It's About Liberty: A Conservative Forum

Topics => General Board => Topic started by: Glock32 on April 27, 2011, 01:51:38 PM

Title: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: Glock32 on April 27, 2011, 01:51:38 PM
I know this subject has come up from time to time on here. Moonbattery had a recent entry on it here: http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2011/04/my-princess-boy.html (http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2011/04/my-princess-boy.html)  Apparently the psychotic child abuser mother has now taken to dragging her victim around and displaying him in front of elementary school classes.
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: IronDioPriest on April 27, 2011, 02:05:53 PM
FTA:
Quote
The Facebook page My Princess Boy... provides a helpful masturbatory aid to homosexuals of the common pedophile strain by offering a public reservoir of photographs of little boys dressed up like girls by their moonbat mommies.

That's really what it's all about. Whether any given moonbat mommie happens to have homosexual masturbatory material on her radar, the intentional debasing of sexual roles, sexuality, and sexual nature all leads to advancing the proliferation and pervasiveness of homosexuality.

Who would do this to a child unless evil was their god?
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: John Florida on April 27, 2011, 02:14:15 PM
I know I'm spitting into the wind but why would a school allow her in.
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: LadyVirginia on April 27, 2011, 03:52:58 PM
I hadn't heard about this. 

My heart aches for this boy.

This mother writes about acceptance as if her child was born this way.  He wasn't; she created him.  She's obviously very proud of her work.  She is creating a freak and forcing stupid people into accepting him.  She is SICK.

I had a friend years ago that signed her boys up for figure skating, ballet and yoga.  Although she was married she definitely had man issues.  When the boys got to high school they quit all of those activities (the kids became major underage drinkers).  I could never figure out though why their dad who loved football and baseball never enrolled them in those programs.

Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: Glock32 on April 27, 2011, 04:17:41 PM
I could never figure out though why their dad who loved football and baseball never enrolled them in those programs.

A common thread among these women seems to be some sort of deep seated need for dominance, particularly dominance over passive males. I think they sublimate this need by transforming their male children. The example of the woman you know is not unlike the mothers of these "Princess Boys", because many of them also have actual fathers present -- which makes it all the more perplexing. These are all submissive men.

That sort of ties into another thing we've frequently discussed here, the cultural emasculation of the West. I cite as an example the prominence of what are outward signs of masculinity, but are actually just the "approved" outlets like sports and cliched advertisements for power tools or Maxim magazine and the like. Your example of the dad who loved football reminded me of that, it's as if we have produced generations who are only permitted to ape the outward manifestations of masculinity. Real men would under no circumstances allow their wives to put their sons into dresses.
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: Libertas on April 28, 2011, 07:25:22 AM
The gates of hell must be thrown wide open...
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: Dan on April 28, 2011, 08:36:54 AM
Last week or so, there was an article in the J.Crew Saturday blog thingamajig (spell check accepted "thingamajig"!!!) in which their chief designer or something posts an personal article. She talked about how lucky she was to have a "..little boy who likes his toenails hot-pink..."
We will never shop at J. Crew again, and if I get time, I'll let 'em know why.

And my friggin' nephew's fingernails have been painted 3 of the last 10 times I've seen him. He's a twin w/ a sister and they have an older sister, all of whom still share a room. The twins still share a bed!
Dad's a eunuch. That's becoming more clear as time goes by. I might hafta' have a talk w/ him this summer. If it doesn't go well, I care no more about it than for the distress it may cause my wife.

And don't worry 'bout my two boys...they're already hip to girls (ages 7 & 8) and can clog a toilet almost like ole' Dad!
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: IronDioPriest on April 28, 2011, 08:47:18 AM
Most of you know we have an adopted little daughter from China. Since these girls are the ONLY piece of their birthplace any of them have, and since they spent the first year of their lives together in the same orphanage, we keep in touch with other parents with whom we traveled to receive our daughters, and try to get together for reunions whenever possible, even though we're scattered all across the country. These girls all have their brothers and sisters from their adoptive families, but these "China sisters" are the closest they are ever gonna get to a birth family, so we make that happen for them.

