Flush (http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_CRAFTS_ADULT_COLORING_BOOKS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2015-07-15-11-14-14)
Adult coloring books. And they aren't even porn.
Shapiro called him "sir". "That was rude". So, to get it straight, to call a him in a dress and makeup "sir" is rude.
I believe it's not only rude, but wrong, for a man to present in a dress and makeup and expect me to call him "ma'am".
Eric Erickson said it a while back, "you will be made to care", and he was right. I care. Just not in the way the deviants want or expect.
"Remove your hand or you'll be drawing back a bloody stump"
Shapiro called him "sir". "That was rude". So, to get it straight, to call a him in a dress and makeup "sir" is rude.
I believe it's not only rude, but wrong, for a man to present in a dress and makeup and expect me to call him "ma'am".
Eric Erickson said it a while back, "you will be made to care", and he was right. I care. Just not in the way the deviants want or expect.
Shapiro called him "sir". "That was rude". So, to get it straight, to call a him in a dress and makeup "sir" is rude.
I believe it's not only rude, but wrong, for a man to present in a dress and makeup and expect me to call him "ma'am".
Eric Erickson said it a while back, "you will be made to care", and he was right. I care. Just not in the way the deviants want or expect.
On Twitter:Correct as usual
@AnnBarnhardt
The statement "Bruce Jenner is a man" is now a hate crime. What exactly does this mean? It means you don't have nearly enough ammo. Buy more.
::thumbsup::
On Twitter:
@AnnBarnhardt
The statement "Bruce Jenner is a man" is now a hate crime. What exactly does this mean? It means you don't have nearly enough ammo. Buy more.
::thumbsup::
On Twitter:
@AnnBarnhardt
The statement "Bruce Jenner is a man" is now a hate crime. What exactly does this mean? It means you don't have nearly enough ammo. Buy more.
::thumbsup::
She writes that about almost everything. And she's right.
On Twitter:Hope water isn't to deep for recovery.
@AnnBarnhardt
The statement "Bruce Jenner is a man" is now a hate crime. What exactly does this mean? It means you don't have nearly enough ammo. Buy more.
::thumbsup::
She writes that about almost everything. And she's right.
And I'm woefully underarmed. Since the boating accident, ya know.
CALL ME CRAZY, BUT I DOUBT this New York Magazine article will recruit many men to the cause (http://nymag.com/thecut/2015/07/what-open-marriage-taught-one-man-about-feminism.html):QuoteAs I write this, my children are asleep in their room, Loretta Lynn is on the stereo, and my wife is out on a date with a man named Paulo. It’s her second date this week; her fourth this month so far. If it goes like the others, she’ll come home in the middle of the night, crawl into bed beside me, and tell me all about how she and Paulo had sex. I won’t explode with anger or seethe with resentment. I’ll tell her it’s a hot story and I’m glad she had fun. It’s hot because she’s excited, and I’m glad because I’m a feminist.
Before my wife started sleeping with other men, I certainly considered myself a feminist, but I really only understood it in the abstract..
Here’s a clue, champ: Paulo’s not a feminist. Count on it.
For my wife, the choice between honoring our vows and fulfilling her desires was a false choice, another trap. She knew how deep our love was, and knew that her wanting a variety of sexual experiences as we traveled through life together would not diminish or disrupt that love. It took me about six months — many long, intense conversations, and an ocean of red wine — before I knew it, too.
When my wife told me she wanted to open our marriage and take other lovers, she wasn’t rejecting me, she was embracing herself. When I understood that, I finally became a feminist.
There are of course moments of jealousy, resentment, and insecurity. Recently, my wife went on a date and fell asleep at his apartment. I hadn’t heard from her since 10 p.m., she still wasn’t home at 6 a.m. My texts went unanswered and my calls went to voicemail. A tight knot of dread lodged in my stomach as I imagined all kinds of dire scenarios and realized that I not only didn’t know where she was, I had no idea whom she was with. I pictured myself going to the police saying, “I think she’s in Red Hook with a guy named Ryan. I don’t know his last name, but I think he’s a graphic designer?” I’m not sure there’s actually a word for the unique blend of acute terror and unforgivable shame I felt that morning imagining that I’d lost my wife to Ryan, the maybe graphic designer. When she finally texted me at 7:30 a.m., relief coursed through me like morphine. She wrote, “f**kf**kf**kf**k Im soooooo sorry. Fell asleep.” I replied, “Just glad you’re ok, but next time, no radio silence. Remember: you’re not alone.
What surprises most people is when I tell them it’s not the sex-with-other-men that bothers me. The sex is the easy part, the fun part. It’s what the sex connects to, stands for, reveals that can be difficult. I don’t want her to fall in love with anyone else, and every time she goes on a date, I confront the possibility that she might. It happened at the beginning: The first person she dated after we opened up fell hard in love with her, and my wife, overwhelmed by his ardor, tried to love him back. Watching it happen, I was confused, angry, and terrified that she wanted to leave me. She assured me she didn’t, and whatever feelings she had for him didn’t lessen what she felt for me. Believing her then was the ultimate trust exercise. We survived because eventually I did believe her, and also because I learned to trust myself.
And more flush (http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/210909/)This idiot has kick me all over his being so why not?QuoteCALL ME CRAZY, BUT I DOUBT this New York Magazine article will recruit many men to the cause (http://nymag.com/thecut/2015/07/what-open-marriage-taught-one-man-about-feminism.html):QuoteAs I write this, my children are asleep in their room, Loretta Lynn is on the stereo, and my wife is out on a date with a man named Paulo. It’s her second date this week; her fourth this month so far. If it goes like the others, she’ll come home in the middle of the night, crawl into bed beside me, and tell me all about how she and Paulo had sex. I won’t explode with anger or seethe with resentment. I’ll tell her it’s a hot story and I’m glad she had fun. It’s hot because she’s excited, and I’m glad because I’m a feminist.
