read Article III, Section 3...it lays out what has to be done, and it would be a trial by jury in Federal Court...find a Prosecutor willing to give it a go and bring another collaborating witness with you. The burden to prove that is high...but go for it, I'll cheer you on. IMO best and quickest way is to go for their power and pocketbook.
President Trump is in charge appointing district attorneys. He needs to fire the lot of them and appoint the ones which will do the work that needs to be done, by FIXING the evil lying media.
-
Absolutely. Freedom of speech was never intended to mean that the media can be biased one way or the other. Break 'em up, diossolve 'em, lock 'em up if they resist. There's more than one swamp that needs draining.
The press has always been biased, one way or the other. The difference in the past was that both sides were represented and were very clear about which side they favored.
Exactly. The way that they're behaving now is totally unprecedented. I cannot wait for Trump to have Jake Tapper arrested for disrespecting the government and lying to the people.
This is the USA, not Russia, Venezuela or China, so what you're suggesting is not done for those reasons.
Jeez, kid, what's up witchoo?
Then why did the founders specifically lay out a section on Treason in the Constitution? IMO severely underused.
You go find me, specifically, the "section" of the Constitution that lays out the President's authority to arrest a Jake Tapper or any other news-person on the grounds of Treason for "disrespecting the government and lying to the people".
It's been found by the courts. Ever heard of the phrase "you can't yell FIRE in a crowded theater". No, that specific phrase isn't in the Constitution, it was written by Oliver Wendell Holmes in the case "Schenk Vs United States".
Here's the full quote: "The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic. The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent."
Jake Tapper is and his lies are a clear and present danger to America. President Trump has called the media what it is, the "Enemy of the American People". He was setting the groundwork. When the time is right he will punish all of them.
-
No offense Lou22 but I doubt that it meets the threshold such that any prosecutor would take on the case. Especially when the remedy is so easy: just don't call on him.
-
Plus...show me where the Holmes Standard has ever been applied in recent times against the plethora of people screaming worse than "fire!" in a theater (hint - death threats on socialist media for example are legion!)...it may be the standard but progressive prosecutors are ignoring it and the rest are chickensh*ts. So, legal precedents can and are being ignored. But, any imagined triggering of proglodyte tribes gets headline treatment and calls for free speech to be applied in the manner of fascist and communist thugs.
I've been trying to explain that corruption and treason this widespread and rampant has contaminated pretty much every institution in the land and most of the people populating them...and like the RINO/AINO cowards we've had to suffer under for too damn long who NEVER find a hill worth dying on...relying on the System to fix the System is DOA, it is the fantasy solution of the brain-dead. The cancer must be physically removed, there is no other treatment option that will succeed.
http://ETA - As if on cue, another perfect example -
https://itsaboutliberty.com/index.php/topic,17067.new.html#new (https://itsaboutliberty.com/index.php/topic,17067.new.html#new)
-
Plus...show me where the Holmes Standard has ever been applied in recent times against the plethora of people screaming worse than "fire!" in a theater (hint - death threats on socialist media for example are legion!)...it may be the standard but progressive prosecutors are ignoring it and the rest are chickensh*ts. So, legal precedents can and are being ignored. But, any imagined triggering of proglodyte tribes gets headline treatment and calls for free speech to be applied in the manner of fascist and communist thugs.
I've been trying to explain that corruption and treason this widespread and rampant has contaminated pretty much every institution in the land and most of the people populating them...and like the RINO/AINO cowards we've had to suffer under for too damn long who NEVER find a hill worth dying on...relying on the System to fix the System is DOA, it is the fantasy solution of the brain-dead. The cancer must be physically removed, there is no other treatment option that will succeed.
http://ETA - As if on cue, another perfect example -
https://itsaboutliberty.com/index.php/topic,17067.new.html#new (https://itsaboutliberty.com/index.php/topic,17067.new.html#new)
I totally agree that the media swine have been let off the hook by dem-prog-GOPe leadership. That's why we elected Trump. To do things the others WOULDN'T DO.
Drain the swamp. The political swamp, the media swamp, the cultural swamp. All of it. And if you're saying "we can't do it because it hasn't been done before!" then buddy you haven't been paying attention to how this administration does business!
-
Plus...show me where the Holmes Standard has ever been applied in recent times against the plethora of people screaming worse than "fire!" in a theater (hint - death threats on socialist media for example are legion!)...it may be the standard but progressive prosecutors are ignoring it and the rest are chickensh*ts. So, legal precedents can and are being ignored. But, any imagined triggering of proglodyte tribes gets headline treatment and calls for free speech to be applied in the manner of fascist and communist thugs.
I've been trying to explain that corruption and treason this widespread and rampant has contaminated pretty much every institution in the land and most of the people populating them...and like the RINO/AINO cowards we've had to suffer under for too damn long who NEVER find a hill worth dying on...relying on the System to fix the System is DOA, it is the fantasy solution of the brain-dead. The cancer must be physically removed, there is no other treatment option that will succeed.
http://ETA - As if on cue, another perfect example -
https://itsaboutliberty.com/index.php/topic,17067.new.html#new (https://itsaboutliberty.com/index.php/topic,17067.new.html#new)
I totally agree that the media swine have been let off the hook by dem-prog-GOPe leadership. That's why we elected Trump. To do things the others WOULDN'T DO.
Drain the swamp. The political swamp, the media swamp, the cultural swamp. All of it. And if you're saying "we can't do it because it hasn't been done before!" then buddy you haven't been paying attention to how this administration does business!
I've been pleading and waiting...and continue to do so...
foottapping
-
He's already threatening SNL with an FCC investigation if they choose to continue to lie and prop up anti-American propaganda. That's fair warning in my opinion. If the media straightens itself out then fine, if not, then it will be their own fault for not listening when Trump warned them to stop.
-
He's already threatening SNL with an FCC investigation if they choose to continue to lie and prop up anti-American propaganda. That's fair warning in my opinion. If the media straightens itself out then fine, if not, then it will be their own fault for not listening when Trump warned them to stop.
::hysterical::
Thanks, I needed a chuckle this morning!
-
(https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2021af41908db6d921816e3d1bed96d641d3f90ef6f601b132ba559d1a6de189.jpg)
(https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d7724920956baa19af573a6da0e7e092fd3ba7fb986caf24506ac75212dbee43.jpg)
H/T - WZ
And that's what needs to end!
-
PMSNBC needs a giant feminine napkin, stat!
https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kyle-drennen/2019/04/29/morning-joe-compares-trump-isis-blood-spilled-your-hands (https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/kyle-drennen/2019/04/29/morning-joe-compares-trump-isis-blood-spilled-your-hands)
Hush little beta!
(https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/670424b16c179d51a308a1b903293eef487efd9749f4c06af00a2de6fa8e5aea.jpg)
Does Minka know?