Here's the first question.
"I'm appalled you would begin a presidential debate on a topic like that."
Newt Destroys John King, Media Over Ex-Wife Question To Thunderous Standing Ovation (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OE4BAhHMsHY#ws)
Here's the first question.
"I'm appalled you would begin a presidential debate on a topic like that."
Newt Destroys John King, Media Over Ex-Wife Question To Thunderous Standing Ovation (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OE4BAhHMsHY#ws)
If barack hussian obama watched this debate, he is imploring the media elites to push thier attempt to utterly destroy Newt....because in a debate, he will utterly destroy barack hussian obama.
And this boorish snob of a leftist Hollywood loser has to opine on the Repub candidates...
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.b4f7ba9d08a9cca1db2e3fca893721dd.341&show_article=1 (http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.b4f7ba9d08a9cca1db2e3fca893721dd.341&show_article=1)
This guys face is fuglier than my butt and twice as stupid and he thinks a "mushroom cloud of ego" of gargantuan size doesn't hover over that POS Obama?!
Go back to France dillhole!
::mooning::
There is growing consternation in Republican circles and among conservatives over why Republicans keep allowing the various Communist, leftist and otherwise anti-American TV networks to host GOP debates.
The ickiness of Diana Sawyer asking questions in her cloying voice is more than most can bear. The utter cluelessness of the questions these people think actual American voters care about is mystifying. The shameless and ham-handed pandering to conservatives by the networks is revolting.
.....
From the moment the debate began, Mr. King tried setting the tone of the debate by lobbing unsubstantiated claims about Mr. Gingrich made by an ex-wife. News flash: The ex-wife is not a big Newt fan, as is often the case in the course of human relations, especially divorces.
“I am appalled that you would begin a presidential debate on a topic like that,” Mr. Gingrich responded, amid yet another thunderous ovation as Mr. King desperately tried shutting down the line of inquiry he began.
“Every person in here knows personal pain,” Mr. Gingrich said. “To take an ex-wife and make it, two days before the primary, a significant question in a presidential campaign is as close to despicable as anything I can imagine.”
So ferocious was the rebuke of the low-foreheaded moderator that he meekly tried to back out.
“This story did not come from our network,” he whined. In full attack, Mr. Gingrich pressed on.
“John! John!” he interjected with unstoppable anger. “It was repeated by your network. You chose to start the debate with it. Don’t try to blame somebody else. You and your staff chose to start this debate with that.”
LINK (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jan/20/hurt-why-use-despicable-clueless-left-wing-media-m/)QuoteThere is growing consternation in Republican circles and among conservatives over why Republicans keep allowing the various Communist, leftist and otherwise anti-American TV networks to host GOP debates.
The ickiness of Diana Sawyer asking questions in her cloying voice is more than most can bear. The utter cluelessness of the questions these people think actual American voters care about is mystifying. The shameless and ham-handed pandering to conservatives by the networks is revolting.
.....
From the moment the debate began, Mr. King tried setting the tone of the debate by lobbing unsubstantiated claims about Mr. Gingrich made by an ex-wife. News flash: The ex-wife is not a big Newt fan, as is often the case in the course of human relations, especially divorces.
“I am appalled that you would begin a presidential debate on a topic like that,” Mr. Gingrich responded, amid yet another thunderous ovation as Mr. King desperately tried shutting down the line of inquiry he began.
“Every person in here knows personal pain,” Mr. Gingrich said. “To take an ex-wife and make it, two days before the primary, a significant question in a presidential campaign is as close to despicable as anything I can imagine.”
So ferocious was the rebuke of the low-foreheaded moderator that he meekly tried to back out.
“This story did not come from our network,” he whined. In full attack, Mr. Gingrich pressed on.
“John! John!” he interjected with unstoppable anger. “It was repeated by your network. You chose to start the debate with it. Don’t try to blame somebody else. You and your staff chose to start this debate with that.”
The crowd did go wild when Newt waded into King and refused to let him get away with his ambush.
::danceban::
The crowd did go wild when Newt waded into King and refused to let him get away with his ambush.
::danceban::
If newt wasn't on that stage, I'm betting the rest of the field stumbles all over themselves to come up with reasonable drivel to the luny lefts stupidity. Hell, we've seen it before.
If newt serves no other purpose, he is writing the play book on how to respond to liberal sanctioned debates. Pay attention conservatives.
The crowd did go wild when Newt waded into King and refused to let him get away with his ambush.
::danceban::
If newt wasn't on that stage, I'm betting the rest of the field stumbles all over themselves to come up with reasonable drivel to the luny lefts stupidity. Hell, we've seen it before.
If newt serves no other purpose, he is writing the play book on how to respond to liberal sanctioned debates. Pay attention conservatives.
Yup. We are all tired of our guys playing by their rules!