Topic: They want a war

[Weisshaupt]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-administration-to-instruct-schools-to-accommodate-transgender-students/2016/05/12/0ed1c50e-18ab-11e6-aa55-670cabef46e0_story.html

Yep, a mentally ill ( or just predatory) boy  can share your girls locker room - No matter where you live according to this administration.
 My daughter is not going to be subjected to this crap.
He wants to use the girls  room, he can do it after he cuts off his parts -- or someone else does it for him.

Apparently Ann Barnhardt has similar thoughts.

http://www.barnhardt.biz/2016/05/13/the-chesterton-axiom-no-longer-applies/

Note the hyper-effeminate bullsh*t language being spewed here:  Obama Administration FORCES…

BULLsh*t.

Listen up, all ye flaccid effeminates, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS COERCION.  The Obama regime can not FORCE you to do ANYTHING.  You either freely choose to capitulate or not.  This “forced”, “coercion” bullsh*t is 100% candyass agitprop.

You know what the solution to this is? Every parent who LOVES THEIR CHILDREN WITHDRAWS THEIR CHILDREN FROM PUBLIC SCHOOL MONDAY MORNING.

It is non-violent. It is very, very doable.  Workarounds to educating children outside of the public schools abound.

And you know what? No one will do it.  Public schools are now LITERALLY open, unapologetic child sex abuse centers, and no one will do a damn thing about it.

And you want me to fricking bayonet charge a machine gun for this?  You want me to feel some warm, fuzzy feeling about preserving a culture in which not just the oligarchs are criminally insane, but also 99.999% of the civilian population to the point that they will shrug in complete passivity as their government tells them clearly and in no uncertain terms that they must surrender their children to be sexually abused and psychologically tortured into diabolical psychosexual perversion?

I will not fight FOR this.  Never before in human history has there been a population so utterly and completely depraved.  Just as I have advocated for the exterminations of the musloid CULTURE and the black hip-hop CULTURE, and cite the agreement by all morally sane people that the Nazi CULTURE had to be exterminated, so too I now declare that what is now the “american” culture MUST be exterminated.

These cultures must be exterminated so that the human beings inside of them might be saved.

I am still  trying to figure out what Obama's game is here? Do something so utterly offensive that he will deny Hillary any chance of getting elected. They know the whole economy is going down and need Trump to win so they can blame it all on him and the GOP?

Seriously, I doubt this will play well at a ballot box. Or are they just telling us the ballot box doesn't matter?  I wish everyone would just remove their kids, and stop paying taxes, but Ann is right, they won't.  But I won't stand by and watch it happen  either.


 

[Pablo de Fleurs]

#ShotgunsAndBaseballBats

[Pandora]

... one day this past week, I was in the Post Office, in line behind a man wearing women's flats, a bra underneath his shirt (telltale indentations in the shirt-back) and sporting long, sparkly-red painted nails; he had a longer-in-the-back man's haircut, topped off with a man's brimmed hat on top of a very masculine face and your typical man's voice.

Do I want this guy in a ladies bathroom or locker room?  Hell no.  But unless the NC Lege passed HB2, this guy could have claimed (in Charlotte) -- and gotten away with it -- that he had a right to be in there and no woman would have had standing to tell him to get the hell out.

This happened last month, in my town, and I then posted the above on my local forum.

Thanks to the Obama Regime's latest mandate, few facilities owners or of those in authority will be willing to confront this guy, or any like him, for fear of being accused of Civil Rights violations, when he attempts an invasion into Women's facilities.

This cannot stand.

[Pablo de Fleurs]

... one day this past week, I was in the Post Office, in line behind a man wearing women's flats, a bra underneath his shirt (telltale indentations in the shirt-back) and sporting long, sparkly-red painted nails; he had a longer-in-the-back man's haircut, topped off with a man's brimmed hat on top of a very masculine face and your typical man's voice.

Do I want this guy in a ladies bathroom or locker room?  Hell no.  But unless the NC Lege passed HB2, this guy could have claimed (in Charlotte) -- and gotten away with it -- that he had a right to be in there and no woman would have had standing to tell him to get the hell out.

