It's About Liberty: A Conservative Forum

Topics => Entertainment => Topic started by: Pablo de Fleurs on December 18, 2013, 02:04:08 PM

Title: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Pablo de Fleurs on December 18, 2013, 02:04:08 PM
‘Duck Dynasty’ Star: A Vagina Is ‘More Desirable Than A Man’s Anus’
December 18, 2013 10:18 AM
http://houston.cbslocal.com/2013/12/18/duck-dynasty-star-a-vagina-is-more-desirable-than-a-mans-anus/ (http://houston.cbslocal.com/2013/12/18/duck-dynasty-star-a-vagina-is-more-desirable-than-a-mans-anus/)

WEST MONROE, La. (CBS Houston) — One “Duck Dynasty” star called homosexuality illogical.

Phil Robertson, one of the stars of the A&E reality show and founder of Duck Commander, made the comments in a recent interview with GQ.
(http://cbshouston.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/phil-robertson.jpg?w=300)
“It seems like, to me, a vagina – as a man – would be more desirable than a man’s anus. That’s just me,” Robertson stated. “I’m just thinking: There’s more there! She’s got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what I’m saying? But hey, sin: It’s not logical, my man. It’s just not logical.”

Robertson described in the interview how sin is becoming acceptable in America and that the country needs to turn back to its Christian values.

“Start with homosexual behavior and just morph out from there. Bestiality, sleeping around with this woman and that woman and that woman and those men,” Robertson told GQ. “Don’t be deceived. Neither the adulterers, the idolaters, the male prostitutes, the homosexual offenders, the greedy, the drunkards, the slanderers, the swindlers—they won’t inherit the kingdom of God. Don’t deceive yourself. It’s not right.” (1 Corinthians 6:9-10 - as reference).

The patriarch of the Robertson family said just putting one’s faith in Jesus will help problems be solved.

““If you simply put your faith in Jesus coming down in flesh, through a human being, God becoming flesh living on the earth, dying on the cross for the sins of the world, being buried, and being raised from the dead—yours and mine and everybody else’s problems will be solved. And the next time we see you, we will say: ‘You are now a brother. Our brother.’ So then we look at you totally different then,” Robertson said.

Despite his beliefs, the 67-year-old says he doesn’t judge others.

“We never, ever judge someone on who’s going to heaven, hell. That’s the Almighty’s job,” Robertson told GQ. “We just love ‘em, give ‘em the good news about Jesus – whether they’re homosexuals, drunks, terrorists. We let God sort ‘em out later.”

GLAAD slammed Robertson’s comments, calling them “vile.” [Me: as opposed to what...your 'Choc-O-Dile' fetish?]

“Phil and his family claim to be Christian, but Phil’s lies about an entire community fly in the face of what true Christians believe,” GLAAD spokesperson Wilson Cruz said in a statement. “He clearly knows nothing about gay people or the majority of Louisianans – and Americans – who support legal recognition for loving and committed gay and lesbian couples. Phil’s decision to push vile and extreme stereotypes is a stain on A&E and his sponsors who now need to reexamine their ties to someone with such public disdain for LGBT people and families.”

Robertson also revealed in the interview he only sees the family doing the popular show for another five years.

“Let’s face it. Three, four, five years, we’re out of here,” Robertson told GQ. “You know what I’m saying? It’s a TV show. This thing ain’t gonna last forever. No way.”

“Duck Dynasty” has been a ratings juggernaut for A&E, averaging 14 million viewers an episode. The latest “Duck Dynasty” season begins Jan. 15.
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: IronDioPriest on December 18, 2013, 02:18:51 PM
‘Duck Dynasty’ Star: A Vagina Is ‘More Desirable Than A Man’s Anus’

Heterosexual men and lesbians everywhere agree.
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Predator Don on December 18, 2013, 02:51:43 PM
The difference between Phil Robertson and a politician who calls themselves Christians...... Robertson doesn't give a flying rats butt what GLAAD thinks, he knows what the Bible teaches. A politician?  Never lean on their faith, always lean on man.
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Pablo de Fleurs on December 18, 2013, 02:59:53 PM
I was reading & listening to my You.Version devotional this AM & read on beyond the earmarked chapter for today:

Genesis 7:13-16 | New King James Version (NKJV)

13 On the very same day Noah and Noah’s sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth, and Noah’s wife and the three wives of his sons with them, entered the ark— 14 they and every beast after its kind, all cattle after their kind, every creeping thing that creeps on the earth after its kind, and every bird after its kind, every bird of every sort. 15 And they went into the ark to Noah, two by two, of all flesh in which is the breath of life. 16 So those that entered, male and female of all flesh, went in as God had commanded him; and the Lord shut him in.

All homos not able to swim continuously for 40 days & nights, uhm...drowned.

(Now that's what I call natural selection!)

Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: ToddF on December 18, 2013, 03:28:27 PM
I just don't see Duck Dynasty in GQ, for some reason.  It's not like they're there to share Brazilian Waxing secrets with the "men" who normally read GQ.
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: oldcoastie6468 on December 18, 2013, 03:35:27 PM
‘Duck Dynasty’ Star: A Vagina Is ‘More Desirable Than A Man’s Anus’

And prettier, too!  ::exitstageleft::
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: trapeze on December 18, 2013, 10:08:07 PM
And now A&E has taken him off of the show...headline (http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/duck-dynastys-phil-robertson-indefinite-666808) at Drudge.

Ironically and coincidentally, Drudge has this article (http://blog.al.com/breaking/2013/12/live-blogging_todays_huntsvill.html) posted just a few lines below the headline.