Before my wife started sleeping with other men, I certainly considered myself a feminist, but I really only understood it in the abstract..
Here’s a clue, champ: Paulo’s not a feminist. Count on it.
Yes, I will bet that too. She is going out with other men because "feminist men" aren't man enough to provide her with the experience of being with a man.QuoteFor my wife, the choice between honoring our vows and fulfilling her desires was a false choice, another trap. She knew how deep our love was, and knew that her wanting a variety of sexual experiences as we traveled through life together would not diminish or disrupt that love. It took me about six months — many long, intense conversations, and an ocean of red wine — before I knew it, too.
When my wife told me she wanted to open our marriage and take other lovers, she wasn’t rejecting me, she was embracing herself. When I understood that, I finally became a feminist.
And those stilly vows always getting the I the way and forcing you into the role of husband and wife.. But hey, your wife got you to accept being irresponsible as "freeing" and "embracing yourself" - and she loves you and respects you, and will put you first which is why she stops answering your calls....
and hey if she ends up dead in a alley you will at least know you did your job protecting her.QuoteThere are of course moments of jealousy, resentment, and insecurity. Recently, my wife went on a date and fell asleep at his apartment. I hadn’t heard from her since 10 p.m., she still wasn’t home at 6 a.m. My texts went unanswered and my calls went to voicemail. A tight knot of dread lodged in my stomach as I imagined all kinds of dire scenarios and realized that I not only didn’t know where she was, I had no idea whom she was with. I pictured myself going to the police saying, “I think she’s in Red Hook with a guy named Ryan. I don’t know his last name, but I think he’s a graphic designer?” I’m not sure there’s actually a word for the unique blend of acute terror and unforgivable shame I felt that morning imagining that I’d lost my wife to Ryan, the maybe graphic designer. When she finally texted me at 7:30 a.m., relief coursed through me like morphine. She wrote, “f**kf**kf**kf**k Im soooooo sorry. Fell asleep.” I replied, “Just glad you’re ok, but next time, no radio silence. Remember: you’re not alone.
What surprises most people is when I tell them it’s not the sex-with-other-men that bothers me. The sex is the easy part, the fun part. It’s what the sex connects to, stands for, reveals that can be difficult. I don’t want her to fall in love with anyone else, and every time she goes on a date, I confront the possibility that she might. It happened at the beginning: The first person she dated after we opened up fell hard in love with her, and my wife, overwhelmed by his ardor, tried to love him back. Watching it happen, I was confused, angry, and terrified that she wanted to leave me. She assured me she didn’t, and whatever feelings she had for him didn’t lessen what she felt for me. Believing her then was the ultimate trust exercise. We survived because eventually I did believe her, and also because I learned to trust myself.
and when she DOES eventually fall in love with one of her lovers, and does leave you, I am sure your kids - still young enough to need baby sitters- will thank you for your "feminism".
He's a wimp and she's a whore. I think that sums it up.
There is, of course, a more obvious explanation. Years of whinging about “micro-aggressions” and female empowerment and scolding and criticising his every move have turned him into an extreme beta cuckold. In other words, they’ve made him gay. And that’s where I’m placing my bets.
Sonmore is on the bleeding edge of a coming wave of gay-convert cuckolds. For an alpha queen like me, that means a veritable buffet of fresh meat to choose from. If you don’t believe me that it’s feminism driving this new wave of beta bottoms, take it from Michael:
Before my wife started sleeping with other men, I certainly considered myself a feminist, but I really only understood it in the abstract. When I quit working to stay at home with the kids, I began to understand it on a whole new level.
The logic is simple, if you think about it. Men are canny about cutting out the middleman whenever possible. If their wives are screwing them by consorting with other men, why not simplify everything by being screwed by men themselves? Think about what Sonmore has to show for his marriage today. A Starbucks gift card from his wife’s latest boyfriend Paulo, with the message, “Please enjoy this latte while I enjoy your wife”?
The award for the biggest Mangina of all time goes to Michael Sonmore!
Enjoy the sexually transmitted diseases! Enjoy raising Paulo's illicit love child while your wife is off screwing god knows who else. Enjoy the crushing financial burden of the divorce settlement when she finally gets bored of the empty space where your testicles used to be!
broomhandle | October 5, 2015 at 9:51 pm
I wish they’d chosen “Suck d*ck for feminism” instead. That would’ve closed the loop.
buckeyeminuteman | October 6, 2015 at 11:09 am
Liberal idea to prevent rape: piss in your pants to scare off the attacker
Logical idea to prevent rape: pull out a gun and make the attacker piss his pants
Henry Hawkins | October 6, 2015 at 6:11 pm
The overarching reveal here is that there is no limit to what a liberal will do if convinced the ends justify the means.
Cates contended that the "students in our schools are teenagers, not adults, and one's gender is not the same as one's anatomy."
Cafe Fellatio (http://www.thelocal.ch/20160623/geneva-to-get-cafe-fellatio-by-end-of-year)
(https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=imgres&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiandWZ277NAhVQ3mMKHY8aBUMQjRwIBw&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2Fstarbucks%2Fcomments%2F3f3ybf%2Fevolution_of_starbucks_as_predicted_by_the%2F&psig=AFQjCNGcGy1ftLNagTclOKYiJ1SuE7ZA1Q&ust=1466790672365113[img]
[img]http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/19fenbac6hnmyjpg/original.jpg)
Its just not funny anymore
I have to admit though, I might be interested in at least sampling the quality of their grind.