This happened last month, in my town, and I then posted the above on my local forum.

Thanks to the Obama Regime's latest mandate, few facilities owners or of those in authority will be willing to confront this guy, or any like him, for fear of being accused of Civil Rights violations, when he attempts an invasion into Women's facilities.

This cannot stand.

Perhaps not standing...but the ability to forcibly oust him from the rest room (maybe with the help of other women).

I will risk arrest & prosecution if, when out in public, my wife or daughter encounter such an occurrence. Sort of a reverse Rosa Parks move. It's too bad that we couldn't make it a coordinated effort; e.g. @ 12:00 Noon on such a date, people around the nation go in & oust trans-freaks from women's rest rooms.

This is a tipping point. Freaks need to be ousted and, perhaps, officials put six feet under. Wives, daughters & mothers require men (not simply "males") to stand up & act.

[Weisshaupt]

I will risk arrest & prosecution if, when out in public, my wife or daughter encounter such an occurrence. Sort of a reverse Rosa Parks move. It's too bad that we couldn't make it a coordinated effort; e.g. @ 12:00 Noon on such a date, people around the nation go in & oust trans-freaks from women's rest rooms.

This is a tipping point. Freaks need to be ousted and, perhaps, officials put six feet under.

That conversation with TP toilet Paper is typical.  Yes there as already been numerous examples of Heterosexual not-confused-at-all  predators taking advantage of these environments. You have indeed made all women less safe and because you deny the reality of biological sex. And You think WE are on the wrong side of history. You are denying facts that are plain as your own genitalia. No need to bring God into it at all. You are denying the sky is blue, birds have wings, and that boys have a penis.  Because it all depends on what the meaning of "is" is. Go practice your shamanistic word magic elsewhere you caveman.  Just because you call a "boy" a "Girl" will not make it so. Reality doesn't care about your feelings and it will remain a BOY - no mater what sounds you use to denote that.

The problem is we would have trouble finding someone who even tried it with a group of angry people standing there-  transfreak or otherwise.
The Trans people are sick- mentally ill, and their delusions should not be pandered to. They are some insignificant portion of the population anyway , and they ave been using the women's restroom for ages, and normally without issue because the actual women involved in any circumstance CHOOSE not to make it an issue. They pity the poor confused train wreck. 
 
But now Obama is giving activists carte blanche to pretend to be confused, and make "straights" uncomfortable - and to push the issue.  Because that is what Obama does. If he can stick a finger in your eye, he will, because  he hates America and Americans, and pretty much  hates straight, Christian people. Anything that irritates them or increases their cost or risks, he will try to enact.  He is probably hoping we will drag one of these people into the streets and beat the crap out of him  so he can prove we are bigoted..But in the end, he will say that no matter when or how we finally choose to begin violence.  You will have all sots of libtards - straight, or gay -  with no "confusion " what so ever  whose only purpose is to flaunt their new found and federally protected bullying powers, along with a smattering of perverts who will join them  just to get their jollies at your daughter's expense.

What needs to happen are States standing up - passing a law like North Carolina and then - if the Fed withholds education funding, pass laws protecting people's property from seizure if they stop paying taxes to the Fed.  This will then lead to a standoff -- You can bet Texas will be there. You can bet also that Colorado will not do jack - too many libtards here.   But yes, the stupid is so strong here, and there is such potential for this to drive us toward hot and open hostilities,  I have to wonder what else is going on.  Are they trying to distract us from what Obama's other hand is doing? Is it just stupidity and arrogance  causing overreach? Of is the overreach on purpose to cause civil unrest?

This is so bad my mother finally admitted something was wrong, so maybe this is finally the ting that wakes up these idiotic democrat women to the fact that the Democrats don't give a crap about them or their privacy.

[Pablo de Fleurs]

That conversation with TP toilet Paper is typical. 

After awhile, they run/recycle the same argumentation (pseudo-statistical, accusatory) & ultimately end up at ad hominem attack (me, my God, or, LOL, my mother).