Quote
State prosecutors say they are "confident and satisfied" that Carl Philip Herold, accused of holding a child captive, sexually torturing him and producing child pornography of the torture, will show up for trial after a judge here raised Herold's bond to $1 million cash today.

Herold spoke to reporters outside the district courtroom saying, "I love and miss my son very much" and disputing a police investigator's testimony describing a trip Herold took to Disney World with the boy as at least in part about sex.

....

Herold, 32, faces charges of producing child pornography, distributing child pornography, allowing his child to be depicted in pornography, sodomy, sexual abuse and aggravated child abuse. He is in the Madison County Jail and was before District Judge Alison Austin today on the state's bond increase petition.

Austin issued a similar order Monday raising to $1 million the bond against Charles Dunnavant, identified as Herold's domestic partner and suspected partner in the alleged crimes. Dunnavant faces charges including sexual torture, sodomy, aggravated child abuse and transmitting or exposing a person to a STD.

They don't reproduce so they have to recruit.
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Libertas on December 19, 2013, 07:11:33 AM
Reminds me of Team America...

Assholes?  Who want's shyt all over them?

Re: Phil - Heard clips on the radio, priceless...his steady unwavering soft-spoken matter-of-fact manner...

 ::thumbsup::
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Pablo de Fleurs on December 19, 2013, 11:49:48 AM
@tedcruz
As PC enforcers often forget, tolerance is a two-way street: facebook.com/tedcruzpage/po… #PhilRobertson

https://m.facebook.com/tedcruzpage/posts/10152129834967464 (https://m.facebook.com/tedcruzpage/posts/10152129834967464)

Ted Cruz | Free Speech Matters

The reason that so many Americans love Duck Dynasty is because it represents the America usually ignored or mocked by liberal elites: a family that loves and cares for each other, believes in God, and speaks openly about their faith.

If you believe in free speech or religious liberty, you should be deeply dismayed over the treatment of Phil Robertson. Phil expressed his personal views and his own religious faith; for that, he was suspended from his job. In a free society, anyone is free to disagree with him--but the mainstream media should not behave as the thought police censoring the views with which they disagree.

And, as PC enforcers often forget, tolerance is a two-way street. Here's what Phil himself had to say about accepting and loving everybody:

“I myself am a product of the 60s; I centered my life around sex, drugs and rock and roll until I hit rock bottom and accepted Jesus as my Savior. My mission today is to go forth and tell people about why I follow Christ and also what the bible teaches, and part of that teaching is that women and men are meant to be together. However, I would never treat anyone with disrespect just because they are different from me. We are all created by the Almighty and like Him, I love all of humanity. We would all be better off if we loved God and loved each other.”
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Weisshaupt on December 19, 2013, 12:44:13 PM
Quote
‘Duck Dynasty’ Star: A Vagina Is ‘More Desirable Than A Man’s Anus’

Do you know what this is?  Its Hunger Games.  Its a reality show aimed at subjugating and ridiculing people like Phil Robertson. Giving  effeminate males like PJ Boy something to feel superior about and to.. and largely just showing people like Phil on screen is sufficient to do that. But Phil did this:

(http://static3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111123012925/thehungergames/images/0/00/2011-11-15-10-38-33-5-katniss-delivers-a-farewell-salute-this-gesture-i.jpeg)

And that can't be tolerated.  Katniss in Hunger Games  with that gesture shows solidarity not only with the dead girl from District 12, but with all who are forced to  loose children  in a reality show spectacle that is ultimately a form of  humiliation and subjugation  for the entertainment of the elite.  The story contrived a way to let her survive as "good television" - a decision  the show's director ultimately pays for with his life. Otherwise she would have been killed by a wild animal or some such, or simply edited out of the program, reported Dead. .

Obviously the folks at A&E aren't willing to pay that price.  So they Kill Phil  before he can become a martyr or a symbol.
Too Late.
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: ToddF on December 19, 2013, 01:12:55 PM
Beck wants them for his network.  It would probably be a pretty good fit.
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Libertas on December 19, 2013, 02:18:55 PM
Like they'd miss the idiots and deviants they kowtow to!  Ratings mean money, I guess they got enough of the latter to piss off more than a minority of the population...

Jackasses!  Show 'em your sunny side and go elsewhere!
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Weisshaupt on December 19, 2013, 03:09:07 PM
Quote
You Can’t Duck the Culture Wars (http://www.imao.us/index.php/2013/12/you-cant-duck-the-culture-wars/)
Posted by Frank J.: December 19, 2013 11:00 am
Well, who would have thunk: Someone known for being an open Christian is not super big on sodomy. Now, I don’t think Phil Robertson put things the nicest way, but it’s a bit of a stretch to call him a hater just for quoting the bible and saying he doesn’t get the appeal of sodomy, and this firing of him by A&E just seems insane when a “Phil goes to sensitivity training” episode would be great TV.

Anyway, this just goes to the point that there is no avoiding the culture war; you will be made to tolerate. And then you will be made to celebrate. And if you don’t, you’re the enemy. We can’t just let them shut down all debate by calling people haters. If you disagree with Phil’s view on sodomy, then instead of trying to dismiss him as a hater, you should be able to defend sodomy on the merits. Any time people are so quick to shut down debate, though, that always makes me suspect they have weak arguments. Plus if you think homosexual acts aren’t a sin, your beef is with Paul, not Phil.

