It's About Liberty: A Conservative Forum

Topics => Media Bias/Media War => Topic started by: richb on May 15, 2014, 04:25:56 PM

Title: Fired NYT female editor paid less then male editor that proceeded her
Post by: richb on May 15, 2014, 04:25:56 PM

I love, love,  love,  love, when this PC nonsense hits home at hypocritical New York Times.   

Sounds like Jill Abramson found out she was earning far less then the man she replaced. 

Never mind she had far fewer years in at the paper,  had less experience,  and the biggest one yet,  the New York Times just doesn't earn as much as it once did,  so pay has to decrease,  even for those at the top.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/378095/sanctimonious-times-kevin-d-williamson (http://www.nationalreview.com/article/378095/sanctimonious-times-kevin-d-williamson)

Oh,  she has been replaced by the first black to hold that job.   It's unending there isn't it? 

Title: Re: Fired NYT female editor paid less then male editor that proceeded her
Post by: AlanS on May 15, 2014, 09:59:35 PM

The war on women continues, but on the wrong side of the aisle. ::laughonfloor::

Title: Re: Fired NYT female editor paid less then male editor that proceeded her
Post by: Libertas on May 16, 2014, 07:00:17 AM

I read that yesterday and I thought "Why do I care?" because its not like people will put one and one together and get two...

Then I caught some of Rush's show and I hear him talk about this and it sounds like she did get a bump up in pay when she first complained, so something else must have pissed them off...

But regardless, I am back to not caring again...let's all talk about the racist Jew Sterling, yeah, that's something people understand!

/

 ::unknowncomic::