It's About Liberty: A Conservative Forum
Topics => Politics/Legislation/Elections => Topic started by: Libertas on August 30, 2011, 11:42:32 AM
-
If the economy isn't enough, here's more insurmountable problems for SCoaMF!
Only 39% support unconstitutional ObamaCare -
http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/poll-obamacare-support-all-time-low (http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/poll-obamacare-support-all-time-low)
(It should be under 30%, representing just the truly bat-sh*t effing crazy!)
CBC expressing their displeasure at Obama, feeling left naked at the plantation I guess -
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0811/62284.html (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0811/62284.html)
(Heh, push Obammy further left...I love it when that happens!)
Majority of US Musslims love Obama!
http://in.reuters.com/article/2011/08/30/idINIndia-59043020110830 (http://in.reuters.com/article/2011/08/30/idINIndia-59043020110830)
(I wanna hear this endorsement advertised far & wide by Obammy & the MFM!)
Obammy's Uncle Omar in the news, and not in a good way.
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=1362374 (http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=1362374)
(Drunk illegal criminal bastard...who'd he get here? Where's he get documents? WTF?!)
Obammy trying to please all (especially the world community and Isslamics) on 9-11 anniversary guarantees nobody will be happy!
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/30/us/politics/30terror.html?_r=2&partner=MYWAY&ei=5065 (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/30/us/politics/30terror.html?_r=2&partner=MYWAY&ei=5065)
(I want to see Christian protesters at each venue!)
Sucks to be SCoaMF!
Here's to hoping the sucking has just begun!
::evilbat::
-
Where'd Uncle get the documents, indeed! So much for "undocumented".
-
And somebody's been stealing watermelons from Michelle's garden .
-
And somebody's been stealing watermelons from Michelle's garden .
Don'tcha hate it when that happens?
-
The birthers should have directed their attention to SCOAMF's academic record (http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/08/early_obama_letter_confirms_inability_to_write.html) instead.
On November 16, 1990, Barack Obama, then president of the Harvard Law Review, published a letter in the Harvard Law Record, an independent Harvard Law School newspaper, championing affirmative action.
Although a paragraph from this letter was excerpted in David Remnick's biography of Obama, The Bridge, I had not seen the letter in its entirety before this week. Not surprisingly, it confirms everything I know about Barack Obama, the writer and thinker.
Obama was prompted to write by an earlier letter from a Mr. Jim Chen that criticized Harvard Law Review's affirmative action policies. Specifically, Chen had argued that affirmative action stigmatized its presumed beneficiaries.
The response is classic Obama: patronizing, dishonest, syntactically muddled, and grammatically challenged. In the very first sentence Obama leads with his signature failing, one on full display in his earlier published work: his inability to make subject and predicate agree.
The original letter is here. (http://www.hlrecord.org/2.4475/record-retrospective-obama-on-affirmative-action-1.577511?pagereq=1)
Gateway Pundit on same subject. (http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/08/early-letter-shows-that-even-as-a-law-student-obama-was-in-way-over-his-head/)
-
And somebody's been stealing watermelons from Michelle's garden .
"Stealing Watermelons" Elvin Bishop (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBP7jPFtmRk#)
-
The birthers should have directed their attention to SCOAMF's academic record (http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/08/early_obama_letter_confirms_inability_to_write.html) instead.
On November 16, 1990, Barack Obama, then president of the Harvard Law Review, published a letter in the Harvard Law Record, an independent Harvard Law School newspaper, championing affirmative action.
Although a paragraph from this letter was excerpted in David Remnick's biography of Obama, The Bridge, I had not seen the letter in its entirety before this week. Not surprisingly, it confirms everything I know about Barack Obama, the writer and thinker.
Obama was prompted to write by an earlier letter from a Mr. Jim Chen that criticized Harvard Law Review's affirmative action policies. Specifically, Chen had argued that affirmative action stigmatized its presumed beneficiaries.
The response is classic Obama: patronizing, dishonest, syntactically muddled, and grammatically challenged. In the very first sentence Obama leads with his signature failing, one on full display in his earlier published work: his inability to make subject and predicate agree.
The original letter is here. (http://www.hlrecord.org/2.4475/record-retrospective-obama-on-affirmative-action-1.577511?pagereq=1)
Gateway Pundit on same subject. (http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/08/early-letter-shows-that-even-as-a-law-student-obama-was-in-way-over-his-head/)
So, his grammar and oral composition skills are lousy, his knowledge bespeaks of great ignorance and he is racially biased? What's the point again? Did we learn something new?