And at some point these big gay agenda organizations that rallied against Phil need to die down. It’s not good for anyone — regardless of sexual orientation — to center much of his or her life around what gender one lusts after.

No Sensitivity training episode, because forced brainwashing where they have to make arguments to combat his won't make good TV nor the message they want, and of course their arguments are weak .  Putting him on that platform would be the  equivalent of letting Katniss live so you can play the star-crossed lovers angle.

 
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: ChrstnHsbndFthr on December 19, 2013, 03:17:27 PM
Anyway, this just goes to the point that there is no avoiding the culture war; you will be made to tolerate. And then you will be made to celebrate. And if you don’t, you’re the enemy.

I cannot help but respond that you missed one....and I offer the following correction:
Anyway, this just goes to the point that there is no avoiding the culture war; you will be made to tolerate. And then you will be made to celebrate. AND THEN YOU WILL BE MADE TO PARTICIPATE. And if you don’t, you’re the enemy.

This has been done in other issues, clothing, alcohol, premarital-sex, drugs, etc.....the pressure is immense and you are considered the enemy if you do not participate.
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Pablo de Fleurs on December 19, 2013, 04:02:04 PM


A&E Contact Info:

Going to send a few strongly worded emails pertaining to orifices & their intended functions. >:(

(https://scontent-b-lga.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/1483307_10152158693283417_1880909349_n.png)




Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Pandora on December 19, 2013, 07:12:13 PM
Anyway, this just goes to the point that there is no avoiding the culture war; you will be made to tolerate. And then you will be made to celebrate. And if you don’t, you’re the enemy.

I cannot help but respond that you missed one....and I offer the following correction:
Anyway, this just goes to the point that there is no avoiding the culture war; you will be made to tolerate. And then you will be made to celebrate. AND THEN YOU WILL BE MADE TO PARTICIPATE. And if you don’t, you’re the enemy.

This has been done in other issues, clothing, alcohol, premarital-sex, drugs, etc.....the pressure is immense and you are considered the enemy if you do not participate.

That's right.  Damn straight.  And I'm not supposed to exude "vitriol" over this because ...... why again?  I forget.  Nah, scratch that.

I don't care.
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Pablo de Fleurs on December 19, 2013, 09:00:05 PM
Quote

In a Duck's What?

From
: "PablodeFleurs" <xxx@xxx.com>

To
: Abbe.Raven@aetn.co, whitney.goit@aetn.com, robert.debitetto@aetn.com, colleen.conway@aetn.com, ae.viewerrelations@aetv.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 19, 2013 09:53 PM


Dear Y'all,

Did you know that you can stick a brand new, sharpened pencil in the ear canal? It fits - almost 1/2 way before you'd reach your brain!
Humans can also stick 6" replicas of the empire state building into their nostrils (painful, but you can do it!)...

...but that doesn't mean you should. It'd be pretty perverted & not at all normal.

Likewise with the anus. The anus is an exit strategy waiting to happen. Luckily for me it occurs exactly between my morning cup of Kimono Dragon coffee & my AM run. Bingo. Magic. Lose 2 pounds & I'm off for 5 or six miles. But, aside from a little hemorrhoid ointment, now & again…I never stick anything UP my anus. Why (I can hear you asking over the ether)??

· It’s uncomfortable
· It leads to an eventual loss of elasticity
· It leads to anal cancer
· Penises, when inserted, especially lead to HIV & AIDS…and semen does a pretty good job at pock marking & burrowing into the soft lining of the intestine (that’s it’s, uhm job…burrowing)
· And it’s, uhm…f*cking perverted (see the ear & nose example, above)

But the vagina? That’s way different kids. It’ll take tampons, fingers, tongues (yum!) as well as penises day in & day out and work just fine! Yep, to quote John Cameron Swayze; “It takes a licking & keep on ticking!” (literally!) – but of course that’s ‘cause it’s what it’s designed to do (in the course of monogamous, marital relationships, mind you)

Just because you’ve grown accustomed to the marketing & cultural assault of faggots & sodomites – and their assertions that what they do is simply an “alternative” lifestyle (which it’s not, it’s pure perversion), you really shouldn’t mess with the free expression of ideas, especially when expressed in a non-hateful manner as did Phil Robertson.

But you did and now you're f**ked. Good luck with that.

Sincerely,

Pablo de Fleurs
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Pandora on December 19, 2013, 10:30:43 PM
Well, that's putting it right out there and I guess it needed saying.  The only thing you missed was the aromatics of the scene.  Pro and con,
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Predator Don on December 19, 2013, 11:40:00 PM
Quote

In a Duck's What?

From
: "PablodeFleurs" <xxx@xxx.com>

To
: Abbe.Raven@aetn.co, whitney.goit@aetn.com, robert.debitetto@aetn.com, colleen.conway@aetn.com, ae.viewerrelations@aetv.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 19, 2013 09:53 PM


Dear Y'all,

Did you know that you can stick a brand new, sharpened pencil in the ear canal? It fits - almost 1/2 way before you'd reach your brain!
Humans can also stick 6" replicas of the empire state building into their nostrils (painful, but you can do it!)...

...but that doesn't mean you should. It'd be pretty perverted & not at all normal.

Likewise with the anus. The anus is an exit strategy waiting to happen. Luckily for me it occurs exactly between my morning cup of Kimono Dragon coffee & my AM run. Bingo. Magic. Lose 2 pounds & I'm off for 5 or six miles. But, aside from a little hemorrhoid ointment, now & again…I never stick anything UP my anus. Why (I can hear you asking over the ether)??

