It's About Liberty: A Conservative Forum
Topics => General Board => Topic started by: LadyVirginia on June 22, 2011, 05:22:26 PM
-
the headline fails to mention he's in women's undergarments--not something I'd want to see IRL--the pic was bad enough (http://abcnews.go.com/US/man-wearing-lingerie-allowed-board-us-airways-flight/story?id=13906486)
-
"U.S. Airways Allows ObamaVoter® in Underwear to Fly"
FIFY
-
"U.S. Airways Allows ObamaVoter® in Underwear to Fly"
FIFY
::laughonfloor::
-
It's probably that he was in womens' underwear that made them let him on. Otherwise, there'd be the predictable outrage from the GLBT industry or whatever the hell they're calling themselves now.
-
So where was the TSA??
-
So where was the TSA??
Yeah, really. They want to friggin touch everything else.
Oh, wait--they save that for six-year-olds.
-
Instead of seating every San Francisco piece of garbage next to me on that 12 hour flight to Tokyo, seat him next to Muhammad.
Win win.
-
John, I'm sure the TSA was ecstatic. Hard to hide a bomb when you are wearing a bra and panties. And nothing else.
-
Must have just left a date with Barney Frank...
...put some real clothes on, nobody wants to see that sh*t!
Well, maybe the perverts at TSA...
::puke::