It's About Liberty: A Conservative Forum
Topics => Faith & Family => Topic started by: Libertas on January 05, 2014, 11:39:11 AM
-
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/friends-adopt-judge-landmark-ruling-article-1.1565408#ixzz2pMmtRwxh (http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/friends-adopt-judge-landmark-ruling-article-1.1565408#ixzz2pMmtRwxh)
Sure, why not? Kids are just another right, right? Just another object to be allowed to possess. WTF could possibly go wrong, eh? There's always more kids...
::bashing::
-
“G. calls KAL ‘Mommy’ and LEL ‘Daddy,’” and “although they live in separate households,” they “have created a nurturing family environment for G., including a well-thought-out, discussed and fluid method of sharing parenting responsibilities between their homes.”
"Their homes" meaning the adults' homes. The kid *has* no home. If the judge was smart (well, smartER; smart would have meant saying NO), she'd have told the adults to pick a permanent residence for the kid and have them rotate in and out. See how it feels for them to have to keeping packing up and moving/shuffling from one place to another.
-
“G. calls KAL ‘Mommy’ and LEL ‘Daddy,’” and “although they live in separate households,” they “have created a nurturing family environment for G., including a well-thought-out, discussed and fluid method of sharing parenting responsibilities between their homes.”
"Their homes" meaning the adults' homes. The kid *has* no home. If the judge was smart (well, smartER; smart would have meant saying NO), she'd have told the adults to pick a permanent residence for the kid and have them rotate in and out. See how it feels for them to have to keeping packing up and moving/shuffling from one place to another.
Can't be disrupting adults now...or thinking of the child first...that is so...so...old fashioned!
Seriously, the judge is a dolt.