· It’s uncomfortable
· It leads to an eventual loss of elasticity
· It leads to anal cancer
· Penises, when inserted, especially lead to HIV & AIDS…and semen does a pretty good job at pock marking & burrowing into the soft lining of the intestine (that’s it’s, uhm job…burrowing)
· And it’s, uhm…f*cking perverted (see the ear & nose example, above)

But the vagina? That’s way different kids. It’ll take tampons, fingers, tongues (yum!) as well as penises day in & day out and work just fine! Yep, to quote John Cameron Swayze; “It takes a licking & keep on ticking!” (literally!) – but of course that’s ‘cause it’s what it’s designed to do (in the course of monogamous, marital relationships, mind you)

Just because you’ve grown accustomed to the marketing & cultural assault of faggots & sodomites – and their assertions that what they do is simply an “alternative” lifestyle (which it’s not, it’s pure perversion), you really shouldn’t mess with the free expression of ideas, especially when expressed in a non-hateful manner as did Phil Robertson.

But you did and now you're f**ked. Good luck with that.

Sincerely,

Pablo de Fleurs


Nice......I can't wait to see if u get a response....lol
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: ChrstnHsbndFthr on December 20, 2013, 12:19:41 AM
The Robertson Family has issued a statement:

"We want to thank all of you for your prayers and support. The family has spent much time in prayer since learning of A&E’s decision. We want you to know that first and foremost we are a family rooted in our faith in God and our belief that the Bible is His word. While some of Phil’s unfiltered comments to the reporter were coarse, his beliefs are grounded in the teachings of the Bible. Phil is a Godly man who follows what the Bible says are the greatest commandments: “Love the Lord your God with all your heart” and “Love your neighbor as yourself.” Phil would never incite or encourage hate.We are disappointed that Phil has been placed on hiatus for expressing his faith, which is his constitutionally protected right. We have had a successful working relationship with A&E but, as a family, we cannot imagine the show going forward without our patriarch at the helm. We are in discussions with A&E to see what that means for the future of Duck Dynasty. Again, thank you for your continued support of our family."
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: oldcoastie6468 on December 20, 2013, 12:31:19 AM
And what's crazy? A&E is running a "Duck Dynasty" marathon this weekend. Guess who's on those programs?  ::thinking::
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Pablo de Fleurs on December 20, 2013, 04:39:48 AM
Woohoo...this is generating a lot of steam: both publicly & personally:

Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: AlanS on December 20, 2013, 06:41:17 AM
I wonder how the Robertsons will survive without all of the gay duck hunters watching the show and buying calls? ::exitstageleft::
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Pablo de Fleurs on December 20, 2013, 07:06:32 AM
I wonder how the Robertsons will survive without all of the gay duck hunters watching the show and buying calls? ::exitstageleft::

Two gay duck hunters are deep in the woods, unsuccessful in their hunting. Bored, 1 says to the other, "I know, let's play Hide & Seek!"

"Oh goody" says the 2nd "what are the rules?"

"I hide, and if you find me, I'll give you a BJ" says his partner.

"Bu...but...suppose I don't find you?" whimpers the 2nd

"Oh, I'll be right over there, behind the big oak tree!"
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Libertas on December 20, 2013, 07:16:33 AM
As popular as they are these people could start their own network and leave A&E in the dust.

Maybe then A&E can go full-time queer and all will be happy.

Lemme know if that letter ever gets a response...I bet it will only generate silence.
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: AmericanPatriot on December 20, 2013, 07:52:55 AM
I've seen people say that the rest of the Robertsons should boycott the show.
I'm not sure.
If they feel that their mission or calling to to provide an example and witness to their faith, they should continue.

This show has given them a pulpit bigger than any they could have ever gotten on their own.
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Libertas on December 20, 2013, 08:16:35 AM
True, but they can choose the time of their departure, and make any comment they want on the way out.  If the network censors it, that too will come out and their fame and the networks shame will be as it will.
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Weisshaupt on December 20, 2013, 09:05:52 AM
True, but they can choose the time of their departure, and make any comment they want on the way out.  If the network censors it, that too will come out and their fame and the networks shame will be as it will.
Its a Pulpit of the type they gave Katniss. They don't need it or want it  if they don't have editorial control. 

If they want a pulpit to speak from they start their own network and their  own show. Heck,  they could hire a film crew, take their sponsors and distribute their show on the internet only.  Make deals with Amazon, itunes, netflix and Hulu to distribute it over their systems as well.   At some point all content will be A la Carte.

Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: ToddF on December 20, 2013, 09:17:32 AM
Phil Robertson in a Diversity Training course, amongst a bunch of Pajama Boy types?

I'd pay to watch that.   ::popcorn::
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: ToddF on December 20, 2013, 01:29:19 PM
If Duck Dynasty moves to Beck, A&E has their replacement.  Apologies for this once, not filtering the language, but this one deserves a home here, as it's today's internets winner.

(http://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/754/3488/original.jpg?w=600&h)

 ::laughonfloor::
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: LadyVirginia on December 20, 2013, 01:38:07 PM
I've never watched it but I really think this is just the program that could make the jump to another venue and be wildly successful.
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Pablo de Fleurs on December 20, 2013, 01:54:33 PM
If Duck Dynasty moves to Beck, A&E has their replacement.  Apologies for this once, not filtering the language, but this one deserves a home here, as it's today's internets winner.

(http://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/754/3488/original.jpg?w=600&h)

 ::laughonfloor::

See...& raise...
 ::laughonfloor:: ::laughonfloor::
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Magnum on December 20, 2013, 05:01:58 PM
Quote

In a Duck's What?