If I state facts, they'll say "Oh, you know so much about it, you must be homosexual." Or "There haven't been any negative side effects/reported incidents/examples of abuse, so all this is merely a diversion." OR "That's not very Christian of you", "Christians aren't supposed to judge", etc. blah-blah-blah. Before entering a confrontation, I could write down the top ten responses on a post-it note & be 99% accurate as to their reactions.

The mode I'm in @ the moment (and am generally only a 1/2 step from ever assuming) is direct, frontal assault on their lifestyle/point of view - piss them off with what I know they'll consider "outrageous": such as quoting suicide statistics or the negative effects of anal cancer and/or the final stages of AIDS. Not loving I know...but these militants aren't the ones we're supposed to love (unless love 'em, then kill 'em fits someone's paradigm).

Jesus did not say to love those who seek to kill, maim, assault, rape or pervert your culture and/or family - self, family AND cultural defense are valid, necessary & required.

And, when they accuse me of saying "bad" or "nasty" things...I merely ask them for the metric or ontological reference point for the accusation. Devoid of such an objective frame of reference, they can only resort to pragmatism; their worldview (of which they're ignorant) does not contain the metrics of good & evil or right & wrong. To do that they must smuggle in the Judeo/Christian Worldview...and reminding them of that produces better results/reactions that using the word "a$$hole". 

[Glock32]

... one day this past week, I was in the Post Office, in line behind a man wearing women's flats, a bra underneath his shirt (telltale indentations in the shirt-back) and sporting long, sparkly-red painted nails; he had a longer-in-the-back man's haircut, topped off with a man's brimmed hat on top of a very masculine face and your typical man's voice.

Do I want this guy in a ladies bathroom or locker room?  Hell no.  But unless the NC Lege passed HB2, this guy could have claimed (in Charlotte) -- and gotten away with it -- that he had a right to be in there and no woman would have had standing to tell him to get the hell out.

This happened last month, in my town, and I then posted the above on my local forum.

Thanks to the Obama Regime's latest mandate, few facilities owners or of those in authority will be willing to confront this guy, or any like him, for fear of being accused of Civil Rights violations, when he attempts an invasion into Women's facilities.

This cannot stand.

And to your point, did you hear about the 8 year old girl assaulted, by a grown man, in the women's bathroom at a restaurant in Chicago?  They've now given predators like this a plausible cover story for being in the women's room in the first place.  In sane times, the mere sight of an obvious man walking into a women's bathroom or locker room would have sounded all the alarm bells.  He would be immediately confronted.  More likely than that, he would not even attempt to use it as his hunting ground because of how much attention it would draw.

Oh, not now.  No way.  The Left doesn't care how many eggs they have to crack to make their Social Justice Omelette.

[Pandora]

Yes, I heard.  As I wrote, this cannot be allowed to stand.

I will have no qualms about confronting an intruder.  If the facilities owners don't want to put their businesses at risk by taking proper control, the least they can do is make like "I know nutheenk" and let regular citizens, i.e. normal people, handle it.  Those that think having any guy in the Ladies is just fine and dandy will forfeit my business.

Target, I'm lookin' at you.

[Weisshaupt]

http://www.bookwormroom.com/2016/05/13/sex-and-state-power-whats-behind-obamas-transgender-push/

While the overheated Marxist rhetoric of the 1960s has died away, the Leftist preoccupation with childhood sexuality, and its relentless desire to have the state control a child’s sexual development — and, by extension, to deny the child self-ownership — is still alive and well. The primary pathway the Left currently uses to decouple childhood sexual development from self-individuation is the gay rights agenda.

Many of us who believe that gays and lesbians should be free to pursue their personal lives free from discrimination have felt bewildered by our discomfort with and resistance to all of the homophilic programs that have suddenly invaded our children’s schools. To use the language of the Left, though, we should “listen to our feelings.”

Subconsciously, we recognize that these pro-homosexual programs have nothing to do with teaching tolerance, which is a virtue in a pluralistic society. Instead, the programs have everything to do with having the state substitute its goal of sexual, and therefore social, control in place of a parent’s desire to inculcate his children with traditional Judeo-Christian values, values that focus on the inviolability of the individual, beginning with his body.

