Note the hyper-effeminate bullsh*t language being spewed here: Obama Administration FORCES…
BULLsh*t.
Listen up, all ye flaccid effeminates, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS COERCION. The Obama regime can not FORCE you to do ANYTHING. You either freely choose to capitulate or not. This “forced”, “coercion” bullsh*t is 100% candyass agitprop.
You know what the solution to this is? Every parent who LOVES THEIR CHILDREN WITHDRAWS THEIR CHILDREN FROM PUBLIC SCHOOL MONDAY MORNING.
It is non-violent. It is very, very doable. Workarounds to educating children outside of the public schools abound.
And you know what? No one will do it. Public schools are now LITERALLY open, unapologetic child sex abuse centers, and no one will do a damn thing about it.
And you want me to fricking bayonet charge a machine gun for this? You want me to feel some warm, fuzzy feeling about preserving a culture in which not just the oligarchs are criminally insane, but also 99.999% of the civilian population to the point that they will shrug in complete passivity as their government tells them clearly and in no uncertain terms that they must surrender their children to be sexually abused and psychologically tortured into diabolical psychosexual perversion?
I will not fight FOR this. Never before in human history has there been a population so utterly and completely depraved. Just as I have advocated for the exterminations of the musloid CULTURE and the black hip-hop CULTURE, and cite the agreement by all morally sane people that the Nazi CULTURE had to be exterminated, so too I now declare that what is now the “american” culture MUST be exterminated.
These cultures must be exterminated so that the human beings inside of them might be saved.
... one day this past week, I was in the Post Office, in line behind a man wearing women's flats, a bra underneath his shirt (telltale indentations in the shirt-back) and sporting long, sparkly-red painted nails; he had a longer-in-the-back man's haircut, topped off with a man's brimmed hat on top of a very masculine face and your typical man's voice.
Do I want this guy in a ladies bathroom or locker room? Hell no. But unless the NC Lege passed HB2, this guy could have claimed (in Charlotte) -- and gotten away with it -- that he had a right to be in there and no woman would have had standing to tell him to get the hell out.
Quote... one day this past week, I was in the Post Office, in line behind a man wearing women's flats, a bra underneath his shirt (telltale indentations in the shirt-back) and sporting long, sparkly-red painted nails; he had a longer-in-the-back man's haircut, topped off with a man's brimmed hat on top of a very masculine face and your typical man's voice.
Do I want this guy in a ladies bathroom or locker room? Hell no. But unless the NC Lege passed HB2, this guy could have claimed (in Charlotte) -- and gotten away with it -- that he had a right to be in there and no woman would have had standing to tell him to get the hell out.
This happened last month, in my town, and I then posted the above on my local forum.
Thanks to the Obama Regime's latest mandate, few facilities owners or of those in authority will be willing to confront this guy, or any like him, for fear of being accused of Civil Rights violations, when he attempts an invasion into Women's facilities.
This cannot stand.
I will risk arrest & prosecution if, when out in public, my wife or daughter encounter such an occurrence. Sort of a reverse Rosa Parks move. It's too bad that we couldn't make it a coordinated effort; e.g. @ 12:00 Noon on such a date, people around the nation go in & oust trans-freaks from women's rest rooms.
This is a tipping point. Freaks need to be ousted and, perhaps, officials put six feet under.
That conversation with TP toilet Paper is typical.
Quote... one day this past week, I was in the Post Office, in line behind a man wearing women's flats, a bra underneath his shirt (telltale indentations in the shirt-back) and sporting long, sparkly-red painted nails; he had a longer-in-the-back man's haircut, topped off with a man's brimmed hat on top of a very masculine face and your typical man's voice.
Do I want this guy in a ladies bathroom or locker room? Hell no. But unless the NC Lege passed HB2, this guy could have claimed (in Charlotte) -- and gotten away with it -- that he had a right to be in there and no woman would have had standing to tell him to get the hell out.
This happened last month, in my town, and I then posted the above on my local forum.
Thanks to the Obama Regime's latest mandate, few facilities owners or of those in authority will be willing to confront this guy, or any like him, for fear of being accused of Civil Rights violations, when he attempts an invasion into Women's facilities.
This cannot stand.
While the overheated Marxist rhetoric of the 1960s has died away, the Leftist preoccupation with childhood sexuality, and its relentless desire to have the state control a child’s sexual development — and, by extension, to deny the child self-ownership — is still alive and well. The primary pathway the Left currently uses to decouple childhood sexual development from self-individuation is the gay rights agenda.
Many of us who believe that gays and lesbians should be free to pursue their personal lives free from discrimination have felt bewildered by our discomfort with and resistance to all of the homophilic programs that have suddenly invaded our children’s schools. To use the language of the Left, though, we should “listen to our feelings.”