From
: "PablodeFleurs" <xxx@xxx.com>

To
: Abbe.Raven@aetn.co, whitney.goit@aetn.com, robert.debitetto@aetn.com, colleen.conway@aetn.com, ae.viewerrelations@aetv.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 19, 2013 09:53 PM


Dear Y'all,

Did you know that you can stick a brand new, sharpened pencil in the ear canal? It fits - almost 1/2 way before you'd reach your brain!
Humans can also stick 6" replicas of the empire state building into their nostrils (painful, but you can do it!)...

...but that doesn't mean you should. It'd be pretty perverted & not at all normal.

Likewise with the anus. The anus is an exit strategy waiting to happen. Luckily for me it occurs exactly between my morning cup of Kimono Dragon coffee & my AM run. Bingo. Magic. Lose 2 pounds & I'm off for 5 or six miles. But, aside from a little hemorrhoid ointment, now & again…I never stick anything UP my anus. Why (I can hear you asking over the ether)??

· It’s uncomfortable
· It leads to an eventual loss of elasticity
· It leads to anal cancer
· Penises, when inserted, especially lead to HIV & AIDS…and semen does a pretty good job at pock marking & burrowing into the soft lining of the intestine (that’s it’s, uhm job…burrowing)
· And it’s, uhm…f*cking perverted (see the ear & nose example, above)

But the vagina? That’s way different kids. It’ll take tampons, fingers, tongues (yum!) as well as penises day in & day out and work just fine! Yep, to quote John Cameron Swayze; “It takes a licking & keep on ticking!” (literally!) – but of course that’s ‘cause it’s what it’s designed to do (in the course of monogamous, marital relationships, mind you)

Just because you’ve grown accustomed to the marketing & cultural assault of faggots & sodomites – and their assertions that what they do is simply an “alternative” lifestyle (which it’s not, it’s pure perversion), you really shouldn’t mess with the free expression of ideas, especially when expressed in a non-hateful manner as did Phil Robertson.

But you did and now you're f**ked. Good luck with that.

Sincerely,

Pablo de Fleurs

Thank you Pablo.

One of the most fascinating classes I took in Graduate school was Immunology. Another of the many reasons I believe in the God of the Bible. Our immune systems are extremely complex but wonderfully created. Through a complex process if Macrophages, B helper cells, T cells, interleukin signalling....... and a cornucopia of other actors, the body can literally attack and destroy millions upon millions of different antigens. I heard from an honest professor the truth about AIDS.

Anyway, as Pablo stated homosexual practices takes a physical toll on the human body. Many homosexuals have suppressed immune systems from sperm entering the blood stream trough the thin cellular walls of the anal canal which reeks havoc with T-helper cells and thus immno compromising the participants, leading to cancers, AIDS, hepatitis B, and many other diseases that could be easily destroyed by a healthy immune system. Many are having to wear a colostomy’s bags due to their life styles. Many too will contact hepatitis A due to ingesting of feces and more many will be infected with amoeba, giardia, and shigella colonies due to the same practices aka Gay Bowel Syndrome. All of which can lead to premature death.

I have seen many beautiful things in my life such as sitting atop the Rockies as the sun is setting. Fishing on the Lakes in Northern Minnesocold. Driving up the Pacific Coast Highway on the left coast. However, nothing to me is more beautiful or enjoyable as a women's body.
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Pablo de Fleurs on December 20, 2013, 06:28:35 PM
Thanks for the medically based backup, Magnum. As a friend of mine is fond of saying. "Don't use the word 'assh*le' in a derogatory manner. I really like mine - it functions perfectly when used as designed."  ;D

I sent them all a quick, follow up email today:

Quote
From: "Pablo de Fleurs" <xxxx@xxx.com>
To:Abbe.Raven@aetn.com, whitney.goit@aetn.com, robert.debitetto@aetn.com, colleen.conway@aetn.com, ae.viewerrelations@aetv.com
Sent: Fri, Dec 20, 2013 06:30 PM

Busy reading, boys, girls & transgender freaks...???

Or has the cat got yr collective crotch(es)??

No response. None anticipated (dang).
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Pablo de Fleurs on December 20, 2013, 10:06:09 PM
God bless Alliance Defending Freedom.

Why the Duck Dynasty Saga Gives TWO Reasons for Hope this Christmas
Thanks to Phil Robertson, GQ magazine, and A&E, two great dialogues have begun which should give all Americans hope for the future
by Alliance Defending Freedom | Posted Dec 20, 2013
http://blog.alliancedefendingfreedom.org/2013/12/20/why-the-duck-dynasty-saga-gives-two-reasons-for-hope-this-christmas/ (http://blog.alliancedefendingfreedom.org/2013/12/20/why-the-duck-dynasty-saga-gives-two-reasons-for-hope-this-christmas/)

 
First, it is refreshing that a few on the left understand what is really at stake here.   Yes, we disagree about the underlying issues, but at least we agree that there should be a robust dialogue on this.  Silencing speech does nothing but to reinforce the notion that some would “win” at all costs – even the cost of someone’s freedom.

Contrary to what one judge said in an Alliance Defending Freedom New Mexico speech case, fforfeiting your First Amendment rights is NOT “the price of citizenship.”   The price of citizenship is having to hear ideas and opinions that you don’t agree with.  The duty of citizenship is to seek the truth and apply those truths in developing public policy.  But the truth cannot be discovered when elitists stifle debate.  Rather truth is exchanged for propaganda or mandatory conformity.