Examples abound of supposedly anti-discriminatory programs that, instead of focusing on tolerance, work to direct a child’s sexual development away from the zone of privacy that is a hallmark of Western sexuality. Robin of Berkeley describes a group called “Gender Spectrum,” which has the ostensible goal of allowing “transgender, gender bending, [and] gender nonconforming” children and teens to hang with each other and share their experiences. She rightly sees this not as an effort to promote tolerance, but as a way to make it “cool to dabble in polyamory and gender nonconformism,” thereby “destroy[ing] the West by degrading traditional values.”....

 Last year, a vigilant blogger exposed the fact that Kevin Jennings, Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar,” as part of his leadership role in the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (“GLSEN”), aggressively promoted child pornography in the classroom. GLSEN’s actions had nothing to do with creating a safe, non-discriminatory environment for young people with different sexual orientations and everything to do with using the government (i.e., public schools) to inculcate in children the notion that their bodies have no boundaries. A body with no boundaries, of course, is a body that can easily be decoupled from the individual’s control and then ceded to the state.

Sort of the opposite of Ann's argument that Homosexuality is a result of Diabolic Narcissism and concentration on self. But I can see somet truth in both and I am not sure how to integrate them Why are these Beta variety Diabolical Narcissists so intent on giving themselves into the control of an Alpha? Ann's idea is they they are trying to swim upstream socially - that the Alpha is an even more successful narcissist that they wish to emulate.. and of course many of these Alphas are in positions of governmental power.  But it doesn't really explain this desire to make  children into little followers - oter than to perhaps give the Beta  Narcissist a class to feel superior to?  That they want to sexualize children and set them on pats that will lead them to unhappy ends is certain,  I am just not certain how this results in Diabolical Narcissism almost each and every time. Because it makes the child loathe themselves because they have been tainted by these evil adults? I am just not cetain how the two are linked , but I am almost certain they are.

But maybe its simple:

https://youtu.be/v7NYWd7p-zE

This guy was a tranny and he felt that he was pursueing a false self - which is really what a narcissist does -- project a false self to themselves and the world because they loathe themselves..



.

[Glock32]

And, when they accuse me of saying "bad" or "nasty" things...I merely ask them for the metric or ontological reference point for the accusation. Devoid of such an objective frame of reference, they can only resort to pragmatism; their worldview (of which they're ignorant) does not contain the metrics of good & evil or right & wrong. To do that they must smuggle in the Judeo/Christian Worldview...and reminding them of that produces better results/reactions that using the word "a$$hole". 

I like making this point as well when dealing with the "secular humanists."  They think they can throw out religion, pretend man has no immortal soul, yet keep all the pleasant and civilization-maintaining trappings.  Without an author of the universe, an ultimate arbiter of right and wrong, truth and falsehood, there can be no genuine morality.  Even in highly secularized Western countries, they are still coasting on the momentum of their Christian origins, with so much of Christian morality baked into the cake, so to speak.

They're playing with fire -- in the worst sense of the word possible.

[Pablo de Fleurs]

I like making this point as well when dealing with the "secular humanists." 

You'll appreciate this: Richard Dawkins (eternal atheist) & Ravi Zacharias (apologetics rock-star) often spar.

“The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.”
--Richard Dawkins

"Fiction? Yet you do not believe in God...so, within the course of human events, who or whom have done these things?"
--Ravi Zacharias

Uhm...Richard...and I hate to break it to you...but within your atheistic framework...the correct answer is..."man".

[ToddF]

I'll mention your "Sky God" because I'm a virtue signaling atheist moron who can't make an intelligent case for letting men into little girls showers and changing rooms.

[John Florida]

  I see it as a way to circle back to a civil rights argument just like Jim Crow and the marches of the 60s and another way to show how bigoted the right is. It's the same bullsh*t as the war on women and gay rights.  Last election it was the war on women as a way to fire up the base and try to find a way to get out the vote since their voters don't seem that interested in Hillery and are expressing it by supporting Bernie which as I see it  isn't so much support for a socialist but rather a vote against the witch.