Subconsciously, we recognize that these pro-homosexual programs have nothing to do with teaching tolerance, which is a virtue in a pluralistic society. Instead, the programs have everything to do with having the state substitute its goal of sexual, and therefore social, control in place of a parent’s desire to inculcate his children with traditional Judeo-Christian values, values that focus on the inviolability of the individual, beginning with his body.
Examples abound of supposedly anti-discriminatory programs that, instead of focusing on tolerance, work to direct a child’s sexual development away from the zone of privacy that is a hallmark of Western sexuality. Robin of Berkeley describes a group called “Gender Spectrum,” which has the ostensible goal of allowing “transgender, gender bending, [and] gender nonconforming” children and teens to hang with each other and share their experiences. She rightly sees this not as an effort to promote tolerance, but as a way to make it “cool to dabble in polyamory and gender nonconformism,” thereby “destroy[ing] the West by degrading traditional values.”....
Last year, a vigilant blogger exposed the fact that Kevin Jennings, Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar,” as part of his leadership role in the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (“GLSEN”), aggressively promoted child pornography in the classroom. GLSEN’s actions had nothing to do with creating a safe, non-discriminatory environment for young people with different sexual orientations and everything to do with using the government (i.e., public schools) to inculcate in children the notion that their bodies have no boundaries. A body with no boundaries, of course, is a body that can easily be decoupled from the individual’s control and then ceded to the state.
And, when they accuse me of saying "bad" or "nasty" things...I merely ask them for the metric or ontological (https://apologeticsworkshop.wordpress.com/2013/01/23/ontic-referent/) reference point for the accusation. Devoid of such an objective frame of reference, they can only resort to pragmatism; their worldview (of which they're ignorant) does not contain the metrics of good & evil or right & wrong. To do that they must smuggle in the Judeo/Christian Worldview...and reminding them of that produces better results/reactions that using the word "a$$hole". ;D
I like making this point as well when dealing with the "secular humanists."
“The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.”
--Richard Dawkins
"Fiction? Yet you do not believe in God...so, within the course of human events, who or whom have done these things?"
--Ravi Zacharias
JF is right, this whole issue was planned from the beginning just like Stephanopoulos blindsiding Romney with that birth control question, which sparked the "War on Women" bullsh*t.
I think they've overreached, especially with His Imperial Highness issuing those school bathroom orders on Friday.
This is what the Obama administration nudged the rest of the country toward Friday. Yes, the thought of male genitalia in girls’ locker rooms – and vice versa – might be distressing to some. But the battle for equality has always been in part about overcoming discomfort – with blacks sharing facilities, with gays sharing marriage – then realizing that it was not nearly so awful as some people imagined.
(http://www.charlotteobserver.com/opinion/editorials/article77475147.html#pq=EGNkEi)
From the article Weisshaupt linked: "This is what the Obama administration nudged the rest of the country toward Friday."
Notice the typical dissembling language -- "nudged." They aren't "nudging" sh*t. They're making sweeping demands and the price of refusal is the funding that the states were deliberately made dependent upon. It's like a pimp getting his brood of women addicted to drugs, and using that as part of his leverage over them. Insult to injury is the fact that this money comes from the states in the first place.
It's well past time for this and several other issues to be forced. The time of acquiescence is over. If we comply, we lose something far bigger than federal funds. Let them cut off their funds. Let them send their armed goons to force compliance from governors and school superintendents and principals and teachers and parents.
When naked tyranny is their design, the first meaningful counterattack is to make them show themselves for what they are.
A law in New York City will fine businesses and employers if they violate a person's human rights by not using their preferred 'gender pronoun.'
Mayor Bill de Blasio's Commission on Human Rights appears to have updated the law on 'Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Expression' to include businesses, employees and landlords who fail to refer to transgender people as terms such as 'ze' and 'hir'.
They will be in violation of the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL), that forces employers and 'converted entities to use an individual's preferred name, pronoun and title (e.g., Ms./Mrs.) regardless of the individual's sex assigned at birth, anatomy, gender, medical history, appearance, or the sex indicated on the individual's identification,' according to the guidance information on the city's website.
The Commission on Human Rights issued a 'legal enforcement guidance' for the law, and notes that some people would prefer non-gender-binary pronouns, including 'they/them/theirs or 'ze/hir.'
That calls for massive rebellion and an avalanche of politically incorrect in-your--progtard-face invectives and a dare to try to enforce their forced acceptance of perversion and depravity!
That calls for massive rebellion and an avalanche of politically incorrect in-your--progtard-face invectives and a dare to try to enforce their forced acceptance of perversion and depravity!
That's way too hard to remember (almost as bad as conjugating verbs). I'll simply stick to "Trans-effing gender freakazoid", "It", "Male B*tch" or "Sociopath"...that way I don't have to think too hard.
That calls for massive rebellion and an avalanche of politically incorrect in-your--progtard-face invectives and a dare to try to enforce their forced acceptance of perversion and depravity!