Read two great evidences of intellectual honesty and goodwill from folks on the Left who publicly endorse both homosexual behavior and same-sex marriage:

    The ‘Duck Dynasty’ Fiasco Says More About Our Bigotry Than Phil’s: Why is our go-to political strategy for beating our opponents to slience them? Why do we dismiss, rather than engage them?
    Duck Dynasty uproar ‘utterly fascist, utterly Stalinist’

Second, it gives us a moment to remember that there are brothers and sisters among us who wrestle, or have wrestled, with same-sex attraction (SSA) – who know that any sexual behavior outside of God’s design for a married husband and wife is sin – and who are sometimes inadvertently injured by the tone and tenor of how it can be presented.

Whenever believers downplay the inner turmoil these brothers and sisters face with SSA, it can unintentionally cause those who have dealt with SSA to feel even more discouraged as Christians, even more disheartened by their past (or present), and gain even more of a sense that there is no place for them among the Body of Christ.

We want to bless, not burden, someone trying to find peace and joy in their journey to overcome same-sex attraction.

Sadly, the opportunity to focus more on this particular dialogue has been denied us through the reaction of A&E to join the speech police and punish Phil for even expressing his opinion. Instead they added to the growing list of attacks on all Americans freedom of conscience. Chick-fil-A, Pastor Louis Giglio, and our own clients like Elane Photography, Arlene’s Flowers, or Conestoga Wood Specialties (fighting against Obamacare’s Abortion Pill Mandate) have all faced the cowardly and intolerant reaction of a culture that fears any opposition to what is not currently “politically correct.” It has become the war-cry of too many on the Left; and it threatens the entire American way of life.

Still, we cannot help but be greatly encouraged and hopeful for a vast future in America if more of these types of honest dialogues continue – and are joined by more people of goodwill all across this great land.

May God bless us, every one.

(http://blog.alliancedefendingfreedom.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/StatementIMG_PhilRobertson.png)
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: trapeze on December 21, 2013, 12:56:38 AM
...homosexual practices takes a physical toll on the human body. Many homosexuals have suppressed immune systems from sperm entering the blood stream trough the thin cellular walls of the anal canal which reeks havoc with T-helper cells and thus immno compromising the participants, leading to cancers, AIDS, hepatitis B, and many other diseases that could be easily destroyed by a healthy immune system. Many are having to wear a colostomy’s bags due to their life styles. Many too will contact hepatitis A due to ingesting of feces and more many will be infected with amoeba, giardia, and shigella colonies due to the same practices aka Gay Bowel Syndrome. All of which can lead to premature death.

Think of it as evolution in action.
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Pablo de Fleurs on December 21, 2013, 11:39:01 AM
I received a little negative feedback re: Duck Dynasty this week...from a few pickle-weaned, uptight Christians who didn't like the language Phil used, saying it had nothing to do with scripture - which provoked a little scriptural thinking on my part...

Quote
Proverbs 5:16-20 | New King James Version (NKJV)

16 Should your fountains be dispersed abroad,
Streams of water in the streets?
17 Let them be only your own,
And not for strangers with you.
18 Let your fountain be blessed,
And rejoice with the wife of your youth.
19 As a loving deer and a graceful doe,
Let her breasts satisfy you at all times;
And always be enraptured with her love.

20 For why should you, my son, be enraptured by an immoral woman,
And be embraced in the arms of a seductress?
(I have to go out on a limb here & assume that this passage includes, though it does not specifically say so...the, uhm "V" word).

Dang, Phil.........................................you ROCK!  ::thumbsup::

God rest ye, Duck-clad gentlemen
Let culture not you dismay.
Remember Christ, our savior was born on Christmas day.
To save us from A&E's satanic scour
When you had something to say.
Oh-oh tidings of duck-calls & joy
Duck-calls & joy
Oh-oh tidings of duck-calls & joy!


(http://i226.photobucket.com/albums/dd27/gablabs/2013%20Blog%20Art/DuckDynasty_zps86a66042.jpg)

.

And, in my 3rd & final communique to A&E, I copied all this & sent it to 'em with a nice Christmas bow.  ;D

Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: trapeze on December 21, 2013, 10:09:00 PM
So Cracker Barrel restaurants have bravely decided to keep all of the Duck Commander products on the shelf that do not have Phil Robertson's likeness. The Cracker Barrel Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/CrackerBarrel) comments are about what you might expect. There shouldn't be much trouble finding a table on Sunday afternoons anymore.

You would think that, after what happened with Chick-Fil-A restaurants, they might have a clue as to what to do and what not to do as regards their Christian customers but apparently not.

Might be a good opportunity for a short sell play.
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Alphabet Soup on December 21, 2013, 10:58:41 PM
Quote
CB posted: Cracker Barrel’s mission is Pleasing People. We operate within the ideals of fairness, mutual respect and equal treatment of all people. These ideals are the core of our corporate culture.

We continue to offer Duck Commander products in our stores.

We removed selected products which we were concerned might offend some of our guests while we evaluate the situation.

We continually evaluate the products we offer and will continue to do so.

So Alphabet Soup responded with the age-old conundrum: It deeply offends me that you removed some objects that may offend others. Now what are you gonna do?

 ::evil::
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: trapeze on December 22, 2013, 12:56:39 AM
Quote
CB posted: Cracker Barrel’s mission is Pleasing People. We operate within the ideals of fairness, mutual respect and equal treatment of all people. These ideals are the core of our corporate culture.

We continue to offer Duck Commander products in our stores.

