(https://teamlegionnaire.files.wordpress.com/2019/03/mueller.png)
Have you read my, uhm . . . findings?
(has anyone seen my dick??)
Demonrats crapping themselves...plan to subpoena DOJ for the report and Mueller to testify...
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ag-barr-aims-to-release-mueller-report-top-line-conclusions-saturday-night-wont-parse-words-play-games (https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ag-barr-aims-to-release-mueller-report-top-line-conclusions-saturday-night-wont-parse-words-play-games)
Eat a big flaming bag Dem's...DOJ doesn't have to release the full report...go after Mueller...it'll be a big family reunion for y'all and that's it.
Demonrats crapping themselves...plan to subpoena DOJ for the report and Mueller to testify...
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ag-barr-aims-to-release-mueller-report-top-line-conclusions-saturday-night-wont-parse-words-play-games (https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ag-barr-aims-to-release-mueller-report-top-line-conclusions-saturday-night-wont-parse-words-play-games)
Eat a big flaming bag Dem's...DOJ doesn't have to release the full report...go after Mueller...it'll be a big family reunion for y'all and that's it.
I would bet he tells them to read the report.
"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on."
- Winston Churchill
Now it's Trumps turn at bat.
I never heard the term "stallion stuffer" before. ::hysterical::
Lol, ain't it wonderful.....now we need a Special Council to investigate the Clinton Foundation, etc.
Maybe one to investigate congressional collusion in the election, and other non illusionary crimes,
like bribery, etc. (playing with little boys too..)
Lol, ain't it wonderful.....now we need a Special Council to investigate the Clinton Foundation, etc.
Maybe one to investigate congressional collusion in the election, and other non illusionary crimes,
like bribery, etc. (playing with little boys too..)
If Trump or Melania had received $500K for a speech would the Dems consider that evidence collusion? What if that speech was followed by a specific favor to the Russians, like Uranium One?
(https://apologeticsworkshop.files.wordpress.com/2019/03/media-fever-3.png)
Too much like voting for "my favorite bowel movement"...
Too much like voting for "my favorite bowel movement"...
You owe me a keyboard. ::hysterical::
"I think spying on a political campaign is a big deal - it's a big deal."
~ Attorney General William Barr
I'd be willing to forego the length & expense of any further investigation . . . provided enuf rope is purchased to hang everyone from Obama down to Strzok, their bodies set ablaze & left to burn until the ropes break.As Creepy Uncle Joe would say, "This is a big f*cking deal!"
Barr says he Thinks Spying Occurred on 2016 Trump Campaign (http://news.trust.org/item/20190410144125-laelo)Quote"I think spying on a political campaign is a big deal - it's a big deal."
~ Attorney General William Barr
Nasty Pelosi is foaming at the mouth...calling Barr names...
Nasty Pelosi is foaming at the mouth...calling Barr names...
Yeah - heard her on the radio - was wondering what all the fuss was about - thought maybe Barr had called for the murder of just-born babies whom doctors had failed to abort, or was promoting a culture where men put their penises into other men’s anuses & call it “marriage”, OR was pretending that the planet’s heating up & calling for random taxation to “combat” same . . .
. . . she kept squawking & I remember having the thought “Somebody gag that b*tch, bag her & toss her down a well somewhere, so she’ll STFU.”
Nasty Pelosi is foaming at the mouth...calling Barr names...
Yeah - heard her on the radio - was wondering what all the fuss was about - thought maybe Barr had called for the murder of just-born babies whom doctors had failed to abort, or was promoting a culture where men put their penises into other men’s anuses & call it “marriage”, OR was pretending that the planet’s heating up & calling for random taxation to “combat” same . . .
. . . she kept squawking & I remember having the thought “Somebody gag that b*tch, bag her & toss her down a well somewhere, so she’ll STFU.”
I'm good with that. Hope it's a deep one. ::whoohoo::
Nasty Pelosi is foaming at the mouth...calling Barr names...
Yeah - heard her on the radio - was wondering what all the fuss was about - thought maybe Barr had called for the murder of just-born babies whom doctors had failed to abort, or was promoting a culture where men put their penises into other men’s anuses & call it “marriage”, OR was pretending that the planet’s heating up & calling for random taxation to “combat” same . . .
