It's About Liberty: A Conservative Forum
Topics => Judiciary, Crime, & Courts => Topic started by: warpmine on June 22, 2014, 12:19:35 PM
-
Ground Zero Cross: Court presses atheist group to explain why artifact is 'offensive'
“We’re thrilled that the court picked up on this issue,” said group lawyer Eric Baxter, whose brief argued that American Atheists had no right to bring a lawsuit in the first place. “Courts should not allow people to sue just because they claim to get ‘dyspepsia’ over a historical artifact displayed in a museum.”
“Taking personal offense is not an injury that warrants invoking the power of the courts to shut down everything you disagree with,” Baxter also said. “The Constitution is not a personal tool for censoring everyone’s beliefs but your own.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/06/21/ground-zero-cross/ (http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/06/21/ground-zero-cross/)
A glimmer of hope, a glimmer
-
We'll see. I'm not getting my hopes up again.
-
Mr. Baxter articulated a perfect rebuttal to all the grievance-mongers out there.
I hope it carries sufficient weight.
-
I'm with Pan on this one.
-
Mr. Baxter articulated a perfect rebuttal to all the grievance-mongers out there.
I hope it carries sufficient weight.
Sums it up.
-
Agreed, but the grievance-mongers never quit...we'll see where this settles in the end...