We removed selected products which we were concerned might offend some of our guests while we evaluate the situation.

We continually evaluate the products we offer and will continue to do so.

So Alphabet Soup responded with the age-old conundrum: It deeply offends me that you removed some objects that may offend others. Now what are you gonna do?

 ::evil::

Twitter is pretty hot with this, too. Cracker Barrel has truly screwed the pooch with this move.
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Dan on December 22, 2013, 01:48:02 AM
When are they gonna learn?.....The culture wars aren't quite what they think they are.
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Pandora on December 22, 2013, 02:25:06 AM
Quote
You would think that, after what happened with Chick-Fil-A restaurants, they might have a clue as to what to do and what not to do as regards their Christian customers but apparently not.

Yah, you'd think, but Dan's right; for some reason, they never learn. 

The Barilla Pasta CEO did something equally stoopey, if you remember:  stated his position as using only families in their ads, then back-pedaled as soon as the weirdos started screeching.  If they can't stand by their statements, better they say nothing than swing first one way, then another, because, in the end, it pisses everybody off.
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Pablo de Fleurs on December 22, 2013, 03:49:49 AM
Other Networks Circle Like Sharks; If A&E Passes, We're In!
58 minutes ago BY TMZ STAFF

"Duck Dynasty" will NOT go homeless if A&E decides to pull the plug ... TMZ has learned, at least two other networks are salivating at the chance to pick up the popular reality show.

The owner of the popular Christian-affiliated Hunt Channel -- a guy named Merrill Sport -- tells TMZ, he'd pick up DD in a heart beat ... and would beam the show straight to its most loyal viewers: sportsmen and Christians.

He says, "We believe in the 2nd amendment and freedom of speech ... A&E needs to put on their big boy pants, and if they don't like the programming, they need to either let [DD] go or shut up and pay them."

Sports adds, "A&E is too scripted. [Hunt Channel] would let the personalities flow."

Rusty Faulk, CEO of the outdoorsy Pursuit Channel agrees, telling us Pursuit is 100% interested in grabbing DD if A&E takes a pass. Rusty adds, "We don't censor our personalities."

Even if DD comes to an end on A&E, we're told its contract with the family provides they couldn't do another show for a certain period of time.


http://www.tmz.com/2013/12/22/duck-dynasty-other-networks-interested-the-hunt-channel-a-and-e/ (http://www.tmz.com/2013/12/22/duck-dynasty-other-networks-interested-the-hunt-channel-a-and-e/)
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Pablo de Fleurs on December 22, 2013, 04:08:34 AM
Charlie Daniels to Piers Morgan: ‘You Wouldn’t Last Five Minutes’ in the Duck Dynasty Swamps
http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/2013/12/21/charlie-daniels-piers-morgan-wouldnt-last-five-minutes-duck-dynasty-swamps/ (http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/2013/12/21/charlie-daniels-piers-morgan-wouldnt-last-five-minutes-duck-dynasty-swamps/)

NewsBusters guest contributor Charlie Daniels has had enough of CNN’s Piers Morgan attacking Americans he doesn’t agree with.

After Morgan said about Duck Dynasty‘s Phil Robertson via Twitter Thursday, “[T]he 1st Amendment shouldn’t protect vile bigots,” Daniels scolded the arrogant Brit Friday with a series of tweets that began, “Piers Morgan why don’t you go back to England and straighten it out before you try to change the United States of America”:

@CharlieDaniels
Piers Morgan you woudn't last fiveminutes in the swamps Phil Robertson hangs out it. Want to try it? I'll arrange it. Let me know
9:51 PM - 20 Dec 2013



(http://i1.wp.com/www.theminorityreportblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Charlie-and-Piers.jpg?w=700)
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Weisshaupt on December 22, 2013, 08:31:40 AM

I cannot help but respond that you missed one....and I offer the following correction:
Anyway, this just goes to the point that there is no avoiding the culture war; you will be made to tolerate. And then you will be made to celebrate. AND THEN YOU WILL BE MADE TO PARTICIPATE. And if you don’t, you’re the enemy.

This has been done in other issues, clothing, alcohol, premarital-sex, drugs, etc.....the pressure is immense and you are considered the enemy if you do not participate.

Quote
First, Bob Hope, touring the world in the year or so after the passage of the 1975 Consenting Adult Sex Bill:

“I’ve just flown in from California, where they’ve made homosexuality legal. I thought I’d get out before they make it compulsory.”

For Hope, this was an oddly profound gag, discerning even at the dawn of the Age of Tolerance that there was something inherently coercive about the enterprise. Soon it would be insufficient merely to be “tolerant” — warily accepting, blithely indifferent, mildly amused, tepidly supportive, according to taste. The forces of “tolerance” would become intolerant of anything less than full-blown celebratory approval. (http://www.nationalreview.com/article/366896/age-intolerance-mark-steyn)
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Alphabet Soup on December 22, 2013, 01:24:28 PM
I caught Steyn's piece - I thought it was great.

Have you seen the blowback from it? You have to check this out!

Steyn on Speech
By Jason Lee Steorts

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/366912/steyn-speech-jason-lee-steorts (http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/366912/steyn-speech-jason-lee-steorts)

Be sure to read the comments!
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: ChrstnHsbndFthr on December 22, 2013, 03:59:37 PM
The comments are ......often....well....entertaining......


For example:

<PaulR 
• 36 minutes ago 
 ?







When it comes to the legal restriction of speech, or the legal coercion of dissenters, I’ll storm the barricade with Mark. It amazes me that any soi-disant free people tolerate that sort of thing.

