It's About Liberty: A Conservative Forum
Topics => Politics/Legislation/Elections => Topic started by: Papa Bear on November 21, 2011, 05:21:29 PM
-
What a surprise (NOT!)
The sequester was designed and voted on by both parties and signed by the president, "specifically to be onerous," said White House spokesman Jay Carney. "It was designed so that it never came to pass."
See Fox News if you want to read the rest of the BullCr@p (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/11/21/clock-ticks-down-to-super-committee-failure/)!
-
Quite right P. Bear! It was not a surprise...
-
I visited the link only to find that smug A-hole kerry (did you know that he served in Vietnam?). I didn't bother to listen to his bellowing - I have a pretty good idea of what crap he's spewing. He's loving this. The dhimmicrats will exploit the sh!t out of the misery this is certain to cause.
-
The Dingus said that he will veto any over ride of the auto cuts.
I would like to see that.
-
I visited the link only to find that smug A-hole kerry (did you know that he served in Vietnam?). I didn't bother to listen to his bellowing - I have a pretty good idea of what crap he's spewing. He's loving this. The dhimmicrats will exploit the sh!t out of the misery this is certain to cause.
Sorry for the link - I really meant it (the bullcr@p part). How the (R)s ever signed up for this is beyond me. But then again, there seems to be damned little difference between establishment (R) types and the socialist (D) types.
-
No need to apologize! I always welcome the opportunity to bash lefty morons ::cool::
-
The Dingus said that he will veto any over ride of the auto cuts.
I would like to see that.
Me too.
-
This whole thing was a farce from the very beginning and is probably the most disgraceful abdication of responsiblity in the history of congress . I'm thoroughly digusted with all of then ... that lying bastard in the White House notwithstanding !
-
I visited the link only to find that smug A-hole kerry (did you know that he served in Vietnam?). I didn't bother to listen to his bellowing - I have a pretty good idea of what crap he's spewing. He's loving this. The dhimmicrats will exploit the sh!t out of the misery this is certain to cause.
He was in the "Brown Water Navy" and the nature of his service has ( justifiably ) been called into question .
-
This whole thing was a farce from the very beginning and is probably the most disgraceful abdication of responsiblity in the history of congress . I'm thoroughly digusted with all of then ... that lying bastard in the White House notwithstanding !
Warned them we did, failure they are!
-
There were never to be ANY CUTS, "automatic" or not. John Kerry let the cat out of the bag .... (http://freedomslighthouse.net/2011/11/21/democrat-sen-john-kerry-says-tax-increases-coming-in-2013-reveals-democrats-offered-no-real-cuts-in-spending-during-debt-deal-talks-video-112111/)
This is precisely why Barack Obama and his Democrat cohorts must be defeated in 2012. Here is Sen. John Kerry (AKA “Lurch”) this morning where he said tax increases are coming in 2013. When asked to give details on supposed “cuts” the Democrats put forward to get a debt deal, he immediately began backpeddling and made clear they were not actual “cuts” to spending programs, but only “slowing the rate of increase.”
Same sort of thing cited here (http://[url=http://www.bizjournals.com/louisville/blog/morning_call/2011/11/congress-might-avoid-automatic.html):
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said he supports the cuts because they don't actually reduce any defense spending. Rather, they cut back on the scheduled increases.
And here (http://maggiesfarm.anotherdotcom.com/archives/18622-Failure-of-the-Supercommittee.html#extended):
"I think we need to be honest about it," Paul said in an interview on CNN Sunday. "The interesting thing is there will be no cuts in military spending. This may surprise some people, but there will be no cuts in military spending because we're only cutting proposed increases. If we do nothing, military spending goes up 23 percent over 10 years. If we sequester the money, it will still go up 16 percent. So spending is still rising under any of these plans."
Only thing that was even considered, and that was rejected, was a cut in the increase of spending. And when Paul says "spending is still rising under ANY of these plans", I'm betting he's talking about the Republican "plans" as well.
These people DO NOT GET IT.
-
They don't get it because there isn't any danger of a noose hanging outside their windows.
These people, the majority of them are slime so you'll never get them to obey the constitution or even common sense until their well being or lives are threatened which conveniently they've made illegal. The result is an entitled aristocracy that's omnipitent. Most of them should be tried for treason and other crimes against the constitution of which they've violated again and again. I know this is a harsh assessment of the situation but we must face the truth, these people could care less for the country and even more so for the people to which they serve. Damn then all to Hell.
-
What get's lost in all the wrangling & he/she said is the true impact. Our "leaders" are condemning our kids, specifically my 2 boys, to a life of servitude. The "leaders" only care about one thing; power. They say the "right things" to get re-elected, get more seniority & get more power. Not only do they not care what the cost of the actual legislation is, they don't even read it.
a pox on both their houses!
-
SSDD...
We need a lot more pissed off people kicking their doors in!!!
-
SSDD...
We need a lot more pissed off people kicking their doors in!!!
We can't shield people because they "say" that they are (R), Conservative, or even Tea Party. They need to demonstrate it by their actions - continuously!