. . . she kept squawking & I remember having the thought “Somebody gag that b*tch, bag her & toss her down a well somewhere, so she’ll STFU.”
I'm good with that. Hope it's a deep one. ::whoohoo::
I think someone "protesteth too much", which is an indication that those who in fact are squeeling like stuck pigs, are soon to be
implicated. I am betting stores around Capitol Hill are selling out of Depends. ::hysterical::
My opinion (and I have no hard evidence to support this contention) is that this would have occurred regardless of who the pubbie nominee was. The State (such as it was) had its mission parameters which were focused on placing a huge thumb on the scale in favor of the hildebeast.
It just would have been simpler - and likely more successful - if it had been Yeb or one of the other losers.
"And I would have gotten away with it if it hadn't been for that pesky Trump!"
"Are a row of heads on pikes too much to ask for?!"
::laughonfloor::
"Are a row of heads on pikes too much to ask for?!"
::laughonfloor::
That would be totally worthy of a happy dance.
Heard just yesterday by a local politician:
"Y'know, wherever I go, people ask me why we hear words like "bitch', 'effing whore' & 'cvnt' used in association with Hirono."
So, was Holder "“protecting documents he was prohibited by law from producing.”?
There definately is no "Constitutional Crisis". Under the rules, If the whole house agrees to the Contempt Resolution there
can only be one thing they can do... they must refer the resolution to the US Attorney for the District of Columbia (who happens
to work for Barr and Trump, funny that huh?) who will most likely put it away in a file cabinet. The SC has ruled that Congress may
not compell a member of the executive to take an action against another member of the executive. These contemp citations are
political clap trap.
There definately is no "Constitutional Crisis". Under the rules, If the whole house agrees to the Contempt Resolution there
can only be one thing they can do... they must refer the resolution to the US Attorney for the District of Columbia (who happens
to work for Barr and Trump, funny that huh?) who will most likely put it away in a file cabinet. The SC has ruled that Congress may
not compell a member of the executive to take an action against another member of the executive. These contemp citations are
political clap trap.
Of course it's not!! They need a new word they can all repeat for a couple of days. They need to be grabbed by the scruff of the neck and just tossed into on coming traffic.
There definately is no "Constitutional Crisis". Under the rules, If the whole house agrees to the Contempt Resolution there
can only be one thing they can do... they must refer the resolution to the US Attorney for the District of Columbia (who happens
to work for Barr and Trump, funny that huh?) who will most likely put it away in a file cabinet. The SC has ruled that Congress may
not compell a member of the executive to take an action against another member of the executive. These contemp citations are
political clap trap.
Of course it's not!! They need a new word they can all repeat for a couple of days. They need to be grabbed by the scruff of the neck and just tossed into on coming traffic.
And then backed up over .......... thumpthump, thumpthump ........
And then backed up over .......... thumpthump, thumpthump ........
From Drudge:
MUELLER RETIRES
CLOSES OFFICE
CHARGING TRUMP 'NOT OPTION'
https://www.c-span.org/video/?461196-1/special-counsel-robert-mueller-doj-policy-prohibited-indictment-president (https://www.c-span.org/video/?461196-1/special-counsel-robert-mueller-doj-policy-prohibited-indictment-president)
...it is hard to see any way out of this that doesn't involve blood.
Quote...it is hard to see any way out of this that doesn't involve blood.
You say that like it's a bad thing ;'}
I was having a conversation with a leftie yesterday about the latest sordid chapter of the Trump witch hunt. Not to worry - I had no expectation of anything other than shyt coming out of his noggin (and I wasn't disappointed). My experiment was to see if there was even a glowing ember of humanity left (there wasn't).
The thrust of my assertion was that the investigation (such as it was) is over and now it is time to get (back) to work.
His response confirmed everything I suspected - an abject denial that anything had changed or that the witch hunt was (or should be) concluded. He upped the ante with an absurd tu quoque (you do it too) as a lame pretext at justification.
I replied that in my opinion Øbama was the worst president in our history, that he trampled laws and conventions in ways that are only now coming to light, and that he committed several offenses that were arguably impeachment worthy. But the difference was that I didn't call (or agitate) for his impeachment because I was smart enough to recognize that tactic as a political solution in the guise of a legal solution. Any political solution requires consensus to succeed. Sure, we could have gone forward with an impeachment against Øbama (he rolls his eyes at the thought) but it would have gone nowhere.