Sorry, chum, but its impossible to imagine a metrosexual swish like you storming anything except the Tommy Hilfilger counter when the sale begins.

   
4 ?   ?   
>
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: ChrstnHsbndFthr on December 22, 2013, 04:03:40 PM
Found this one particularly interesting:

<

Adam Weisshaupt 
• 2 hours ago
 ?







So, if I don't like how a woman, or a black, or a Muslim, or Homosexual behaves I can just fire them? I can refuse them service? Tell that to the people who have been sued because they tried to make a pariah of a Lefty protected class. If it weren't for the double standards, the left would have no standards at all. If its okay to culturally shun people, then why does the left advocate having so many laws that ban the shunning of people to subscribe to their point of view?

   
8 ?   ?   
>
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Pablo de Fleurs on December 22, 2013, 04:08:19 PM
Terry Bradshaw On Duck Dynasty's Phil Robertson & how Bradshaw was benched for 2 years due to Phil's great QB arm.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGUBNq9MMTE#t=15 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGUBNq9MMTE#t=15)
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: ChrstnHsbndFthr on December 22, 2013, 04:14:29 PM
Great find Pablo!!
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Pablo de Fleurs on December 22, 2013, 05:34:24 PM
(http://i226.photobucket.com/albums/dd27/gablabs/QuackQuack_zps7a23b752.jpg)
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: AlanS on December 22, 2013, 06:04:42 PM
I caught Steyn's piece - I thought it was great.

Have you seen the blowback from it? You have to check this out!

Steyn on Speech
By Jason Lee Steorts

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/366912/steyn-speech-jason-lee-steorts (http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/366912/steyn-speech-jason-lee-steorts)

Be sure to read the comments!

Why won't it go to the comments when I click on the "comments" button? ::thinking::
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Pablo de Fleurs on December 22, 2013, 06:30:12 PM
Thread won't be complete...without this:

ZZ Top Sharp Dressed Man (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pn2-b_opVTo#)
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Alphabet Soup on December 22, 2013, 07:23:44 PM
I caught Steyn's piece - I thought it was great.

Have you seen the blowback from it? You have to check this out!

Steyn on Speech
By Jason Lee Steorts

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/366912/steyn-speech-jason-lee-steorts (http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/366912/steyn-speech-jason-lee-steorts)

Be sure to read the comments!

Why won't it go to the comments when I click on the "comments" button? ::thinking::

Their comments are managed by Disqus. Their code is problematic and finicky on different version of browsers.
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Pablo de Fleurs on December 22, 2013, 08:56:14 PM
Damn Straight!

Quote
@PablodeFleurs
#CrackedBarrelLogic:
RT @CrackerBarrel #Mistake! We listened 2 U & we're sorry #DuckDynasty is back in stores.#Doh  goo.gl/zftvZe

EXCLUSIVE – Duck Dynasty’s Phil Robertson breaks his silence: Reality show star says he’s 'a lover not a hater' but REFUSES to back down from anti-gay comments

[Me: there's no such thing as 'anti-gay' - it's 'Pro-Normalcy']

    Duck Dynasty patriarch Phil Robertson is sticking by controversial comments he made about homosexuality to GQ magazine
    He told MailOnline that he was simply quoting from the Bible in saying that homosexuality is a sin
    In the GQ interview, Robertson said: 'Everything is blurred on what’s right and what’s wrong… Sin becomes fine. Start with homosexual behavior and just morph out from there... Bestiality, sleeping around with this woman and that woman and that woman and those men'
    Fans and supporters in his hometown of West Monroe, Louisiana have been vocal in support of Robertson
    TV network A&E suspended Robertson from the show over the comments
    A source close to the situation says they have no plans to fire him
    Cracker Barrel pulled Duck Dynasty items from its shelves but quickly reinstated them after customers complained
    Duck Dynasty regularly pulls in more than 12 million viewers


(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/12/22/article-2528043-1A425F9700000578-41_634x563.jpg)


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2528043/Duck-Dynasty-family-seen-today.html#ixzz2oGMMzUeB (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2528043/Duck-Dynasty-family-seen-today.html#ixzz2oGMMzUeB)
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Predator Don on December 23, 2013, 12:16:47 AM
Cracker barrels home office is close to where I live. The store in my hometown was as slow as I've ever seen it. ( no not the service, the patrons)

I'm not going to visit for a while. I don't think they decided to do the right thing, I think they changed their stance because they lost business.........I'm not sure the stupidity of their mindset has changed.
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: ChrstnHsbndFthr on December 24, 2013, 12:27:35 AM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2528043/Duck-Dynasty-family-seen-today.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2528043/Duck-Dynasty-family-seen-today.html)
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Libertas on December 30, 2013, 02:43:36 PM
Staying true to your principles is the best reward...I love it when stuff blows up in progressive faces.

All the Robertson's have to do is keep being themselves...everything will be just fine.
Title: Re: In a Duck's what?
Post by: Libertas on May 23, 2014, 08:10:33 AM
Phil still shootin' straight, not backing down one iota on his beliefs and his right to speak about them!

http://houston.cbslocal.com/2014/05/22/duck-dynasty-star-they-railed-against-me-for-giving-them-the-truth-about-their-sins/ (http://houston.cbslocal.com/2014/05/22/duck-dynasty-star-they-railed-against-me-for-giving-them-the-truth-about-their-sins/)

(http://i585.photobucket.com/albums/ss291/libertasinfinitio/Patriots/militarysalute.gif)