Anyhoo, I say that to tell a story. One of the families lives in Iowa, so we see them a bit more often. The dad is a hulking man, career Army officer. No possible way you'd EVER accuse him of being anything less than a platinum man-card carrying sonofabitch.

Their last visit he sat at our kitchen table and allowed our two daughters to paint his fingernails fluorescent pink, and the girls just got the hugest kick out of it. It made their day.

It's not the nail polish that makes the princess-boys into victims. It's their mothers and their absent fathers in the service of Leftism and the radical homosexual agenda.
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: Dan on April 28, 2011, 09:00:53 AM
My guess is, IDP, he probably is Man enough to get away with that, ya' know? He entertained two little girls. They don't know anything about the bigger issues. While I have yet to play dolls w/ the girls, and don't think I'm quite comfortable enough to do that, I'll bend over backwards if I can.

And speaking of effort, your first paragraph put a lump in my throat.
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: IronDioPriest on April 28, 2011, 09:03:41 AM
I play Barbies and Polly Pockets all the time. You should try it sometime! Delight on a little girls face. Nothing like it.
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: John Florida on April 28, 2011, 10:09:00 AM
I play Barbies and Polly Pockets all the time. You should try it sometime! Delight on a little girls face. Nothing like it.

 I sat in on more tea parties than I can count as mine grew up.You have girls you do what they like. If my son wanted a Barby we would have a whole new problem to deal with.
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: LadyVirginia on April 28, 2011, 10:12:03 AM
There's a difference between moms treating their sons like girls and dads playing with their daughters.

Everyone of our daughters went through a phase of thinking it was  ::hysterical:: to put hair clips or bows or headbands on daddy's head.  And he'd laugh and play along.  It was funny because everyone understood the male/female distinction.

For what's it's worth--I was/am terrible at play with my daughters.  My older ones still tease me about not knowing how to play "dolls". I think I did a decent job being a customer when they played restaurant though.

From a mom's POV there's nothing so special as to seeing your husband having a tea party with his little girl.
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: Glock32 on April 28, 2011, 11:10:48 AM
Last week or so, there was an article in the J.Crew Saturday blog thingamajig (spell check accepted "thingamajig"!!!) in which their chief designer or something posts an personal article. She talked about how lucky she was to have a "..little boy who likes his toenails hot-pink..."
We will never shop at J. Crew again, and if I get time, I'll let 'em know why.

Moonbattery has an article about that too: http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2011/04/j-crew-contribu.html (http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2011/04/j-crew-contribu.html)

(http://www.moonbattery.com/J-Crew.jpg)


These moonbat mommies are creating monsters.
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: warpmine on April 28, 2011, 12:21:43 PM
Of course, nobody would ever think of calling CPS on this weirdo mother but then again from what we know of those programs today, they would asume it's normal behavior. Up is down, homesexuality is now and accepted"lifestyle" and now pink is manly, the only thing that will come of this is more evil.
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: BigAlSouth on April 28, 2011, 07:01:32 PM
This is nothing but a sexually perverted Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. The "mother" is seeking attention through the gender mis-identification of her child. By making the child the center of attention, she is, by proxy, enjoying the attention directed toward the unfortunate victim.

http://my.clevelandclinic.org/disorders/factitious_disorders/hic_munchausen_syndrome_by_proxy.aspx (http://my.clevelandclinic.org/disorders/factitious_disorders/hic_munchausen_syndrome_by_proxy.aspx)
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: LadyVirginia on April 28, 2011, 07:10:48 PM
This is nothing but a sexually perverted Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. The "mother" is seeking attention through the gender mis-identification of her child. By making the child the center of attention, she is, by proxy, enjoying the attention directed toward the unfortunate victim.

http://my.clevelandclinic.org/disorders/factitious_disorders/hic_munchausen_syndrome_by_proxy.aspx (http://my.clevelandclinic.org/disorders/factitious_disorders/hic_munchausen_syndrome_by_proxy.aspx)

That sums it up.

Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: John Florida on April 28, 2011, 07:59:32 PM
Is there even a father in all this mess?
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: BigAlSouth on April 28, 2011, 10:10:54 PM
. . . seems I recall a boy who had some "issues" because of his mothers treatment of him as a yute. What was his name?

Oh. I remember. Norman Bates.
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: LadyVirginia on April 28, 2011, 10:25:01 PM
. . . seems I recall a boy who had some "issues" because of his mothers treatment of him as a yute. What was his name?

Oh. I remember. Norman Bates.

 ::falldownshocked::
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: IronDioPriest on April 28, 2011, 11:04:35 PM
. . . seems I recall a boy who had some "issues" because of his mothers treatment of him as a yute. What was his name?

Oh. I remember. Norman Bates Barack (Barry) Hussein Soetoro Obama.

FIFY.
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: Glock32 on April 28, 2011, 11:53:44 PM
Perhaps even more troubling is if you read online articles about the J. Crew controversy, where there are so many comments saying there is nothing wrong with a mother painting her young son's toenails pink. Mommy Moonbat's little gender-bending amusements are going to clash hard up against testosterone when those kids get older. It's a recipe for deep seated issues with those kids.

Every now and then, for a fleeting moment, you can sort of understand why the jihadis think we are a disgustingly craven and decadent civilization deserving only of contempt.
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: Dan on April 29, 2011, 09:30:14 AM
Perhaps even more troubling is if you read online articles about the J. Crew controversy, where there are so many comments saying there is nothing wrong with a mother painting her young son's toenails pink. Mommy Moonbat's little gender-bending amusements are going to clash hard up against testosterone when those kids get older. It's a recipe for deep seated issues with those kids.

Every now and then, for a fleeting moment, you can sort of understand why the jihadis think we are a disgustingly craven and decadent civilization deserving only of contempt.

It's constant G...nothing fleeting about it. The "reality TV" crap, worship of pro athletes, obsession w/ the latest tech, ignorance of, well, all things important.
I wish the JCrew idiot and those like her were capable of creating monsters. They might be able to channel aggression and actually fight for their right to paint their friggin' toenails. As it is, these poor flits-in-the-making will be good for nothing except turning themselves, and the rest of us, into punching bags.
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: IronDioPriest on April 29, 2011, 09:43:31 AM
...Every now and then, for a fleeting moment, you can sort of understand why the jihadis think we are a disgustingly craven and decadent civilization deserving only of contempt...

...but then of course the very next moment we remember that a culture that institutionally kills women for showing an ankle has no business judging a society that allows people the freedom to do good or evil of their own volition.
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: AlanS on April 29, 2011, 03:26:06 PM
I can still remember the day my son received a Barbe doll from my sister after she saw him playing with one. For some reason, it ended in the trash.....rather quickly by me. He has now reached the teen-age years and seems to have devoloped with his masculinity in tact. I sometimes wonder if he were searching for an anatomically correct Barbe for research.
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: trapeze on April 29, 2011, 09:59:12 PM
I played with a Barbie doll once when I was a youngster.

I strapped it into the GI Joe jeep and rolled it downhill after lighting the fuse of the attached M80.

It was great fun for me. Barbie...not so much.
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: Pandora on April 29, 2011, 10:37:21 PM
I can still remember the day my son received a Barbe doll from my sister after she saw him playing with one. For some reason, it ended in the trash.....rather quickly by me. He has now reached the teen-age years and seems to have devoloped with his masculinity in tact. I sometimes wonder if he were searching for an anatomically correct Barbe for research.

As trap says, boys play with dolls differently than girls.

Your son might just as well turned her into a gun rather than blowing her up.  That's what boys do with normal mothers and fathers who are men-with-chests.
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: trapeze on April 30, 2011, 12:00:32 AM
BARBIE BLOW UP!!! Pink RC Car Explosion~ HILARIOUS!!! (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBIqipb4D08#)
Title: Re: more "Princess Boy" degeneracy
Post by: LadyVirginia on April 30, 2011, 03:19:53 PM
BARBIE BLOW UP!!! Pink RC Car Explosion~ HILARIOUS!!!

 ::cool::