(OK, so I've handed him the edge - now let's see if he can be pragmatic and rational)
Nope, he seizes on the tactical advantage at the expense of the strategic one. He goes for the shiny object (admission that an Øbama impeachment would fail) as a concession that my statement somehow absolves Øbama of any blame or complicity while leaving the door wide open for persecution of Trump. He does so at the expense of any reasonable attempt at objectivity (not that he would ever notice or care).
Thus ends the rational part of the discussion.
Recognizing that this discussion has zero possibility of success, I fall back to my (now) default position.
"You people (I love using that phrase!) have worked yourself up into an emotional state where you are incapable of seeing reality. You are obsessed with demonizing our president and are willing to do anything - however foolish or dangerous - in pursuit of that false premise. In that sense you are like the dog chasing the car - you have no idea what you would do if you caught it. I'm here to tell you that what lies next will be bloody and painful. Even if you win you will surely lose."
"Proceed carefully as if your very life depended on it."
Him: "I don't want to talk anymore about this."
She won before this judge once and I believe she will again, then Trump should hire her
She won before this judge once and I believe she will again, then Trump should hire her
You should see the hoops and denials she went thru in her book. She won't stop.She won before this judge once and I believe she will again, then Trump should hire her
Seriously...how many times do the Praetorians get to keep arguing? Seems to me the judge is performing Tibetan contortions for these clowns that only the best monks can duplicate!
Maybe I can see a clerical mistake at the outset. Maybe. But to not discover it for two years? No way. The DOJ had to cover it up for two years. Now what do they say to the judge? We are not dishonest just incompetent?
Some of the commentary suggested that the 'error' was actually fraud in that this assignment of authors works out better for the DOJ but that is a stretch for me as the handwriting could be IDed pretty quickly.
Maybe I can see a clerical mistake at the outset. Maybe. But to not discover it for two years? No way. The DOJ had to cover it up for two years. Now what do they say to the judge? We are not dishonest just incompetent?
Some of the commentary suggested that the 'error' was actually fraud in that this assignment of authors works out better for the DOJ but that is a stretch for me as the handwriting could be IDed pretty quickly.
I'll take dishonest for 500.
https://saraacarter.com/flynns-attorney-files-brief-to-dismiss-case-for-egregious-government-misconduct/
She doesn't let up, ever. ::thumbsup::
And the rogue gutless Obamian Judge in the Stone case...the nefarious Berman-Jackson...is playing games with sentencing...will ignore the tainted jury foreman and issue her sentence and then postpone execution of the sentence while she finds a way to wiggle out of the foreman issue without scrapping her entire abomination of a kangaroo trial! (https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/02/18/judicial-shenanigans-stone-judge-will-deliver-sentence-then-immediately-postpone-execution-of-sentence/)
Effing statist puke!
https://saraacarter.com/flynns-attorney-files-brief-to-dismiss-case-for-egregious-government-misconduct/
She doesn't let up, ever. ::thumbsup::
And the rogue gutless Obamian Judge in the Stone case...the nefarious Berman-Jackson...is playing games with sentencing...will ignore the tainted jury foreman and issue her sentence and then postpone execution of the sentence while she finds a way to wiggle out of the foreman issue without scrapping her entire abomination of a kangaroo trial! (https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/02/18/judicial-shenanigans-stone-judge-will-deliver-sentence-then-immediately-postpone-execution-of-sentence/)
Effing statist puke!
The judge knows that he's up sh*ts creek she can go ahead and sentence him all she wants but nothing is going to happen with it TILL this other stuff is dealt with. She can let it go to another judge on appeal or grant a new trail or declare a mistrial and its over. If the government really really wants him the go for retrial and spend all that money all over again BUT the prosecutors all resigned.
She has no clear way out anything she does is going to come apart the only thing that won't is a mistrial and she comes out looking like a a fair judge anything else and she's a partisan hack.
%$#@ing Obama's KGB!
https://tennesseestar.com/2020/02/21/k-t-mcfarland-says-mueller-interrogators-put-her-through-hell-and-left-her-traumatized/
These rogue DeepState low-life's all deserve a traitor's fate!!!