    Where is the fat old white guy argument that they made last time?? Why is Bernie always being describes as the 70 year old socialist from Vermont?  Why isn't he the democratic socialist from Vermont??  Why isn't she the old white woman carpet bagger from N.Y. ?

   Trump is going to win in a land slide not because of the votes he gets but rather for the votes the dems won't cast they're going to stay home the end and they can see it coming.

[Pandora]

This will adversely affect women's college sports programs, too, of course.

[Glock32]

JF is right, this whole issue was planned from the beginning just like Stephanopoulos blindsiding Romney with that birth control question, which sparked the "War on Women" bullsh*t.

I think they've overreached, especially with His Imperial Highness issuing those school bathroom orders on Friday.

[Pablo de Fleurs]

JF is right, this whole issue was planned from the beginning just like Stephanopoulos blindsiding Romney with that birth control question, which sparked the "War on Women" bullsh*t.

I think they've overreached, especially with His Imperial Highness issuing those school bathroom orders on Friday.

They have. If not rescinded there WILL be violence & bloodshed over this one. Patriots AND tyrants will die. Guaranteed.

#WaterTheTree

[Libertas]

Seriously, I don't think they care if there is violence over this...I think they welcome it, they want to relive the glory days of civil rights struggles,  but they don't want the attendant morals and ethics that go with it, as previously discussed they hijacked Judeo-Christian language but not its essential meaning...they can say this is about civil rights, but it is not...nobody is denying a self-identifying person entry into a bathroom, they are merely saying that person cannot choose which one they should enter arbitrarily...if a man dressing as a woman wants to enter the ladies room there is only one way for that to happen...he has to lose his dick!  I think perhaps a group of angry ladies should perform that procedure when given the opportunity...I bet it would work wonders for sorting this issue out like no other option.

[Weisshaupt]

This is what the Obama administration nudged the rest of the country toward Friday. Yes, the thought of male genitalia in girls’ locker rooms – and vice versa – might be distressing to some. But the battle for equality has always been in part about overcoming discomfort – with blacks sharing facilities, with gays sharing marriage – then realizing that it was not nearly so awful as some people imagined.

So why can't we expect those who are uncomfortable with the bodies God gave them  get over their discomfort and use the correct restroom  instead of expecting everyone to pander to their delusion.  And do we vote on this? No  you pretend "sex" in Title IX means whatever sex you think you are instead of whatever genitalia you were born with. I can guarantee you that when congress passed the law it meant the latter.  But yes, but all  means try to push this on others at government gunpoint and then we will see if you can get over the discomfort caused by outraged citizens beating a man who enters a womans' rest room to death in the streets.

Yes. They want violence over this. Any violence that does occur will  be hailed as proof they needed to do impose this, not as proof that people don't like being bullied when it comes to the safety of their wives and children.  It would almost be worth the jail time to give them the example of violence on females  they say doesn't exist , but I suspect one of Obama's imported Barbarian Muslims who think they have a right to rape western women will prove that soon enough.
But remember the US has a rape culture and  men are all potential rapists, so its obvious Men need access to women's bathrooms, locker rooms and changing areas.

[Libertas]

As usual, Texas leads the way -

“This will be the end of public education, if this prevails,” Patrick said. “People will pull their kids out, homeschooling will explode, private schools will increase.”
http://iotwreport.com/texas-to-obama-we-wont-comply/#ym7M2xXZkh0k8Q4Y.99

 

[Glock32]

From the article Weisshaupt linked:  "This is what the Obama administration nudged the rest of the country toward Friday."

Notice the typical dissembling language -- "nudged."  They aren't "nudging" sh*t.  They're making sweeping demands and the price of refusal is the funding that the states were deliberately made dependent upon.  It's like a pimp getting his brood of women addicted to drugs, and using that as part of his leverage over them.  Insult to injury is the fact that this money comes from the states in the first place.

It's well past time for this and several other issues to be forced.  The time of acquiescence is over.  If we comply, we lose something far bigger than federal funds.  Let them cut off their funds.  Let them send their armed goons to force compliance from governors and school superintendents and principals and teachers and parents.

When naked tyranny is their design, the first meaningful counterattack is to make them show themselves for what they are.