That calls for massive rebellion and an avalanche of politically incorrect in-your--progtard-face invectives and a dare to try to enforce their forced acceptance of perversion and depravity!
So.....I'm guessing, if a queerdo comes into your business, the owner and employees will be able to distinguish who is a queerdo and who isn't? What are they gonna wear...a sign?
That calls for massive rebellion and an avalanche of politically incorrect in-your--progtard-face invectives and a dare to try to enforce their forced acceptance of perversion and depravity!
So.....I'm guessing, if a queerdo comes into your business, the owner and employees will be able to distinguish who is a queerdo and who isn't? What are they gonna wear...a sign?
Sort of. The ones who "pass" aren't usually a problem -- they look like women and are unobtrusive -- but what businesses all over the country are recounting are men who look/dress/speak/act like men pushing into women's bathrooms and dressing rooms and insisting they have the right to do so.
There's yer sign.
That calls for massive rebellion and an avalanche of politically incorrect in-your--progtard-face invectives and a dare to try to enforce their forced acceptance of perversion and depravity!
So.....I'm guessing, if a queerdo comes into your business, the owner and employees will be able to distinguish who is a queerdo and who isn't? What are they gonna wear...a sign?
Sort of. The ones who "pass" aren't usually a problem -- they look like women and are unobtrusive -- but what businesses all over the country are recounting are men who look/dress/speak/act like men pushing into women's bathrooms and dressing rooms and insisting they have the right to do so.
There's yer sign.
The queerdos. I'm waiting for the first business to hang the "restrooms under repair" signage and line up several port a potties in front of their entrances.
Wal Mart spanks Macy's and Bathroom Target!
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-19/wal-mart-share-surge-after-earnings-leaves-peers-in-dust-chart (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-19/wal-mart-share-surge-after-earnings-leaves-peers-in-dust-chart)
::thumbsup::
Wal Mart spanks Macy's and Bathroom Target!
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-19/wal-mart-share-surge-after-earnings-leaves-peers-in-dust-chart (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-19/wal-mart-share-surge-after-earnings-leaves-peers-in-dust-chart)
::thumbsup::
That was the the easiest prediction I've ever made. Target and WalMart are only a few blocks from each other in EP. I have been going to Target because Targets are usually nicer stores than WalMart. I changed back to WalMart on a dime when this hit and I assume many others did also.
Yep. We used to laugh at this stuff. Pass it off as a crazy person......Now? Celebrated. ::grouphug:: ::gaah::
Meh, I rarely went there anyway. Target is the kind of place from which one cannot buy outside garbage cans; they just have little trash baskets for in the house. And Walmart and Kohl's have better ones of those and nicer towels.
43 Sexual Predator Establishment Republicans Join DemoPerv's to Support Obama’s Penis-Sporting Cross-Dressing Sex Offender "Transgender" Agenda
FIFY
#CutItsPenisOff!
I found this kinda funny...
(http://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p403x403/13254102_1353369348023334_168233777985094664_n.jpg)
http://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2016/05/25/harrison-strip-club-sign/84909640/ (http://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2016/05/25/harrison-strip-club-sign/84909640/)
Sadly, in ObamaWorld...a girl might be safer on a striper stage than a Target ladies room...
::unknowncomic::
I found this kinda funny...
(http://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p403x403/13254102_1353369348023334_168233777985094664_n.jpg)
http://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2016/05/25/harrison-strip-club-sign/84909640/ (http://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2016/05/25/harrison-strip-club-sign/84909640/)
Sadly, in ObamaWorld...a girl might be safer on a striper stage than a Target ladies room...
::unknowncomic::
Idaho police arrested a man — who identifies as a transgender woman — on one count of felony voyeurism Tuesday after he took pictures of a woman while she was changing clothes in a Target dressing room, the Post Register reported.
Sheriff’s deputies arrested 43-year-old Sean Patrick Smith, who reportedly identifies as Shauna Patricia Smith, the day after he was spotted reaching over the changing room wall with a cell phone taking pictures of a woman who was trying on clothes. The victim confronted Smith, who then ran out of the store.
The alleged incident took place on Monday. Authorities tracked down Smith after interviewing witnesses and reviewing security footage, local news stations reported. If convicted, Smith faces up to five years in prison.
Target announced in April that men who identify as women would be allowed to use the women’s facilities at the retail store. Soon after, a man recorded himself receiving permission from Target staff to use the women’s bathrooms after he explained that’s where he “feels comfortable.”
I just read that and jumped in here...my prediction came true...Target is more dangerous for a real woman to be in than a striper stage!
Hope he feels "comfortable" getting it in jail.
Perv is lucky no Alpha was around to kick the ever-livin' crap out of it!
Dude is uglier than dancing Buffalo Bill from Silence of the Lambs too.