%$#@ing Obama's KGB!
https://tennesseestar.com/2020/02/21/k-t-mcfarland-says-mueller-interrogators-put-her-through-hell-and-left-her-traumatized/ (https://tennesseestar.com/2020/02/21/k-t-mcfarland-says-mueller-interrogators-put-her-through-hell-and-left-her-traumatized/)
These rogue DeepState low-life's all deserve a traitor's fate!!!
I can't read any of these without thinking, "Why the hell didn't she tell the witch hunters to F the F off and lawyer up? There was precisely a 0.000% chance that mueller would be impartial.
OK, I have to add something because I read more including that she did get lawyered up. IMO anyone who was subjected to the mueller witch hunt should be eligible for 100% recompense for time and trouble. Anyone who was charged with anything should automatically walk.
And anyone who served on the witch hunt team should receive the same sentence as the worst encountered by their victims.
...as a starting point
Yeah...he must be going through manapause...
Yeah...he must be going through manapause...
It's the hair dye.
Article III Section 1 is pretty clear cut that they serve in "good Behavior" for as long as they are able to...I think a Constitutional Amendment would be required...but the middle part of Section 2 of Article II makes me wonder if some meddling is possible through legislation for the "inferior" courts which everything below Supreme is considered.
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript (https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript)
Article III Section 1 is pretty clear cut that they serve in "good Behavior" for as long as they are able to...I think a Constitutional Amendment would be required...but the middle part of Section 2 of Article II makes me wonder if some meddling is possible through legislation for the "inferior" courts which everything below Supreme is considered.
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript (https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript)
I was thinking it's an area where we would most likely amend the Constitution, like Terms not exceed 12 years. I would be a good time to repeal the 17th amendment at the same time.
If all that happens here is a filthycrat law firm goes under and the rats flee to another hole it will be more impetus towards BITS!
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/04/28/former-flynn-counsel-finds-6800-new-pages-of-evidence-not-turned-over-judge-sullivan-is-not-amused/
Traitors gotta die...one way or another! ;)
If all that happens here is a filthycrat law firm goes under and the rats flee to another hole it will be more impetus towards BITS!
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/04/28/former-flynn-counsel-finds-6800-new-pages-of-evidence-not-turned-over-judge-sullivan-is-not-amused/
Traitors gotta die...one way or another! ;)
That firm is in bed with the govt much of the time. I believe they only gave Flynn a half hearted defense to avoid displeasing the govt. They opened themselves up to a lawsuit from Flynn with this.
If all that happens here is a filthycrat law firm goes under and the rats flee to another hole it will be more impetus towards BITS!
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/04/28/former-flynn-counsel-finds-6800-new-pages-of-evidence-not-turned-over-judge-sullivan-is-not-amused/
Traitors gotta die...one way or another! ;)
That firm is in bed with the govt much of the time. I believe they only gave Flynn a half hearted defense to avoid displeasing the govt. They opened themselves up to a lawsuit from Flynn with this.
Hang 'em all!
::noose::
If all that happens here is a filthycrat law firm goes under and the rats flee to another hole it will be more impetus towards BITS!
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/04/28/former-flynn-counsel-finds-6800-new-pages-of-evidence-not-turned-over-judge-sullivan-is-not-amused/ (https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/04/28/former-flynn-counsel-finds-6800-new-pages-of-evidence-not-turned-over-judge-sullivan-is-not-amused/)
Traitors gotta die...one way or another! ;)
That firm is in bed with the govt much of the time. I believe they only gave Flynn a half hearted defense to avoid displeasing the govt. They opened themselves up to a lawsuit from Flynn with this.
Hang 'em all!
::noose::
After they refund his money about 2 mil. the law suit has to be done and paid then their licenses to practice law surrendered. Then you can hang them all you want but first things first.
A Writ of Mandamus is an order requiring a public official (an elected or appointed official or in this case a judge) to carry out the duty of their office as the law requires them to do. In this case it would basically order Sullivan to cut the bullsh*t and dismiss the case.
https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1260744037428060161
It's a twitter thread (that can be read without being a twitterer) that explains what can and probably will be done about Sullivan.QuoteA Writ of Mandamus is an order requiring a public official (an elected or appointed official or in this case a judge) to carry out the duty of their office as the law requires them to do. In this case it would basically order Sullivan to cut the bullsh*t and dismiss the case.